Crossover Service Requirements: Analysis and Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Convergence in Crossover Service

Part of the book series: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China ((ATSTC,volume 68))

  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

Crossover services often span multiple industry boundaries, and user requirements are typically diverse and personalized, leading to many challenges in requirements analysis and system design. In essence, crossover services are developed to meet user requirements across multiple domains. An approach of requirements convergence-analysis, design and evolution is proposed to support the convergence process in service requirements analysis and design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://wordnet.princeton.edu/.

References

  1. Liu Z, Li B, Wang J, Qiao Y (2020) A value-driven modeling approach for crossover services. Int J Web Serv Res 17(3):20–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thew S, Sutcliffe A (2018) Value-based requirements engineering: method and experience. Requir Eng 23(4):443–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zarvic N, Daneva M, Wieringa R (2007) Value-based requirements engineering for value webs. In: International working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality, pp 116–128

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akkermans JM, Gordijn J (2003) Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requir Eng 8(2):114–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caetano A et al (2017) Representation and analysis of enterprise models with semantic techniques: an application to ArchiMate, e3value and business model canvas. Knowl Inf Syst 50(1):315–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asadi M, Gröner G, Mohabbati B, Gašević D (2016) Goal-oriented modeling and verification of feature-oriented product lines. Softw Syst Model 15(1):257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelsmana W, Quartelc D, Jonkersa H, van Sinderen M (2011) Extending enterprise architecture modelling with business goals and requirements. Enterp Inf Syst 5(1):9–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Z, Li B, Wang J, Qiao Y (2020) A value-driven modeling approach for crossover services. Int J Web Serv Res (IJWSR) 17(3):20–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peng Y, Li B, Wang J, Liu Z (2020) An approach of crossover service goal convergence and conflicts resolution. In: IEEE World Congress on services (SERVICES), pp 225–230

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shan Y, Qiao Y, Li B, Wang J (2020) A process convergence approach for crossover services based on message flow partition and merging. In: IEEE International conference on services computing (SCC), pp 178–185

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zemni MA, Mammar A, Ben Hadj-Alouane N (2016) An automated approach for merging business process fragments. Comput Ind 82:104–118

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozkaya M, Erata F (2020) A survey on the practical use of UML for different software architecture viewpoints. Inf Softw Technol 121(4):106–275

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rivera L, Villegas N, Tamura G et al (2018) UML-driven automated software deployment. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual international conference on computer science and software engineering, pp 257–268

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lam B, Nguyen V, Phan C (2020) An approach for application generation based on BPMN. In: International conference on knowledge and systems engineering (KSE), pp 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nepomuceno T, Oliveira E Jr (2021) Software product line traceability and product configuration in class and sequence diagrams: an empirical study. In: International conference on enterprise information systems, pp 97–204

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bouzidi A, Haddar N, Ben-Abdallah M et al (2020) From BPMN to sequence diagrams: transformation and traceability. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on evaluation of novel approaches to software engineering, pp 438–445

    Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Fedaghi S (2021) UML sequence diagram: an alternative model. ar**v:2105.15152

  18. Decan A, Mens T, Grosjean P (2019) An empirical comparison of dependency network evolution in seven software packaging ecosystems. Empir Softw Eng 24(1):381–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mens T, Claes M, Grosjean P, Serebrenik A (2014) Studying evolving software ecosystems based on ecological models. Evolv Softw Syst 297–326

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khelladi DE, Combemale B, Acher M et al (2020) On the power of abstraction: a model-driven co-evolution approach of software code. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd international conference on software engineering: new ideas and emerging results (ICSE-NIER), pp 85–88

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qi Q, Cao J, Liu Y (2020) The evolution of software ecosystem in GitHub. J Comput Res Dev 57(3):513–524

    Google Scholar 

  22. Teixeira J, Hyrynsalmi S (2017) How do software ecosystems co-evolve. In: International conference of software business (ICSOB), pp 115–130

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khatwani C, ** X, Niu N et al (2017) Advancing viewpoint merging in requirements engineering: a theoretical replication and explanatory study. Requir Eng 22(3):317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo S, Xu C, Chen S, Xue X, Feng Z, Chen S (2019) Crossover service fusion approach based on microservice architecture. In: IEEE International conference on web services (ICWS), pp 237–241

    Google Scholar 

  25. Derguech W, Bhiri S, Curry E (2017) Designing business capability-aware configurable process models. Inf Syst 72:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bouzidi A, Haddar N, Ben Abdallah M, Haddar K (2018) Alignment of business processes and requirements through model integration. In: 2018 IEEE/ACS 15th International conference on computer systems and applications (AICCSA), pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Zhejiang University Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Qiao, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, J., Li, B. (2023). Crossover Service Requirements: Analysis and Design. In: Yin, J., Li, B., Wang, Z., Deng, S. (eds) Convergence in Crossover Service. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China, vol 68. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8844-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8844-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8843-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8844-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation