Affordance Theory as a Framework for Twenty-first Century Learning Principles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creating Dynamic Places for Learning
  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

Affordance theory (Gibson, 1979) has emerged as a perspective embraced by architects and researchers involved with the planning of learning environments. While this perspective can relate to the design of learning environments, this chapter presents a reinterpretation of affordance theory. This reinterpretation locates Gibson’s concept of the niche in the foreground. With this interpretation, school buildings may be understood as comprising a variety of places for learning. These different places inside and outside classrooms can encourage learners to become fully engaged in acquiring knowledge and mastering skills (Lave and Wenger in Situated learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991; Patel in An analysis of Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger’s situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Macat International, London, 2018). Hence, this chapter will expand the notion of affordances beyond the concept of objects that an individual picks up by engaging with the physical environment toward a nuanced analysis of the role of the affordance(s) within the context of the social situations that guide the learning process. From this analysis, this chapter will examine twenty-first century Learning Principles. Moreover, twenty-first century Learning Principles will be explored in the context of space, the practice of teaching and learning as well as in relationship to affordance theory and situated learning theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, I. (1992). A transactional perspective on transitions to new environments. Environment and Behavior, 24(2), 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. The Journal of General Psychology, 137(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.484448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., O’Mara, J., & Loughlin, J. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes: Literature review. Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Retrieved from http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/publ/research/publ/blackmore_learning_spaces.pdf

  • Bradbeer, C. (2022). ‘Innovative’ teacher collaboration in (Elementary) innovative learning environments (ILEs): Products and potential. In M. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational innovation. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T., & Lippman, P. C. (2018). Classroom design should follow evidence, not architectural fads. https://theconversation.com/classroom-design-should-follow-evidence-not-architectural-fads-89861

  • Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglements in innovative learning spaces: Connecting, theory, design and practice. The British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/ber.3483

  • Deed, C., Blake, D., Henriksen, J., Mooney, A., Prain, V., Tytler, R., & Fingland, D. (2020). Teacher adaptation to flexible learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 23(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09302-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deed, C., & Lesko, T. (2015). Unwalling’ the classroom: Teacher reaction and adaptation. Learning Environments Research, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9181-6

  • Frelin, A., & Grannas, J. (2020). Teachers’ pre-occupancy evaluation of affordances in a multi-zone flexible learning environment—Introducing an analytical model. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1797859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9071-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychological Association, Inc., 53(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Escribano, M., Noble, J., & Pinedo, M. (2013). The only wrong cell is the dead one: On the enactive approach to normativity. In P. Liò, O. Miglino, G. Nicosia, S. Nolfi, & M. Pavone (Eds.), Advances in artificial life, ECAL 2013 (pp. 665–670). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Escribano, M., Noble, J., & Pinedo, M. (2015). Enactivism, action and normativity: A Wittgensteinian analysis. Adaptive Behavior, 23(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Wooler, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. The Design Council. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from www.design-council.org.uk

  • Lang, J. (1988). Understanding the normative theories of architecture: The potential role of the behavioral sciences. Environment & Behavior, 20(5), 601–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (1995). The meaning of constructed objects (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (2002). Understanding activity settings in relationship to the design of learning environments. CAE Net Quarterly Newsletter. AIA Committee on Architecture for Education. http://www.aia.org/pia/gateway/CAE_Net/Vol_3/Just-a-Thought.pdf

  • Lippman, P. C. (2010). Evidence base design for elementary and secondary schools: A responsive approach to creating learning environments. John Wiley and Sons: Newark, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (Expected Date of Publication: 2023). Understanding the function of complementary settings in contemporary learning environments. PhD., LA Trobe University, The School of Arts, Sciences & Commerce, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C., & Mathews, E. (2018). Re-imagining the open classroom. In S. Alterator & C. Deed (Eds.), School space and its occupation: The conceptualisation and evaluation of innovative learning environments (pp. 63–85). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Presti, P. (2020). Persons and affordances. Ecological Psychology, 32(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2019.1689821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. H. (2002). The classroom environment and its effects on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, E., & Lippman, P. C. (2016, June). The physical environments of early childhood centers: A case study in the use of break-out spaces. The International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 7(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mealings, K. T. (2022). Acoustics and classrooms. In M. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational innovation. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P., & Fielding, R. (2005). The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st century schools (p. 33). Designshare.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). 21st century learning environments. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, C. (2018). An analysis of Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger’s situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Macat International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, B. (2014). Designing new learning environments to support 21st century skills. In J. Blanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 117–147). Solution Tree. https://www.solutiontree.com/free-resources/21stcenturyskills/21stcs

  • PEHKA. (2012). Unpublished responsive research report. Projects for Environmental Health Knowledge and Action, inc. http://pehka.org/

  • Pocheville, A. (2015). The ecological niche: History and recent controversies. In T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre et al. (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences (pp. 547–586). Springer. ISBN 978-94-017-9014-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Factors contributing to changes in a deep approach to learning in different learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 18(3), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, L. G., & Wolfe, M. (1985). Institutional settings in children’s lives. NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (1993). Designing a responsive school environment. Children’s Environments, 10(2), 140–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (2002). Community participation methods in design and planning. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer. R. (1969). Personal space. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1997). Rousing minds to life: Teaching and learning in context. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R. (2009). Complexity and design: How school architecture influences learning. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 3(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and contradiction in architecture. The Museum of Modern Art Press. ISBN 0-87070-281-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. S. (1979, Autumn). The physical environment of school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, F., Cleveland, B., & Imms, W. (2019). The affordances of innovative learning environments for deep learning: Educators’ and architects’ perceptions. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00354-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. Lippman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lippman, P.C. (2023). Affordance Theory as a Framework for Twenty-first Century Learning Principles. In: Lippman, P.C., Matthews, E.A. (eds) Creating Dynamic Places for Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8749-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation