Abstract
Research in the field of education has explored how different spaces influence learning and teaching. In addition, aesthetics within these educational spaces have been noted to influence learning positively. Not only is space important to consider in learning contexts, but the ways in which people treat, value and respect each other within these can act as a catalyst for positive learning outcomes. Alternative educational philosophies such as Steiner, Reggio Emilia, and Forest Schools see space as an important component for learning in these contexts. Often these educational perspectives value inquiry-based and imaginative approaches to interacting with others and as such, aesthetics plays a critical role in bridging this connection. The chapter will also explore relational pedagogies including pedagogy of care and compassionate and empathetic approaches to teaching. It will also unpack mindfulness and habits of mind in promoting aesthetic approaches to education. Finally, creative and socially-just approaches to aesthetic literacies will be discussed to advocate a holistic view of education that values the presence of beauty in our lives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, K. T., Stewart, O. G., & Kachorsky, D. (2017). Seeing academically marginalized students’ multimodal designs from a position of strength. Written Communication, 34(2), 104–134.
Arias, J. M. (2020). Here and back again: Relational pedagogy in informal and environmental education. Stanford University.
Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS]. (2008–2009). Australian Bureau of Statistics: Annual report. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%40.nsf/ProductsbyReleaseDate/BEF0DD6186B945D3CA2577C80012D251%3FOpenDocument
Barton, R. S., & Barton, G. M. (2014). Storytelling as an arts literacy: Use of narrative structure in Aboriginal arts practice and performance. In G. M. Barton (Ed.), Literacy in the arts: Retheorising learning and teaching (pp. 251–268). Springer Publishers.
Barton, G., & Garvis, S. (2019). Theorizing compassion and empathy in educational contexts: What are compassion and empathy and why are they important? In Compassion and empathy in educational contexts (pp. 3–14). Palgrave Macmillan.
Becher, R. (1993). The aesthetic classroom environment and student attitude toward school.
Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C., & Otrel-Cass, K. (Eds.). (2016). Exploring emotions, aesthetics and wellbeing in science education research (Vol. 13). Springer.
Bishop, R., Ladwig, J., & Berryman, M. (2014). The centrality of relationships for pedagogy: The whanaungatanga thesis. American Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 184–214.
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics (S. Pleasance & F. Woods, Trans.). les presses du reel.
Briar-hill Primary School (n.d.). Classroom aesthetics. Retrieved from https://www.briar-hill-ps.vic.edu.au/classroom-aesthetics.html
Brown, M. F. (2020). The third teacher: An analysis of aesthetic and intentionality of space in the classroom. Senior Honors Projects, 2020-Current. 32. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors202029/32
Burke, K., & Larmar, S. (2021). Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(5), 601–615.
Cekaite, A., & Björk-Willén, P. (2018). Enchantment in storytelling: Co-operation and participation in children’s aesthetic experience. Linguistics and Education, 48, 52–60.
Chapman, S. N. (2015). Arts immersion: Using the arts as a language across the primary school curriculum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9), 5.
Chou, M. J., Cheng, J. C., & Cheng, Y. W. (2016). Operating classroom aesthetic reading environment to raise children’s reading motivation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 81–97.
COAG Reform Council. (2014). Indigenous reform 2012–13: Five years of performance. Report to the Council of Australian Governments. Australian Government.
Cohen, G. (2006). Research on creativity and aging: The positive impact of the arts on health and illness. Generations, 30(1), 7–15.
Coleman, E. B. (2017). Aboriginal art, identity and appropriation. Routledge.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Discovering and exploring habits of mind. A developmental series, book 1. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Daniel, R., & Johnstone, R. (2017a). Becoming an artist: Exploring the motivations of undergraduate students at a regional Australian University. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6), 1015–1032.
Daniel, R., & Johnstone, R. (2017b). Frameworks for building artists’ resilience. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, (Special Edition: Mental Health, December), 89–104.
Dean, S. (2019). Seeing the forest and the trees: A historical and conceptual look at Danish forest schools. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(3), 53–63.
Downey, A. (2007). Towards a politics of (relational) aesthetics. Third Text, 21(3), 267–275.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In J. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9–20). Routledge.
Forest School Association [FSA]. (n.d.). What is forest school? Retrieved from https://forestschoolassociation.org/what-is-forest-school/
Foster, V. (2015). Collaborative arts-based research for social justice. Routledge.
Frazier, A. M. (1973). The Aesthetic Dimensions of Educational Space. Journal of Thought, 130–138.
Greene, M. (1986). The spaces of aesthetic education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20(4), 56–62.
Grenfell, M., & Hardy, C. (2007). Art rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the visual arts. Berg.
Häikiö, T. K. (2020). Aesthetic learning processes in early childhood and early years education: Reflections on educating for sustainable development and use of visual tools and materials. Techne Serien-Forskning i Slöjdpedagogik Och Slöjdvetenskap, 27(2), 15–30.
Harris, K. I. (2015). Developmentally universal practice: Visioning innovative early childhood pedagogy for meeting the needs of diverse learners. Early Child Development and Care, 185(11–12), 1880–1893.
Hinchion, C. (2016). Embodied and aesthetic education approaches in the English classroom. English in Education, 50(2), 182–198.
Howard, S. (n.d.). What young children really need the essentials of Waldorf early childhood education. The Research Institute for Waldorf Education.
Hughes, J. M. (2018). Progressing positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse analysis. Review of Communication, 18(3), 193–211.
Igoa, C. (2015). Immigrant children: Art as a second language. In Invisible children in the society and its schools (pp. 143–166). Routledge.
Inocian, R. B. (2018). Aesthetic teaching pedagogies: A voice of experience. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Jackson, R., & McCullagh, S. (2015). Develo** aesthetic empathy: A capacity for teaching in constructivist learning environments. The Canadian Review of Art, 180–197.
Johnson, L. (2016). Cultural capitals: Revaluing the arts, remaking urban spaces. Routledge.
Kind, S. (2016). Introduction: The visual arts in early childhood education. Journal of Childhood Studies, 41(4), 3.
Malone, K. (2015). Posthumanist approaches to theorising children’s human-nature relations. In K. Nairn, P. Kraftl, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Space, place and environment (pp. 1–22). Springer.
Manera, L. (2019). The aesthetic experience in the Reggio Emilia Approach. Studi di estetica (13).
Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria De Estudios Ingleses, 49, 197.
Matthews, J. H. (2008). Develo** creative capital: What can we learn from the workplace? In Proceedings Creating Value: Between Commerce and Commons, Brisbane.
Maynard, T. (2007). Forest schools in Great Britain: An initial exploration. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(4), 320–331.
Medina, Y. (2012). Critical Aesthetic Pedagogy: Toward a Theory of Self and Social Empowerment. Peter Lang
Miller, V. (2019). Creating the third teacher through participatory learning environment design: Reggio Emilia principles support student wellbeing. In School Spaces for Student Wellbeing and Learning (pp. 239–258). Springer.
Montessori Academy (2022). The Montessori classroom: Inspired design. Retrieved from https://montessoriacademy.com.au/montessori-classroom-design/
Nartey, M. (2021). A feminist critical discourse analysis of Ghanaian feminist blogs. Feminist Media Studies, 21(4), 657–672.
Noddings, N. (2005). Educating moral people. Teachers College Press.
Noddings, N. (2010). Moral education and caring. Theory and Research in Education, 8(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878510368617
O’Brien, M., & Blue, L. (2018). Towards a positive pedagogy: Designing pedagogical practices that facilitate positivity within the classroom. Educational Action Research, 26(3), 365–384.
Ockenden, L. (2014). Positive learning environments for Indigenous children and young people. Resource sheet no. 33. Closing the Gap Clearinghouse.
Østern, T. P., & Strømme, A. (2014, October). Learning through Aesthetic Pedagogical Design. In The Educational Forum (Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 378–388). Routledge.
Paek, K. M. (2015). A critical cultural inquiry into insider issues in South Korean art education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(6), 915–933.
Pascoe, R. (2015). Teaching the arts: For the AiR Summer School 2016. Stage Page.
Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2020). Uncommon worlds: Toward an ecological aesthetics of childhood in the Anthropocene. In Research handbook on childhood nature: Assemblages of childhood and nature research (pp. 1657–1679).
Russell, N. (2019). The importance of environmental aesthetics to educator and child wellbeing. The Sector: Early Education News, Views and Reviews.
Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the arts develop the young brain: Neuroscience research is revealing the impressive impact of arts instruction on students’ cognitive, social, and emotional development. School Administrator, 63(11), 26–32.
Sutherland, I., & Ladkin, D. (2013). Creating engaged executive learning spaces: The role of aesthetic agency. Organizational Aesthetics, 2(1), 105–124.
Thompson, J. (2015). Towards an aesthetics of care. Research in Drama Education: THe Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 20(4), 430–441.
Tinmannsvik, L., & Bjelland, H. V. (2009). Children and aesthetics: Exploring toddlers’ aesthetic experience of everyday products. International Journal of Product Development, 9(4), 370–388.
van den Bogerd, N., Dijkstra, S. C., Tanja-Dijkstra, K., de Boer, M. R., Seidell, J. C., Koole, S. L., & Maas, J. (2020). Greening the classroom: Three field experiments on the effects of indoor nature on students’ attention, well-being, and perceived environmental quality. Building and Environment, 171, 106675.
Webster, R., & Wolfe, M. (2013). Incorporating the aesthetic dimension into pedagogy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (online), 38(10), 21–33.
Wilson, R. A. (2010). Aesthetics and a sense of wonder. Exchange.
Wright, S. (2015). Children, meaning-making and the arts. Pearson Higher Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barton, G. (2023). The Importance of Aesthetics in Educational Spaces and Relationships. In: Aesthetic Literacies in School and Work. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7750-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7750-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7749-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7750-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)