International Synchronization of Growth Rate Cycles: An Analysis in Frequency Domain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Macroeconometric Methods
  • 333 Accesses

Abstract

This study examines international synchronization of growth rate cycles using spectral techniques in the frequency domain. In particular, we look at synchronization of growth rate cycles between bilateral country pairs, US, UK, Germany, Japan and India over the period from January 1974 to December 2018. We examine two aspects of the synchronization process—one, strength of co-movement across countries’ growth rate cycles, and two, sequencing in terms of leads and lags of these cycles vis-à-vis each other. The strength of co-movements is analyzed using coherences of growth rate cycles between bilateral country pairs across frequency bands and over time. The lead–lag structure between growth rate cycles of countries is obtained from the spectral phase shift parameter. This is evaluated against the lead–lag structure in the time domain, as inferred from the reference chronology given by the Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI). Based on the growth rate of the coincident index obtained from ECRI, we infer the sequencing of growth rate cycles in one country vis-à-vis the other in terms of the relative timing of their peaks and troughs. This comparative analysis across the time and frequency domains highlights both the pattern of lead–lag in terms of timing of peaks and troughs (time domain) as well as the lead–lag in terms of all phases of the cycle (frequency domain). For analyzing these patterns over time, we undertake the exercise over two subsamples: January 1974–December 1990 and January 1991–December 2018. We find that the coherence between developed country pairs is, in general, higher than that between developed–emerging economy pairs. We also find evidence of greater co-movement of country cycles post-1990, as compared with that in 1974–1990. The magnitude of leads–lags shows that the synchronization process is faster in the latter time period. The leads–lags obtained from the spectral phase shift estimates are found to be in line with those inferred from economic indicator analysis (EIA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    To gain insight into the cyclical process of growth, it is important to understand the difference between business cycles and growth rate cycles and their relationship. A business cycle measures ups and downs in economic activity. Growth rate cycles, on the other hand, are cyclical upswings and downswings in the growth rate of economic activity. The reference chronology method (based on the economic indicator analysis) of dating cycles defines peaks and troughs in the cycle. A movement from a peak to a trough is said to constitute a contraction (slowdown) while that from a trough to a peak an expansion (pickup). A slowdown, a milder counterpart of a recession, is a downshift in the pace of growth in economic activity. Economic slowdowns begin with reduced but still positive growth rates, which may eventually develop into recessions.

  2. 2.

    More detailed discussion of spectral analysis are provided by Priestley, (1981), Fuller, (1976), Harvey, (1993), Hamilton, (1994), Chatfield, (1996), Hatanaka, (1996) and others.

  3. 3.

    For illustration, we use the relationship to the numbers used in Fig. 3. Over a period of 10 years, the high-frequency component corresponding to T = 12 months is equivalent to ω = 2πf = 2π/T = π/6. Similarly, the business cycle frequencies for T = 48 work out to be associated with ω = π/24, and a low frequency corresponding to T = 108 has ω = π/54.

  4. 4.

    We employ non-evolutionary spectral techniques, which requires that the time series be stationary. For examining the stationarity status of series, we conducted unit root tests, focusing on the DF-GLS (Elliot et al., 1996) and the KPSS test proposed by Kwiatkowski et al., (1992).

  5. 5.

    See Granger and Hatanaka, (1964) or Priestley, (1981) for proof.

  6. 6.

    For details, see Priestley, (1981).

  7. 7.

    Some authors refer to \(\left| {w_{ij} (\omega )} \right|^{2}\) as the coherence.

  8. 8.

    For the polar form \(\hat{h}_{ij} (\omega ) = \hat{c}_{ij} (\omega ) - i\hat{q}_{ij} (\omega )\), the co-spectrum is the real part and quadrature spectrum the imaginary part.

  9. 9.

    Results are not reported for the sake of brevity, but are available from the authors on request.

  10. 10.

    Granger and Hatanaka, (1964) call a coherence value of more than 0.5 as high.

  11. 11.

    Since the beginning of 1990s has historical significance as far as events in the international economy are concerned, this was used as a divide year for the sample.

  12. 12.

    See Granger and Hatanaka, (1964).

References

  • Aguiar-Conraria, L., & Soares, M. J. (2011). Business cycle synchronization and the Euro: A wavelet analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 33, 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allegret, J. P., & Essaadi, E. (2011). Business cycle synchronization in East Asian economy: Evidence from time-varying coherence study. Economic Modelling, 28, 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloui, C., & Hkiri, B. (2014). Co-movements of GCC emerging stock markets: New evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Economic Modelling, 36, 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H. M., & Terasvirta, T. (1992). Characterizing non-linearities in business cycles using smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, S119–S136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakakis, N. (2012). Business cycle synchronization during US recessions since the beginning of the 1870s. Economics Letters, 117, 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artis, M. (2003). Is there a European business cycle, WP 1053, CESIFO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artis, M., Kontolemis, Z. G., & Osborn, D. R. (1997). Business cycles for G7 and European countries. Journal of Business, 70, 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus, D. K., Kehoe, P. J., & Kydland, F. E. (1992). International real business cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 745–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, A., & Dua, P. (2010). Synchronization of recessions in major developed and emerging economies. Margin—The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 4, 197–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, A., & Dua, P. (2011). Predicting recessions and slowdowns: A robust approach, WP 202, Centre for Development Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, A., & Hiris, L. (2001). A framework for measuring international business cycles. International Journal of Forecasting, 17, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bátorová, I. (2007). Application of factor models in business cycle analysis in the enlarged EU, Unpublished Master Thesis, Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bátorová, I., Fidrmuc, J., & Korhonen, I. (2008). China in the world economy: Dynamic correlation analysis of business cycles, discussion paper 7, Bank of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bátorová, I., Fidrmuc, J., & Korhonen, I. (2009). New global players and disharmonies in the world orchestra: Cohesion analysis of business cycles of China. InThe Economic Performance of the European Union, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bátorová, I., Fidrmuc, J., & Korhonen, I. (2011). From Decoupling of Asian Stock Markets to Recoupling during the Great Recession. In S. Rosefielde, M. Kuboniwa, & S. Mizobata (Eds.), Two Asias: The emerging postcrisis divide, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bátorová, I., Fidrmuc, J., & Korhonen, I. (2013). China in the world economy: Dynamic correlation analysis of business cycles. Cesifo Economic Studies, 59, 392–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M. (1995). International trade and business cycles. Handbook of International Economics, 3, 1801–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. & Helbling, T. (2003). Are they all in the same boat? The 2000–2001 Growth Slowdown and the G-7 Business Cycle Linkages, WP 46, IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdiev, A. N., & Chang, C. P. (2015). Business cycle synchronization in Asia-Pacific: New evidence from wavelet analysis. Journal of Asian Economics, 37, 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, E. A. (2001). The contribution of economic indicator analysis to understanding and forecasting business cycles. Indian Economic Review, 36, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. D. & Hebling, T. (2003). Have national business cycles become more synchronized, WP 10130, NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J., & Candelon, B. (2001). Is there a European business cycle? New insights from a frequency domain analysis. Vierteljahrshefte Zur Wirtschaftsforschung (quarterly Journal of Economic Research), 70, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bry, G. & Boschan, C. (1971). Standard Business Cycle Analysis of Economic Time Series. In G. Bry, & C. Boschan (Eds.), Cyclical analysis of time series: Selected procedures and computer programs, NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A., & Mitchell, W. (1946). Measuring business cycles. New York: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakır, M. Y., & Kabundi, A. (2013). Trade shocks from BRIC to South Africa: A global VAR analysis. Economic Modelling, 32, 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camba-Mendez, G. & Kapetanios, G. (2001). Spectral based methods to identify common trends and common cycles, WP 62, European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, N. F., Fidrmuc, J., & Korhonen, I. (2019). Business cycle synchronisation and currency unions: A review of the econometric evidence using meta-analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 61, 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candelon, B., & Hecq, A. (2000). Stability of Okun’s law in a co-dependent system. Applied Economic Letters, 7, 687–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canova, F. (1998). Detrending and business cycle facts. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41, 475–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canova, F., & Dellas, H. (1993). Trade interdependence and the international business cycle. Journal of International Economics, 34, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canova, F., Ciccarelli, M., & Ortega, E. (2007). Similarities and convergence in G-7 cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 850–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. (1996). The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croux, C., Forni, M., & Reichlin, L. (1999). A measure of co-movement for economic variables: Theory and empirics, No. 2339, CEPR Discussion Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubadda, G., & Hecq, A. (2001). On non-contemporaneous short-run co-movements. Economics Letters, 73, 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers with applications to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119, 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrénot, G., & Keddad, B. (2014). Business cycles synchronization in East Asia: A Markov-switching approach. Economic Modelling, 42, 186–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64, 813–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Vahid, F. (1993). Common trends and common cycles. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8, 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Kozicki, S. (1993). Testing for common features. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11, 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidrmuc, J., Korhonen, I., & Poměnková, J. (2014). China and the world economy: Wavelet spectrum analysis of business cycles. Applied Economics Letters, 21, 1309–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filardo, A. J., & Gordon, S. F. (1994). International Co-movements of Business Cycles, WP 94–11, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. (1976). Introduction to statistical time series. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. A. (1961). Business fluctuations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. (1969). Investigating casual relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. J., & Hatanaka, M. (1964). Spectral Analysis of Economic Time Series. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of non-stationary time series and business cycles. Econometrica, 57, 357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (2005). Oil and the macroeconomy. In S. Durlauf, & L. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanus, L. & Vacha, L. (2015). Business Cycle Synchronization of the Visegrad Four and the European Union, WP 42, Collaborative EU Project Financial Distortions and Macroeconomic Performance: Expectations, Constraints and Interaction of Agents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D., & Pagan, A. (2006). Synchronization of Cycles. Journal of Econometrics, 132, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. (1993). Time series models. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, M. (1996). Time-series-based econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hecq, A. (2009). Asymmetric business cycle co-movements. Applied Economics Letters, 16, 579–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Hallett, A. J., & Richter, C. (2004). A Time-Frequency Analysis of the Coherences of the US Business Cycle and the European Business Cycle, No. 4751, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Hallett, A. J., & Richter, C. (2008). Have the Eurozone economies converged on a common European cycle. International Economics and Economic Policy, 5, 71–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2013). World economic outlook. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janacek, G., & Swift, L. (1993). Time Series: Forecasting, Simulation, Applications, Ellis Horwood, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. V., & Selover, D. (1999). Mode-locking and international business cycle transmission. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23, 591–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapounek, S., & Pomënková, J. (2010). Business Cycle Development in Czech And Slovak Economies, Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brașov, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. H., & Saiki, A. (2014). Business cycle synchronization and vertical trade integration: A case study of the Eurozone and East Asia, WP 407, Netherlands Central Bank Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maršálek, R., & Pomënková, J. (2010). Spectral analysis of the cyclical behaving of the Czech republic industrial production. Forum Statisticum Slovacum, 2, 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maršálek, R., & Pomënková, J. (2011). Time and frequency domain in the business cycle structure, WP 7, MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medhioub, I. (2010). Business cycle synchronization: A mediterranean comparison, WP 527, Economic Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, R., & Sarte, P. D. (2005). How well do diffusion indexes capture business cycles? A Spectral Analysis, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. B. (1981). Spectral analysis and time series, I and II, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakko (2004). A spectral analysis of the cross-country consumption correlation puzzle, WP 2003–023B, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki, A. (2018). Business cycle synchronization and vertical trade integration: A case study of the Eurozone and East Asia. Global Economy Journal, 18, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiao, G. C., & Tsay, R. S. (1994). Some advances in non-linear and adaptive modelling in time-series. Journal of Forecasting Special Issue on Time Series Advances in Economic Forecasting, 13, 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetman, J. (2011). Exporting recessions: International links and the business cycle. Economics Letters, 110, 12–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, C. (1997). International real business cycles among heterogeneous countries. European Economic Review, 41, 319–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Economics Cycle Research Institute (ECRI), New York, for providing the data used in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vineeta Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dua, P., Sharma, V. (2023). International Synchronization of Growth Rate Cycles: An Analysis in Frequency Domain. In: Dua, P. (eds) Macroeconometric Methods. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7592-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation