Predicate Logic Network: Vision Concept Formation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence Logic and Applications (AILA 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1657))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 306 Accesses

Abstract

Although deep learning has shown good performance in many fields, it still lacks the most basic human intelligence, which we often called the ability to draw inferences about other cases from one instance. Therefore, how to empower model with logical reasoning ability has received much attention. Thus, we propose neural predicate networks, a model that combines deep learning methods with first-order logic. It converts visual tasks into first-order logic problems by deconstructing them into objects, concepts and relations. Then, achieve first-order logic differentiable by learning logical predicates as neural networks. Finally, the differentiable model can be trained by back propagation to simulate the formation of concepts in the human brain and solve the problem. Experimental results on two image concept classification datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stammer, W., Schramowski, P., Kersting, K.: Right for the right concept: revising neuro-symbolic concepts by interacting with their explanations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3619–3629 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Raedt, L., Dumancic, S., Manhaeve, R., Marram, G.: From statistical relational to neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2020), pp. 4943–4950 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Krieken, E., Acar, E., van Harmelen, F.: Analyzing differentiable fuzzy logic operators. Artif. Intell. 302, 103602 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bengio, Y.: From system 1 deep learning to system 2 deep learning. In: Thirty-third Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dehaene, S.: How we learn: why brains learn better than any machine... for now. Penguin (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, Z., Zheng, Y., Tang, H., Zhou, H.: Variational deep embedding: an unsupervised and generative approach to clustering. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1965–1972 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hohenecker, P., Lukasiewicz, T.: Ontology reasoning with deep neural networks. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 68, 503–540 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Makni, B., Hendler, J.: Deep learning for noise-tolerant RDFS reasoning. Semantic Web 10(5), 823–862 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, J., et al.: Inferring and executing programs for visual reasoning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2989–2998 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yi, K., Wu, J., Gan, C., Torralba, A., Kohli, P., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Neural-symbolic VQA: disentangling reasoning from vision and language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1039–1050 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, F., Yang, Z., Cohen, W.W.: Differentiable learning of logical rules for knowledge base reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2316–2325 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dong, H., Mao, J., Lin, T., Wang, C., Li, L., Zhou, D.: Neural logic machines. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shi, S., Chen, H., Ma, W., Mao, J., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y.: Neural logic reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 1365–1374 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Locatello, F., et al.: Object-centric learning with slot attention. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 11525–11538 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, J., Tenenbaum, J.B., Kohli, P.: Neural scene de-rendering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 699–707 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thoma, S., Rettinger, A., Both, F.: Towards holistic concept representations: embedding relational knowledge, visual attributes, and distributional word semantics. In: d’Amato, C., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10587, pp. 694–710. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68288-4_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mascharka, D., Tran, P., Soklaski, R., Majumdar, A.: Transparency by design: closing the gap between performance and interpretability in visual reasoning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 4942–4950 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hudson, D.A, Manning, C.D.: Compositional attention networks for machine reasoning. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mao, J., Gan, C., Kohli, P., Tenenbaum, J.B., Wu, J.: The neuro-symbolic concept learner: Interpreting scenes, words, and sentences from natural supervision. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yi, K., et al.: CLEVRER: collision events for video representation and reasoning. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the Natural Science Found of China (61906066), and supported in part by the Zhejiang Provincial Education Department Scientific Research Project (Y202044192), Huzhou University Research and Innovation Fund (2022KYCX43).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maonian Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, B., Wu, M., Zheng, B., Zhu, S., Peng, W. (2022). Predicate Logic Network: Vision Concept Formation. In: Chen, Y., Zhang, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Logic and Applications. AILA 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1657. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7510-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7510-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7509-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7510-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation