Regulation Tomorrow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizing-for-Innovation

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation ((PLBI))

  • 236 Accesses

Abstract

One significant obstacle in establishing the sustainable business ecosystems described in the previous chapter is the regulatory environment. Too often, the law and other forms of regulation distort incentives for good actors and fail to respond effectively against the bad ones. This is hardly surprising. Much of the regulatory environment is designed for an old world of centralized and hierarchical corporations and the mitigation of information asymmetries and agency risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cheffins (2013).

  2. 2.

    See, e.g., Bainbridge (2008) and McCahery et al (2013).

  3. 3.

    Armour and McCahery (2006).

  4. 4.

    See Cohen (1991).

  5. 5.

    See Braithwaite and Drahos (2000).

  6. 6.

    See Fenwick (2016).

  7. 7.

    Calliess and Zumbansen (2010).

  8. 8.

    Noonan (2015).

  9. 9.

    See Chen and Soltes (2018).

  10. 10.

    Fenwick and Vermeulen (2019).

  11. 11.

    Baudrillard (1994, p. 2).

  12. 12.

    See Moses (2013).

  13. 13.

    See McGrath (2013).

  14. 14.

    Allenby (2011, p. 3).

  15. 15.

    Butenko and Larouche (2015, p. 66).

  16. 16.

    See, e.g., Marchant et al. (2011) and Pearl (2016).

  17. 17.

    Marchant and Wallach (2011, p. 136).

  18. 18.

    See Callon et al. (2009).

  19. 19.

    See Arbesman (2017).

  20. 20.

    Schumpeter (1962, pp. 83–84).

  21. 21.

    Popper (2003, p. 86).

  22. 22.

    See Carson (2015).

  23. 23.

    See Garber (2014).

  24. 24.

    See Baker (2014).

  25. 25.

    See Kahn and Sunstein (2005).

  26. 26.

    See Farkas and Schou (2019).

  27. 27.

    See Arbesman (2017).

  28. 28.

    Davies (2016).

  29. 29.

    See Seib (2016).

  30. 30.

    See Kirchner et al. (2005).

  31. 31.

    Callon et al (2009).

  32. 32.

    Calliess and Zumbansen (2010).

  33. 33.

    Popper (1961, p. 46).

  34. 34.

    See Black (2008).

  35. 35.

    Black (2005, p. 196).

  36. 36.

    See Fenwick et al. (2019).

  37. 37.

    See Zetzsche et al. (2017).

  38. 38.

    See Financial Conduct Authority (2015).

  39. 39.

    See Fenwick et al. (2020).

  40. 40.

    See Fenwick et al. (2017a, b).

  41. 41.

    See Kaal and Vermeulen (2017).

References

  • Allenby BA (2011) The dynamics of emerging technology systems. In: Marchant GE, Abbot KW, Allenby B (eds) Innovative governance models for emerging technologies. Edward Elgar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbesman S (2017) Overcomplicated: technology at the limits of comprehension. Portforlio, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour J, McCahery JA (2006) After enron: improving corporate law and modernising securities law in Europe and the US. Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2006–7. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=910205. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Bainbridge SM (2008) The new corporate governance in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker D (2014) Airbnb taxes regulation (27 May 2014) Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/27/airbnb-uber-taxes-regulation. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Baudrillard J (1994) Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Black J (2005) Proceduralisation and polycentric regulation 1 Especial 99–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Black J (2008) Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers. https://www.lse.ac.uk/law/working-paper-series/2007-08/WPS2008-13-Black.pdf. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Braithwaite J, Drahos P (2000) Global business regulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butenko A, Larouche P (2015) Regulation for innovativeness or regulation of innovation? Law Innov Technol 7(1):52–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calliess GP, Zumbansen P (2010) Rough consensus and running code: a theory of transnational private law. Hart Macmillan, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Lasoumes P, Barthe Y (2009) Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson B (2015) The fight between Airbnb and San Francisco just got nastier (15 May 2015) Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/san-francisco-report-blames-airbnb-for-housing-shortage-airbnb-strikes-back-2015–5http://www.businessinsider.com/san-francisco-report-blames-airbnb-for-housing-shortage-airbnb-strikes-back-2015–5. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffins B (2013) The history of corporate governance. In: Wright M, Siegel D, Keasey K, Filatotchev I (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 46–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Soltes E (2018) Why compliance programs fail and how to fix them (March 2018) Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/03/why-compliance-programs-fail. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Cohen S (1991) Visions of social control. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies W (2016) The age of post truth politics (24 August 2016) New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Farkas J, Schou J (2019) Post-truth, fake news and democracy: map** the politics of falsehood. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick M (2016) The new corporate criminal law and transnational legal risk. In: Fenwick M (ed) Flexibility in modern business law: a comparative assessment. Springer, London, pp 149–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick M, Kaal WA, Vermeulen EPM (2017a) Regulation tomorrow: or, what happens when technology is faster than the law. Am Univ Bus Law Rev 6(3):561–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick M, Kaal WA, Vermeulen EPM (2017b) The lawyer of the future as transaction engineer. In: Corrales M, Fenwick M, Haapio H (eds) Legal tech, smart contracts and blockchain. Springer, Singapore, pp 253–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick M, Siems M, Wrbka S (eds) (2019) The changing meaning of legal certainty. In contemporary comparative and transnational law. Hart Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick M, Van Uytsel S, Ying B (2020) Regulating fintech in Asia: global context, local perspectives. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Conduct Authority (2015) Regulatory sandbox. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/regulatory-sandbox.pdf. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Garber M (2014) After Uber, San Francisco has seen a 65% decline in cab use (17 September 2014) Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/09/what-uber-is-doing-to-cabs-in-san-francisco-in-1-crazy-chart/380378/. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Kaal WA, Vermeulen EPM (2017) How to regulate disruptive innovation: from facts to data Jurimetrics. J Law. Sci Technol 57:169–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn RW, Sunstein CR (2005) The precautionary principle as a basis for decision making. Econ Voice 2:1553–1573

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner C, Painter RW, Kaal WA (2005) Regulatory competition in EU corporate law after inspire art: unbundling Delaware’s product for Europe. Eur Company Financ Law Rev 2(2):159–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant GE, Abbot KW, Allenby B (eds) (2011) Innovative governance models for emerging technologies. Edward Elgar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant GE, Wallach W (2011) The governance of emerging technologies. In: Marchant G, Abbot KW, Allenby B (eds) Innovative governance models for emerging technologies. Edward Elgar, London, pp 136–158

    Google Scholar 

  • McCahery JA, Vermeulen EPM, Hisatake M (2013) The present and future of corporate governance: re-examining the role of the board of directors and investor relations in listed companies. Eur Corp Fin Law Rev 10(1):117–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath R (2013) The pace of technology adoption is speeding up (November 2013) Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2013/11/the-pace-of-technology-adoption-is-speeding-up. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Moses LB (2013) How to think about law, regulation and technology: problems with technology as a regulatory target. Law Innov Technol 5(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan L (2015) Banks face pushback over surging compliance and regulatory costs (28 May 2015) Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/e1323e18-0478-11e5-95ad-00144feabdc0#axzz3jN2kPKMc. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Pearl TH (2016) Fast & furious: the misregulation of driverless cars. SSRN Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2819473. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Popper KR (1961) The poverty of historicism, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper SW (2003) Technological change and the challenges for 21st century governance. Association for the Advancement of Science. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/ch8.pdf. Accessed on 20 Oct 2022

  • Schumpeter JA (1962) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Seib GF (2016) Behind the rise of populism (20 January 2016) Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-the-rise-of-populism-economic-angst-1453199402. Accessed on 20 Oct 2021

  • Zetzsche DA, Buckley RP, Arner DW, Barberis JN (2017) Regulating a revolution: from regulatory sandboxes to smart regulation. Fordham J Corp Fin Law 23(1):31–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Fenwick .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fenwick, M., Vermeulen, E.P.M., Kono, T., Joubert, T. (2023). Regulation Tomorrow. In: Organizing-for-Innovation. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7234-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7234-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7233-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7234-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation