Abstract
A researcher is a loco pilot of innovative medicine. A researcher must fulfill some basic necessities to conduct a significant and reliable research study. A good researcher must be unbiased in publishing his results, even if they are negative or do not support the hypothesis. The present chapter aims to provide an overview of develo** a good research environment and overcoming the challenges of providing adequate infrastructure.
Success demands a high level of logistical and organizational competence
George S. Patton Jr.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stefanadis CI. Characteristics of the good researcher: innate talent or acquired skills? Hellenic J Cardiol. 2006;47:52–3.
Rumman AAA, Alheet AF. The role of researcher competencies in delivering successful research. Inf Knowl Manag. 2019;9(1):29–32.
Cheruvelil KS, Soranno PA, Weathers KC, Hanson PC, Goring SJ, Filstrup CT, et al. Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Front Ecol Environ. 2014;12(1):31–8.
Willenberg KM. Attributes of successful leaders in research. Res Manag Rev. 2014;20(1):n1.
Shmatko NJF. Researchers’ competencies in the coming decade: attitudes towards and expectations of the Russian innovation system. Foresight. 2016;18(3):340–54.
Lawrence TB, Mauws MK, Dyck B, Kleysen RF. The politics of organizational learning: integrating power into the 4I framework. Acad Manage Rev. 2005;30(1):180–91.
Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE. An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manage Rev. 1999;24(3):522–37.
Légaré F, Borduas F, MacLeod T, Sketris I, Campbell B, Jacques AJ. Partnerships for knowledge translation and exchange in the context of continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31(3):181–7.
Ellen ME, Lavis JN, Ouimet M, Grimshaw J, Bédard P-O. Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–5.
Ryu C, Kim YJ, Chaudhury A, Rao HR. Knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing, and learning-from-others. Manag Inf Syst Q. 2005;29:245–78.
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians’ behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22(4):237–43.
Grazier KL, Trochim WM, Dilts DM, Kirk R. Estimating return on investment in translational research: methods and protocols. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(4):478–91.
De Giacomo O. Societal impact of research infrastructures final protocol. Accelerating Europe’s leading research infrastructures. Brussels: European Commission; 2019.
Raftery J, Hanney S, Greenhalgh T, Glover M, Blatch-Jones A. Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(76):1–254.
Zakaria S, Grant J, Luff J. Fundamental challenges in assessing the impact of research infrastructure. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):1–9.
Kok MO, Schuit AJ. Contribution map**: a method for map** the contribution of research to enhance its impact. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10(1):1–16.
Cohen G, Schroeder J, Newson R, King L, Rychetnik L, Milat AJ, et al. Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: testing a new impact assessment tool. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):1–12.
Graham KE, Chorzempa HL, Valentine PA, Magnan JJRE. Evaluating health research impact: development and implementation of the Alberta Innovates–Health Solutions impact framework. Res Eval. 2012;21(5):354–67.
Donovan C. The Australian Research Quality Framework: a live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental, and cultural returns of publicly funded research. New Dir Eval. 2008;2008(118):47–60.
Cruz Rivera S, Kyte DG, Aiyegbusi OL, Keeley TJ, Calvert MJ. Assessing the impact of healthcare research: a systematic review of methodological frameworks. PLoS Med. 2017;14(8):e1002370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singaravelu, S.L.D. (2023). Proving the Competency of the Researcher and the Adequacy of the Infrastructure to Carry Out the Research. In: Parija, S.C., Kate, V. (eds) Grant writing for medical and healthcare professionals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7018-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7018-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7017-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7018-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)