Pawn or Agent in the Lifelong Learning Agenda

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook on Education Development in the Asia-Pacific
  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

National policy agendas for lifelong learning place responsibility for learning as a lifelong endeavor at the feet of individual learners. ‘Failure’ in the labor market – unemployment, underemployment, not achieving progression, or successful switching of careers – is seen as an outcome of an individual’s decisions about education and training. That is, it is individual actions and decisions that are perceived as being entirely in the control of the individual, as it is for individuals to invest in their development to increase their capacity. Those who do not meet this expected undertaking are labeled variously as having ‘gaps’ in their skills and knowledge, and/or as non-learners, as a problem that either needs addressing or is of the individual’s making. Lifelong learning is positioned as a state of mind. This is a very human capital perspective commonly used by government and enterprises alike. Individuals are simultaneously pawns expected to exercise particular kinds of agency, assumed to be operating on a level playing field. Despite even the best of government provision of funding and places, it is no surprise that not all opportunities are equal.

Genuine opportunities are denied to many depending on their circumstances and biographies. Race, class, gender, income, access to childcare, cost of transport, options offered by accessible institutions, being part of a supportive workplace, the nature and design of the work individuals are engaged in: these and more mediate chances to participate actively and meaningfully in lifelong learning. Debates about the realities of lifelong learning addressing inclusion and equity issues are not new. So how to conceive of lifelong learning beyond, for example, government support for places in educational institutions, and who the players are that have a role in contributing to genuine opportunities for lifelong learning? Learning conceived of as social practices brings a focus to individuals’ potential, their genuine opportunities through their biographies, and the contexts in which they live and work. These perspectives position lifelong learning very differently, with different foci, intent, and creation of possibilities for individuals, collectives, and a nation. This conceptual chapter aims to address what a different conception and positioning of lifelong learning ‘looks like,’ and what it might mean for different players.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avis, J. (2000). Policy talk: Reflexive modernization and the construction of teaching and learning within post-compulsory education and lifelong learning in England. Journal of Education Policy, 15(2), 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, X., Bound, H., Mohamed, F., Cai, V., & Chuen, K. H. (2020). Understanding adult learners’ sense-making to inform pedagogical innovations in blended learning (BL). Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited, Assessment & Evaluation. Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., & Chia, A. (2020). The 6 Principles of Learning Design Designing learning for performance. A practitioner note. Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., & Lin, M. (2013). Develo** competence at work. Vocations and Learning, 6(3), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., & Tan, S. C. (2020). Dialogical inquiry A short guide to teaching using a dialogical inquiry approach. Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., & Yap, C. (2021). Reconceptualising “develo** competence at work” to a journey of being and becoming. In U. Bollmann & G. Boustras (Eds.), Safety and Health Competences: A Guide for a Culture of Prevention. CRC PRESS, Taylor & Francis (part of the series ‘The Interface of Safety and Security - George Boustras’).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., Sadik, S., & Karmel, A. (2015). Develo** non-permanent workers in Singapore. IAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., Chia, A., & Karmel, A. (2016). Assessment for the changing nature of work. Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., Sadik, S., Evans, K., & Karmel, A. (2019a). How non-permanent workers learn and develop challenges and opportunities. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., Chee, T. S., Chow, A., **nghua, W., & Hui, C. K. (2019b). Dialogical Teaching: Investigating awareness of inquiry and knowledge co-construction among adult learners engaged in dialogic inquiry and knowledge (co)construction. Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, H., Lim W. Y., & Tan, P. L. (2022). Foregrounding conceptions of learners’ contexts, identities, and what it means to be future-oriented. In Flip** the Lens from teaching to Learning: Pedagogies for future-oriented learners. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2011). The Global Auction. The broken promises of education, jobs, and incomes. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Lauder, H., Sadik, S., & Sung, J. (2018). Towards a ‘Wealth of Talent’ Talent management in dynamic times. Research Note. Institute for Adult Learning, Singapore University of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A., Karmel, A., & Bound, H. (2016). Assessment for the changing nature of work: Training cooks for menu change in a restaurant chain. Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A., Yang, S. A., & A & Lee, M. (2019). Innovative learning cultures in SMEs. Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for The European Communities. (2000). Memorandum on lifelong learning. (Brussels, 30 October, SEK (2000) 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, J. (2008). Lifelong learning and the new economy: Sorting through the rhetoric. In D. W. Livingstone, K. Mirchandani, & P. Sawchuk (Eds.), The future of lifelong learning and work. Critical perspectives (pp. 47–58). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, R. (2018). Economics and the political economy of adult education. In I. M. Milana, S. Webb, J. Holford, R. Waller, & P. Jarvis (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning (pp. 211–226). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and Identity at Work. SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ecclestone, K. (2009). Lost and found in transition Educational implications of concerns about ‘identify’, ‘agency’ and ‘structure’. In J. Field, J. Gallacher, & R. Ingram (Eds.), Researching transitions in lifelong learning (pp. 9–27). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures Education, technology and social change. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2008). Learning on the line: Skills, sociality and solidarity among garment workers. In D. W. Livingstone, K. Mirchandani, & P. Sawchuk (Eds.), The future of lifelong. Learning & work (pp. 185–199). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harteis, C. (2019). Supporting learning at work in an era of digitalisation of work. In A. Bahl & A. Dietzen (Eds.), Work-based learning as a pathway to competence-based education (pp. 85–97). A UNEVOC Network Contribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, G. (2013). Workplace identity, transition and the role of learning. In P. Gibbs (Ed.), Learning, work and practice: New understandings (pp. 51–69). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (Ed.). (2011). The Routledge international handbook of lifelong learning. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Morris, M. (2016). Lifelong learning, income inequality and social mobility in Singapore. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 35(3), 286–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim Wei Ying, Rebekah. (2017). Discussion paper: Towards mastery – Operationalizing identity development and implications for skills future. Paper presented at IAL Expert Roundtable (20th to 24thMar, 2017), Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. W., Mirchandani, K., & Sawchuk, P. (2008). Introduction: Critical perspectives on learning and work in turbulent times. In D. W. Livingstone, K. Mirchandani, & P. Sawchuk (Eds.), The Future of Lifelong Learning and Work (pp. 1–10). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, K., et al. (2008). The paradox of training and learning in a culture of contingency. In D. W. Livingstone, K. Mirchandani, & P. Sawchuk (Eds.), The future of lifelong. Learning & work (pp. 171–184). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3 May–June), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, C. (2017). Enhancing learning in the workplace. Paper presented at IAL Expert Roundtable (20th to 24thMar, 2017), Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G. (2011). The political economy of adult education. In K. Rubenson (Ed.), Adult learning and education (pp. 259–264). Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadik, S., Bound, H., Karmel, A., & Sivalingham, M. (2014). Masters of their destiny? Identities, learning & development of freelance workers in Singapore’s technical theatre industry. Institute for Adult Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawchuk, P. (2008). Lifelong learning and work as ‘value’ production: Combining work and learning analysis from a cultural historical perspective. In D. W. Livingstone, K. Mirchandani, & P. Sawchuk (Eds.), The Future of Lifelong. learning & work (pp. 73–83). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, T. (2018). Adult education and the ‘learning’ turn. In M. Milana, S. Webb, J. Holford, R. Waller, & P. Jarvis (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook on Adult and lifelong Education and Learning (pp. 111–132). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), Quality of life (pp. 30–53). Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). One two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S., & Warren, S. (2009). Who is the ‘responsible learner’? Viewing learning careers through social narratives and recursive methodology. In J. Field, J. Gallacher, & R. Ingram (Eds.), Researching transitions in lifelong learning (pp. 50–64). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2009). The limits of competency-based training and the implications for work. In J. G. Field & R. Ingram (Eds.), Researching transitions in lifelong learning (pp. 201–212). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Bound .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bound, H. (2023). Pawn or Agent in the Lifelong Learning Agenda. In: Lee, W.O., Brown, P., Goodwin, A.L., Green, A. (eds) International Handbook on Education Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6887-7_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation