Cultural Landscape Modelling: A Practical Approach for Evaluating Sustainability. The Historic Village “Maymand” in Iran

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Placemaking and Cultural Landscapes

Abstract

The rural landscapes are particular due to cultural characteristics. As local residents in rural areas tend to use modern technology, the preservation of cultural values and natural attractions should not be underestimated. There are many criteria which must be considered to achieve sustainability. The research aims to answer the question: “How landscape sustainability is affected by culture, economy and qualities of natural resources?” This research will focus on rural landscapes investigating a sustainable approach to the relationships between people and nature. The case study—Maymand—has been continuously inhabited between 2000 and 3000 years which makes it one of Iran’s oldest villages. It consists of several natural and man-made caves that are still used today for housing and sheltering. The rural landscape characteristics in this village were studied to find the signs of sustainability. Using Pasture landscape and agricultural landscape for livestock and planting simultaneously has led to ecological-economical sustainability in this rural landscape. Finally, the research revealed that rich cultures, the traditional manner of life and the biodiversity of the landscapes are the main causes of sustainability within this rural cultural landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future? rural landscapes: past processes and future strategies. Landscape Urban Plann J 70(1–2):21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2006) Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landscape Urban Plann J 75(3–4):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardalan N (2000) Sense of unity. Khak Press, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Azari Dehkordi F (2012) Landscape degradation modelling: an environmental impact assessment for rural landscape prioritisation. Landscape Res 37(5):613–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Banski J, Wesolowska M (2010) Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland’s Lublin region—Influence on the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics. Landscape Urban Plann J 94(2):116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S et al (2009) Management of cultural landscapes: what does this mean in the former Soviet Union? A case study from Latvia. Landsc Res 34(4):425–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson J, Roe M (2007) Landscape and sustainability. Taylor & Francis, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J, Kienast F (2010) Landscape functions in a changing environment. Landscape Online 21(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, et al (2000) Multifunctional landscapes: interdisciplinary approaches to landscape research and management. Conference material for the international conference on “Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management”. Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RD et al (2008) Cultural patterns as a component of environmental planning and design, Chapter 24. In: Hong K et al (eds) Landscape ecological applications in man influenced areas: linking man and nature systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 395–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler-Natour C, Herzog C (1999) Criteria for sustainability and their application at a regional level: the case of clearing islands in the Cubener Heide nature park (Eastern Germany). Landscape Urban Plann J 46(1–3):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke A, Elliott M (2008) IRAN: Meymand. Lonely Planet, Iran, p 310

    Google Scholar 

  • Conzen MP (2001) Cultural landscape in geography. In: Smelser N and Paul Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, vol. 5. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 3086–3092

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage (2002) Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Wales. Countryside Agency, SNH, Battleby

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneshdoust Y (2007) Islamic Gardens in Iran. Chapter 3 (Tehran)

    Google Scholar 

  • Domona G (2011) Landscape as resource: consequences, challenges and opportunities for rural development. Landscape Urban Plann J 100(4):338–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernoult A et al (2003) Patterns of organization in changing landscapes: implications for the management diversity. Landscape Ecol 18(3):239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina A (2006) Principles and methods in landscape ecology: towards a science of the landscape. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frajer J, Fiedor D (2021) A historical curiosity or a source of accurate spatial information on historical land use? Land Use Policy 100:1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB, Bellot J (1999) Systems analysis as a tool for rural planning. Rural Planning from an Environmental Systems Perspective. Springer, New York, pp 315–343

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanachi P, Mehrdad M (2007) Politics, patterns and restoration samples in Meymand rural texture. Fine Arts Journal 30(1):53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2012) Culture, heritage and representation: perspectives on visuality and the past. Landsc Res 37(3):391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iravani MR, Pourkhosravani M (2011) The role of geomorphic unites in forming tourism village of Meymand in Babak Town. Int J Bus Humanit Technol 1(2):150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Izadpanah F (2002) Architectural studies of Meymand historic village. Meymand cultural heritage site, pp 20–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG (2005) Landscape ecology in land-use planning. In: Wiens J, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 316–328

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JE et al (2007) Landscape ecological applications in man influenced areas linking man and nature systems (chapter 29). In: Hong SK et al (eds) International trends of rural landscape researches for land management and policies. Springer Press, Dordrecht, pp 489–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowkabi L et. al (2013) The Application of Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making to Prioritize the Landscapes with high Ecological value: Khoshk River in Shiraz. International Journal of Environmental Research, 7(2): 423–434. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijer.2013.621

  • Kowkabi L (2020) The fundamental characteristics of the rural landscape through application of grounded theory (case study: historic village of Furg). J Environ Stud 45(4):693–709. https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2020.295707.1007968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowkabi L (2021) Revitalization of bio infrastructure network, an approach to urban regeneration: a case study of the qanats of Tehran. Urban For Urban Greening 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127020

  • Kowkabi L, Akrami G (2021) The localization of sustainable landscape indicators in Iranian rural ecosystem based on the mental-evaluative images of stakeholders. J Rural Res 11(4):728–745. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2020.299366.1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowkabi L, Badri S (2020) Explaining sustainable landscape indicators in the rural area of Iran based on experts’ and professionals’ assessment. J Rural Res 11(1):50–65. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2019.277942.1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafortezza R, Brown RD (2004) A framework for landscape ecological design of new patches in the rural landscape. Environ Manage 34(4):461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher F et al (2013) Planning rural landscapes: a participatory approach to analyse future scenarios in Monferrato Astigiano, Piedmont, Italy. Landscape Research 38(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieskovsky J et al (2014) Factors affecting the persistence of traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia during the collectivization of agriculture. Landscape Ecol 29:867–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0023-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin L (2005) The symbol of water in Quran. Art, Tehran, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavromatidis LE (2012) The aesthetic value of socio-cultural identities and the cultural dimension of the landscape. Hum Geogr 6(2):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss MR (2000) Inter-disciplinarity, landscape ecology and the transformation of agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 15(3):303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Wascher DM (2007) The globalized landscape: rural landscape change and policy in the United States and European Union. In: Wescoat J, Johnston D (eds) Political economies of landscape change. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 169–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1997) Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. In: Nassuer JI (ed) Placing nature: culture and landscape ecology. Island Press, Covelo, pp 65–83

    Google Scholar 

  • National Geographical Organization (2002) Kerman-Shahr Babak. In: Kerman National Gazetteer of Iran (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2001) Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape Urban Planning J 57(3–4):269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikpour M et al (2011) Investigating the role of nature elements in the central courtyards of traditional Iranian houses in hot and dry regions, recent researches in energy. Environ Landscape Archit 1:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Center of Mymand site (2006) Handbook. Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang H et al (2005) The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol 20(6):645–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsi F (2008) Climatic areas in Iranian architecture. Architecture 48(1):112–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Correia T et al (2006) Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions-towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management. Landscape Ecol 21(3):333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T et al (2016) The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: a systematic review of the evidence. Land Use Policy 57:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed M et al (2017) A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology 26 (1): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541

  • Rippon S (2012) Historic landscape character and sense of place. Landsc Res 37:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A (1986) An emerging paradigm for landscape architecture. Landsc J 5(2):75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman P, Swanwick C (2010) On the meaning of natural beauty in landscape legislation. Landsc Res 35(1):3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman P (2009) Landscape multi-functionality. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 5(2):45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Simensen T, Halvorsen R, Erikstad L (2018) Methods for landscape characterisation and map**: a systematic review. Land Use Policy 75:557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick C (2002) Landscape character assessment: guidance for England and Scotland. The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Talandier M (2009) Mesurer l’impact des aménités naturelles, culturelles et environnementales sur le développement économique local, XLVIe Colloque ASRDLF, Clermont-Ferrand. Available at http://www.asrdlf2009.com/propositions/final/upload-final/talandier.pdf.

  • Taylor K, Lennon J (2012) Managing cultural landscapes. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tress B et al (2005) Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landsc Urban Plan 70:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaziri Kermani AA (1981) The history of Kerman. Elmi Press, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldhardt R et al (2003) Floristic diversity at the habitat scale in agricultural landscapes of Central Europe- Summary, conclusions and perspectives. Agric Ecosyst Environ J 98(1):79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon Y (2002) Development of a structural model for tourism destination competitiveness from stakeholders’ perspectives. Doctoral Dissertation in Hospitality and Tourism Management, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao HZ et al (2021) Incorporating spatio-temporal connectivity for prioritized conservation of individual habitat patches in a dynamic landscape. Ecol Ind 124:1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107414

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author specially thanks Dr. Nasrin Kowkabi, from the Department of Language and Literacy Education at the University of British Columbia for her valuable comments on final editing of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leila Kowkabi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kowkabi, L. (2023). Cultural Landscape Modelling: A Practical Approach for Evaluating Sustainability. The Historic Village “Maymand” in Iran. In: Singh, R.P.B., Niglio, O., Rana, P.S. (eds) Placemaking and Cultural Landscapes. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6274-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation