SpringerLink
Log in

Intersectionality: Introduction

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Disability

  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

Intersectionality has been taken up uncritically in contemporary scholarship via an additive model where disability is merely added to other categories of difference, with an emphasis on a limiting essentialized understanding of identity. In this introductory chapter, we carefully delineate our understanding of intersectionality as a conceptual framework before we apply this understanding to critical disability studies. Drawing on Kimberlé Crenshaw’s classic essay, Map** the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence against Women of Color, we argue that deploying an intersectional framework foregrounds the epistemic erasure of disability by other discourses of social difference and the epistemic labor of disability when it is constitutive of other categories of difference. In the final section of this chapter we showcase contemporary scholarship on intersectionality and disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. Translated by Kavin Attell. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annamma, S. A. (2017). The pedagogy of pathologization: Dis/abled girls of color in the school-prison nexus. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Annamma, S. A., Ferri, B., & Connor, D. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldua, G. (Ed.). (1990). Making face, making soul: haciendo caras: creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color (First, Ser. Code 02). Aunt Lute Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., Trent, S. C., Osher, D., & Ortiz, A. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 279–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2012). Introducing the ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’ approach. Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2016). Problematizations in health policy: Questioning how “problems” are constituted in policies. Sage Open, 6(2), 2158244016653986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C., & Eveline, J. (2010). Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory (p. 368). University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M., & Mobley, I. A. (2019). Work in the intersections: A Black feminist disability framework. Gender & Society, 33(1), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (2012). Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 12–29). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, P. (2017). Stigma, human rights and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In The stigma of mental illness-end of the story? (pp. 209–223). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (2006). White disability studies: A modest proposal. In L. Davis (ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 275–282).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Moshe, L. (2020). Decarcerating disability: Deinstitutionalization and prison abolition. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2007). Slow death (sovereignty, obesity, lateral agency). Critical Inquiry, 33(4), 754–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasky, T., Gordon, J., Buettgen, A., Hardie, S., Morrow, M., & Rioux, M. (2020). Disability, human rights, access and research to support learning: Literature review and environmental scan. Critical Disability Studies Program in the School of Health Policy and Management at York University and Canadian Centre on Disability Studies Incorporated Operating as Eviance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettgen, A., Hardie, S., Wicklund, E., Jean-François, K. M., & Alimi, S. (2018). Understanding the intersectional forms of discrimination impacting persons with disabilities. Government of Canada’s Social Development Partnerships Program – Disability Component. Canadian Centre on Disability Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. K. (2019) Contours of ableism: The production of disability and ableness. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institutes for Health Research – Institute of Gender and Health. (2018). Science is better with sex and gender: Strategic plan, 2018–2023. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/51310.html

  • Canadian Institutes for Health Research -Institute of Gender and Health. (2012). What a difference sex and gender make: A gender, sex and health research case book. CIHR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbado, D. W. (2013). Colorblind intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 811–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, A. (2010). Postcolonial disaster, pacific nuclearization, and disabling environments. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(3), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, racial mattering, and queer affect. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N. (2016). Red intersectionality and violence-informed witnessing praxis with indigenous girls. Girlhood Studies, 9(2), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combahee River Collective. (1977). The Combahee River collective statement. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/iirp/documents/Combahee%201979.pdf.

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum. University of Chicago Law School, pp. 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Map** the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (1981). Women, race and class (2nd ed.). Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (2002). Bending over backwards: Essays on disability and the body (Vol. 6). NYU Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DisAbled Women’s Network of Canada (DAWN-RAFH). (1988). DAWN Toronto fact sheet on reproductive rights. In R. Roach Pierson, M. G. Cohen, P. Bourne, & P. Masters (Eds.), Canadian women’s issues: Volume I: Strong voices twenty-five years of women’s activism in English Canada (pp. 131–132). James Lorimer & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • DisAbled Women’s Network of Canada (DAWN-RAFH). (2013). Factsheet: Women with disabilities and violence. DisAbled Women’s Network of Canada (DAWN-RAFH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, D., & Bluechardt, M. (2004). Aboriginal people with disabilities: A vacuum in public policy. The Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, D., South, S., & Bluechardt, M. (2006). Urban first nations people with disabilities speak out. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 3(1), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N. (2014a). Thinking with disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4248/3587.

  • Erevelles, N. (2014b). Crippin’ Jim Crow: Disability, dis-location, and the school-to-prison pipeline. In L. Ben-Moshe, C. Chapman, & A. Carey (Eds.), Disability incarcerated: Imprisonment and disability in the United States and Canada (pp. 81–99). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N. (2022). Crippin’ the Long 2020; As if disability matters. In M. Ryan & R. Gruisin (Eds.), The Long 2020. The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N., & Minear, A. (2010). Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability in discourses of intersectionality. Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fem Net North. (2016). Experiences of women with disabilities in Canada’s north: Fem Net North factsheet. The Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women. http://fnn.criaw-icref.ca/images/userfiles/files/WWDsNorth.pdf

  • Ferguson, P. M. (1987). The social construction of mental retardation. Social Policy, 18(1), 51–56. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, K. (2015). Gradations of debility and capacity: Biocapitalism and the neoliberalization of disability relations. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 4(2), 12–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland Thompson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American literature and culture. Columbia UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2005). Feminist disability studies. Signs, 30(2), 1557–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, E., Rioux, M., Mora Severino, S., Moore, M., Williams, L., Simmons, R., Lipscombe, D., McFarlane, C., Vukson, L., & Hostland, E. (2016). Expanding the circle: Monitoring the human rights of indigenous, first nations, aboriginal, init and metis people with disabilities in Canada: Systemic report. Disability Rights Promotion International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma; Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 28(5), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S., & Soldatic, K. (2016). Disability in the global south. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. Q. (2017). Feminist and Queer intersections with disability studies. In The Routledge companion to feminist philosophy (pp. 405–418). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O. (2012). Women’s health, men’s health and gender and health: Implications for intersectionality. Social Science and Medicine, 74(11), 1712–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O. (2022). Women’s health in the twenty-first century. In M. Morrow, O Hankivsky, & C. Varcoe (eds.) Women’s Health in Canada (pp. 13–35). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O., & Zachary, J. (2019). The Palgrave handbook of intersectionality in public policy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783319984728

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O., & Hunting, G. (2022). From gender mainstreaming towards mainstreaming intersectionality. In M. Morrow, O Hankivisky, & C. Varcoe (eds.) Women’s Health in Canada (pp. 186–208). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O., Morrow, M., & Varcoe, C. (2022). Introduction women’s health in Canada: Critical intersectional perspectives on theory and policy. In M. Morrow, O Hankivisky, & C. Varcoe (eds.) Women’s Health in Canada (pp. 1–10). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriet Tubman Collective. (2017). Disability solidarity: Completing the “Vision for Black Lives”. Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill-Collins, P. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill-Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (2013). Fresh fruit, broken bodies: Migrant farmworkers in the United States (Vol. 27). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, B. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. (2013). Decolonizing sex work: Develo** an intersectional indigenous approach. In E. van der Meulen, E. M. Durisin, & V. Love (Eds.), Selling sex: Experience, advocacy, and research on sex work in Canada (pp. 82–100). University of British Columbia Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, K. (1979). Multiple jeopardy: The evolution of a Native women’s movement. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 4(2), 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jampel, C. (2018). Intersections of disability justice, racial justice and environmental justice. Environmental Sociology, 4(1), 122–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, A., & Morrow, M. (forthcoming). Mental health care and policy (in) justice in Ontario: Making intersections visible. Studies in Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josewksi, V., Morrow, M., Batiste, R., Ibrahim, M., & Joseph, A. (forthcoming). British Columbia’s mental health system: Addressing systemic human rights issues. Studies in Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, F., Komiti, A., & Jackson, H. (2008). How does being female assist help-seeking for mental health problems? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, S. (2021). Crip Kinship: The disability justice and art activism of Sins invalid. Arsenal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, K. (2013). Vulnerability, for example: Disability theory as extraordinary demand. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 25(1), 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. B., & Schalk, S. (2021). Reclaiming the radical politics of self-care: A crip-of-color critique. South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(2), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. F. (2019). Learning from my daughter: The value and care of disabled minds. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E., Silvers, A., & Wendell, S. (Eds.). (2001). Special issue on “Feminism and disability,” part I: Introduction. Hypatia, 16(4), vii–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E., Silvers, A., & Wendell, S. (2002). Special issue on “Feminism and disability,” part II: Introduction. Hypatia, 17(1), 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Aunt Lute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, R., & Wilkerson, A. (2003). Introduction: Crip** the (queer) nation. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 9(1/2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A. L. (2019). “Strong Black Women”: African American women with disabilities, intersecting identities, and inequality. Gender & Society, 33(1), 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingus, M. (2017). Access intimacy, interdependence and disability justice. Leaving Evidence, 12. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/access-intimacy-the-missing-link/

  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (1997). The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 Vol, 12/13 (3) Vol. 13 (1) On Humanism and the University I: The Discourse of Humanism, pp. 333–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monture-Angus, P. (1995). Thunder in my Soul: A Mohawk woman speaks. Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. (2015). Black Chicagoans with disabilities, Candace Marie and Tim- otheus Gordon Jr. stand solid in the Windy City. Poor Magazine. December 29. http://poormagazine.org/node/5449.

  • Moore, L. (2017). Krip-hop nation is Moore than music. http://www.wordgath- ering.com/issue22/essays/moore2.html. Accessed 27 August 2017.

  • Morris, J. (1993). Feminism and disability. Feminist Review, 43(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, M. (2022). “Women and Madness” revisted: The promise of intersectional and mad studies frameworks. In M. Morrow, O Hankivisky, & C. Varcoe (eds.) Women’s Health in Canada (pp. 311–330). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (2019). Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, M. D. (2016). Informing Red Power and transforming the second wave: Native American women and the struggle against coerced sterilization in the 1970s. History Review, 25(6), 965–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2004). If I had a hammer: The social model in action. In C. Barnes (Ed.), The social model of disability – Theory and research (pp. 18–31). The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paré, M. (2019). The convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Its contribution to the development of international human rights law. Revista Esmat, 11(17), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, A., Hankivsky, O., Morrow, M., & Greaves, L. (2003). Exploring concepts in gender and health. Health Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickens, T. (2019). Black madness; mad Blackness. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. K. (2005). Queer Times, Queer Assemblages. Social Text, 1 December 2005; 23 (3–4 (84–85)): 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. K. (2009). Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. Women & Performance: a Journal of Feminist Theory, 19(2), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. K. (2012). “I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess”: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. Philosophia, 2(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, A., Poole, N., Morrow, M., Greaves, L., Ingram, R., & Pederson, A. (2006). Integrating sex and gender in mental health and addictions policy: Considerations and recommendations for Federal policy development. BC Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandahl, C., & Auslander, P. (2009). Bodies in commotion: Disability and performance. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, S. (2018). Bodyminds reimagined: (Dis)ability, race, and gender in black women’s speculative fiction. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, S. (2021). Black disability politics. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, M. (2004). Overlaps and contradictions between queer theory and disability studies. Disability & Society, 19(7), 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. (2009). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. (2012). Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 30–41). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, T. (2010). Disability aesthetics (p. 124). University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silvers, A. (1995). Reconciling equality to difference: Caring (f) or justice for people with disabilities. Hypatia, 10(1), 30–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvers, A. (2009). Off! A diverse theory of justice for disability. Disability and disadvantage, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2005). Native American feminism, sovereignty, and social change. Feminist Studies, 31(1), 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. L., & Mitchell, D. T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soldatic, K. (2011). Appointment time: Disability and neoliberal workfare temporalities. Critical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511430168

  • Spears, E. G. (2014). Baptized in PCBs: Race, pollution, and justice in an all-American town. UNC Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, H. J. (1987). Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe: An American grammar book. Diacritics, 17(2), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchkosky, T. (2007). Reading and writing disability differently: The textured life of embodiment. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, S. (2006). On the government of disability. Moral Issues in Global Perspective: Volume 2: Human Diversity and Equality, 2, 307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, S. (2017). Foucault and feminist philosophy of disability. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, S. L. (2021). Philosophy of disability, conceptual engineering, and the nursing home-industrial-complex in Canada. International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies, 10–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truscan, I., & Bourke- Martignon, J. (2016). International human rights law and intersectional discrimination. The Equal Rights Review, 16, 103–131. https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20and%20Intersectional%20Discrimination.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Two-Axe Early, M. (1994). Indian Rights for Indian women. In H. Dagenais & D. Piche (Eds.), Women, feminism and development / Femmes, Féminisme et Développement (pp. 429–433). McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, B., & Swartz, L. (2022). Disability and the problem of lazy intersectionality. Disability & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2130177

  • Wendell, S. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of disability. Hypatia, 4(2), 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. (Ed.). (2020). Disability visibility: First person stories from the 21st century. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. (2022). Year of the Tiger: An activist’s life. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social and Cultural Studies in Education/Department of Education Leadership, Policy and Technology Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA

    Nirmala Erevelles

  2. School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Marina Morrow

Authors
  1. Nirmala Erevelles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina Morrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirmala Erevelles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Marcia H. Rioux

  2. Department of Economics and School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Alexis Buettgen

  3. Department of Anthropology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, NY, USA

    Ezra Zubrow

  4. Advocacy Unit, International Disability Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland

    José Viera

Section Editor information

  1. Schoole of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada

    Marina Morrow

  2. University of York, York, UK

    Nirmala Erevelles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Erevelles, N., Morrow, M. (2024). Intersectionality: Introduction. In: Rioux, M.H., Buettgen, A., Zubrow, E., Viera, J. (eds) Handbook of Disability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6056-7_91

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation