Abstract
The issue of Taiwan’s participation in the international space is mainly reflected in three aspects: “Under What Name”, “Under Which Status” and “To What Extent” Taiwan should participate in international space. The resolution of Taiwan’s participation in the international space can eventually be summed up as the resolution of the three abovementioned questions. On the basis of reviewing international legal documents concerning the Taiwan region and the legal logic behind Taiwan’s orderly participation in the international space, this book proposes to establish a mechanism for Taiwan’s orderly participation in the international space: first, the cross-Strait principle, functional principle and institutional principle for the construction of a framework for peaceful development of cross-Strait relations should be taken as guiding principles; second, in the aspect of basic idea, the problem of Taiwan’s participation in the international space must be integrated with the alignment of cross-Strait political relations; third, the construction of a mechanism for the orderly participation of the Taiwan region in the international space should follow the rules of relevant international laws and adhere to the mode of participation through institutional negotiations; finally, in terms of the specific institutional design, it can be divided into a preparatory discussion mechanism or procedural negotiation mechanism and an official consultation mechanism or substantive consultation mechanism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Chang Chi-hsiung and Zheng Jiaqing, “The International Status of Taiwan’s Participation in the WHO/WHA”, Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica 66 (December 2009).
- 2.
“Palestine Obtained Observer State Status”, data source: http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2012/1201/c70731-19757048.html, the last access date: January 20, 2019.
- 3.
Quoted from Cheng Chang-hsiung, “The Analyzing from Nation Sovereignty to the Mode of Integration Across the Taiwan Strait”, Master’s thesis, Nanhua University Institute of Public Administration and Policy, 2003, 92.
- 4.
Zheng Hailin, Reinterpretation of Taiwan’s Sovereignty, Strait Academic Press, 2000, 271–273.
- 5.
See Chen Litong, Taiwan’s Subjectivity, (Angle Publishing Co., Ltd., 2002), 11–13.
- 6.
See Peng Mingmin and Huang Zhaotang, Taiwan’s Status in International Law, Taiwan Interminds, 1995, 128–129.
- 7.
See Chen Litong, “Competition in International Organizations Under the One-China Principle”, in Taiwan’s Subjectivity, by Chen Litong, Angle Publishing Co., Ltd., 2002.
- 8.
See Chang Ya-chung, Issues of Sovereignty Between Mainland China and Taiwan, Sheng-Chih Book Co., Ltd., 1998, 46.
- 9.
See Lin Zheng-shun, “New Development of the ‘One-China Policy’ and International Law”, Taiwan International Law Quarterly Vol. 3 3 (September 2006).
- 10.
See Ren Donglai, “The American Stance on the Taiwan Status Issue”, Open Times 1 (2003).
- 11.
Luo Qizheng, “Jurisprudential Dispute over the ‘Chinese Representation Issue’ in the United Nations”, Taiwan International Law Quarterly Vol. 3 3 (September 2006).
- 12.
See Joanne Jaw-Ling Chang, “Taiwan’s Participation in the World Health Organization and the Role of the United States”, EurAmerica Vol. 402 (June 2010).
- 13.
See Zhou Yezhong, “On Constructing a Legal Mechanism for the Peaceful Development of Cross-Strait Relations”, Law Review 3 (2008).
- 14.
Zhu Jie, “On the Basic Principles of Cross-Strait Peace Agreement”, One Country Two Systems Research (Macao) 1 (2011).
- 15.
Article 86 of the Havana Charter stipulates: “The Members recognize that the Organization should not attempt to take actions which involve passing judgment in any way in essentially political matters.”
- 16.
See Zhou Yezhong, “On the Legal Mechanism of the Framework for Peaceful Development of Cross-Strait Relations”, Law Review 3 (2008).
- 17.
About the staging and topic-for-discussion methods and their application in the alignment of cross-Strait political relations, see Zhou Yezhong and Zhu Jie, “Views on the Alignment of Cross-Strait Political Relations Between the Mainland and Taiwan”, Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law 3 (2009).
- 18.
“Ministry of Foreign Affairs” of the Taiwan Region, “Position Paper on Entry into the United Nations—Fundamental Rights of the Government of the Republic of China and its People to Participate in the United Nations and Other International Organizations” (April 1994).
- 19.
“Ministry of Foreign Affairs” of the Taiwan Region, “Revisiting the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (1971)—Fundamental Rights of the Government of the Republic of China in Taiwan and its People to Participate in the United Nations and Other International Organizations” (July 1996).
- 20.
“Ministry of Foreign Affairs” of the Taiwan Region, “Position Paper on Entry into the United Nations—Fundamental Rights of the Government of the Republic of China and its People to Participate in the United Nations and Other International Organizations” (April 1994).
- 21.
Jiang Zemin, Continuing to Strive Toward the Reunification of China (1995).
- 22.
The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue (2000).
- 23.
“**’s Report at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China”, data source: http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2017/1028/c64094-29613660.html, the last access date: January 21, 2019.
- 24.
“** Attended the Gathering to Commemorate the 40th Anniversary of Issuing Message to Compatriots in Taiwan and Delivered an Important Speech”, data source: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-01/02/content_5354209.htm, the last access date: January 21, 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhu, J. (2022). Future: Construction of a Mechanism for Taiwan’s Orderly Participation in the International Space. In: Study on the Issue of Taiwan’s Participation in the International Space. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4468-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4468-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4467-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4468-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)