Assessment of Electricity Market Liberalization in CEE Economies: A Multicriteria Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Transition

Abstract

Modern societies are becoming increasingly reliant on stable and secure energy sources to enable economic development. Electricity is inherently tied to economic growth and development, as it is a key determinant of the size and progress of an economy. Electricity markets in CEE economies have been liberalized and deregulated, and these processes are still ongoing. The primary goal of this study is to examine the liberalization and deregulation of the electricity markets in eleven Central and Eastern European EU Member Countries. The PROMETHEE II and Entropy methods are used to analyze five indicators (number of producers, cumulative market share generation, cumulative market share capacity, retailers to final consumers, and cumulative market share in the eleven countries (Bulgaria, The Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, and The Slovak Republic), and the results are compared between 2007 and 2019, allowing for an assessment of overall changes in the electricity markets. The results show that Poland performed best in both analyzed years, while the Czech Republic maintained its second place. Further examination of the structure of CEE electricity markets indicated that supply and demand conditions remain notably different across the majority of the observed countries, signaling that more effort is necessary to integrate these markets into the single EU power market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Radulescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Country Profiles.

See Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.

Fig. 3
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Poland in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of Poland in 2007, b Profile of Poland in 2019

Fig. 4
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of the Czech Republic in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In b, the bar for C M S C lies below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of the Czech Republic in 2007, b Profile of the Czech Republic in 2019

Fig. 5
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Bulgaria in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In a, the bars for R F C and C M S M R lie below the x axis, while in b, the bars for C M S C and R F C lie below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of Bulgaria in 2007, b Profile of Bulgaria in 2019

Fig. 6
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Romania in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In a, the bar for C M S G lies below the x axis, while in b, the bar for P lies below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of Romania in 2007, b Profile of Romania in 2019

Fig. 7
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of the Hungary in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In a, the bar for R F C lies below the x axis, while in b, the bars for C M S C and R F C lie below the x axis.

a Profile of Hungary in 2007, b Profile of Hungary in 2019

Fig. 8
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Lithuania in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In a, the bars for P, C M S G and R F C lie below the x axis, while in b, the bars for P, R F C and C M S M R lie below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of Lithuania in 2007, b Profile of Lithuania in 2019

Fig. 9
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Latvia in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In a, all bars lie below the x axis, while in b, the bars for C M S G, R F C, and C M S M R lie below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of Latvia in 2007, b Profile of Latvia in 2019

Fig. 10
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of the Slovak Republic in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In a, the bars for P and C M S C lie below the x axis, while in b, the bars for P, C M S G, and C M S C lie below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of the Slovak Republic in 2007, b Profile of the Slovak Republic in 2019

Fig. 11
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Estonia in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In a, all bars except R F C lie below the x axis, while in b, all bars except C M S C lie below the x axis.

a Profile of Estonia in 2007, b Profile of Estonia in 2019

Fig. 12
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Croatia in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In both a and b, all bars lie below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of Croatia in 2007, b Profile of Croatia in 2019

Fig. 13
Bar graphs a and b are profiles of Slovenia in 2007 and 2019, respectively. The y axis ranges from negative 1 to 1. Both plot bars for P, C M S G, C M S C, R F C, and C M S M R. In both a and b, all bars lie below the x axis. The bars are of different heights.

a Profile of Slovenia in 2007, b Profile of Slovenia in 2019

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fedajev, A., Radulescu, M., Mitić, P., Bouraoui, T. (2022). Assessment of Electricity Market Liberalization in CEE Economies: A Multicriteria Approach. In: Khan, S.A.R., Panait, M., Puime Guillen, F., Raimi, L. (eds) Energy Transition. Industrial Ecology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3540-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation