Noise Sensitivity of Mode Shape and Mode Shape Difference to Damage Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Material Science and Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 293 Accesses

Abstract

Wavelet transform (WT) has become a reliable tool in detecting damage in structures. Owing to its reliability, various researchers have applied WT to identify singularities in mode shapes and their derivatives to identify damage. Recently, the idea of WT analysis of mode shape differences to detect damage in structures was proposed. This involved applying the difference between the mode shape of the undamaged and damaged structure. In this study, a WT noise sensitivity of mode shapes and mode shape differences to damage detection in plate structures is presented. A numerical model of a square steel plate with different boundary conditions (one, two, and four sides fixed) is applied in this study. The damage is imposed at different locations in the plate models by reducing thickness at the damage locations to mimic corrosion. The damage detectability of both methods is then analyzed and evaluated. The results show that mode shape differences provided better and more accurate detection than mode shapes. The problem of border distortion was visible in the coefficients when mode shape was applied. The parametric analysis showed that mode shape differences performed better when the signals were polluted with noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagheri A et al (2011) Structural damage identification of plates based on modal data using 2D discrete wavelet transform. Struct Eng Mech 1:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim J-T, Yun C-B, Yi J-H (2003) Temperature effects on frequency-based damage detection in plate-girder bridges. KSCE J Civil Eng 6:725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park J-W et al (2015) Development of temperature-robust damage factor based on sensor fusion for a wind turbine structure. Front Struct Civil Eng 1:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai WF, Miang MN, Min YH (2016) Anticipating the logistics companies’ preference on technology adoption: AHP approach. Int’l J Bus Sys Res 2–4:346–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdulkareem M, Ganiyu A, Abd Majid MZ (2019) Damage identification in plate using wavelet transform and artificial neural network. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 1:012015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andreaus U et al (2016) Experimental damage evaluation of open and fatigue cracks of multi‐ cracked beams by using wavelet transform of static response via image analysis. Struct Control Health Monit

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yousefi J et al (2014) Damage categorization of glass/epoxy composite material under mode II delamination using acoustic emission data: a clustering approach to elucidate wavelet transformation analysis. Arab J Sci Eng 2:1325–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdulkareem M, Ganiyu A, Nathaniel O et al (2021) Interval analysis of mode shapes to identify damage in beam structure. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 10:1064–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan HR, Lum KM, Mok VH (2007) Performance evaluation of coifman wavelet for ECG signal denoising. In: 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, pp 419–422

    Google Scholar 

  10. Douka E, Loutridis S, Trochidis A (2004) Crack identification in plates using wavelet analysis. J Sound Vib 1–2:279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quek ST et al (2001) Sensitivity analysis of crack detection in beams by wavelet technique. Int J Mech Sci 12:2899–2910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Umesha P, Ravichandran R, Sivasubramanian K (2009) Crack detection and quantification in beams using wavelets. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 24:593–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rucka M (2011) Damage detection in beams using wavelet transform on higher vibration modes. J Theor Appl Mech 49:399–417

    Google Scholar 

  14. **ang J, Liang M (2012) Wavelet-based detection of beam cracks using modal shape and frequency measurements. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 27:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhong S, Oyadiji SO (2011) Detection of cracks in simply-supported beams by continuous wavelet transform of reconstructed modal data. Comput Struct 89:127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang X, Ma ZJ, Ren WX (2012) Crack detection from the slope of the mode shape using complex continuous wavelet transform. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 27:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nikravesh SMY, Chegini SN (2013) Crack identification in double cracked plates using wavelet analysis. Meccanica 48:2075–2098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy DM, Swarnamani S (2012) Damage detection and identification in structures by spatial wavelet based approach. Int’l J Appl Sci Eng 10:69–87

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu W et al (2015) Two-dimensional curvature mode shape method based on wavelets and teager energy for damage detection in plates. J Sound Vib 347:266–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdulkareem M, Kasali ME et al (2019) Optimal sensor distance for damage detection considering wavelet sensitivity & uncertainties. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 513:012018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vafaei M, Alih SC (2017) Adequacy of first mode shape differences for damage identification of cantilever structures using neural networks. Neural Comput Appl

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mallat S (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rucka M, Wilde K (2006) Application of continuous wavelet transform in vibration based damage detection method for beams and plates. J Sound Vib 297:536–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Computers and structures (2014) i SAP2000. Version 17.1.1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muyideen Abdulkareem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abdulkareem, M., Ganiyu, A. (2023). Noise Sensitivity of Mode Shape and Mode Shape Difference to Damage Detection. In: Emamian, S.S., Awang, M., Razak, J.A., Masset, P.J. (eds) Advances in Material Science and Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3307-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation