Integrating BIM with ERP Systems Towards an Integrated Multi-user Interactive Database: Reverse-BIM Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends in Construction Technology and Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 260))

Abstract

In the context of rapid technological advancements, the Architectural, Engineering and Construction sectors (AEC) are preparing themselves towards the enhanced level of co-ordination. This requires integration at every phase of the construction process, including design, processes, engineering services, fabrication, construction and maintenance phases––all together to help implement Level-3 Building Information Modeling (BIM). In this regard, the current understanding of BIM models is largely restricted to the graphical representation of the services, such as architectural model, structural model, plumbing model, etc. However, such decisions are confined to their respective departments before a ‘blueprint’ is released; for example, a design office may require changes to be incorporated into an architectural drawing or vice-versa. Such conflict of interests or process repetitions, particularly during planning, design and implementation stages, are identified as the main sources of significant delays in the overall project. For an integrated project delivery to overcome the fragmentation or loss of information, this paper proposes an architecture and demonstrates the feasibility of the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system as a method to integrate the BIM processes among different departments that are using a heterogeneous environment of software packages. It is identified that the concept of ERP can be utilized not only to generate a read-only information database, but also rather reversibility in processes can be achieved by develo** an interactive (read and write) database format to reach a consensus-based decision between seemingly scattered departments. A wide range of tasks is identified to be integrated during the planning, design, construction and operation phases. This will eliminate unnecessary time delays, for example, by minimizing or eliminating rotation of ‘blueprints’, enhancing the transfer of knowledge and overcoming the information-fragmentation. With a worked-out example, it is established that the available products on BIM-ERP integration can be expanded to directly integrate structural or other heterogeneous software, but this requires realignment of processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murphy M, McGovern E, Pavia S (2013) Historic Building Information Modelling – Adding intelligence to laser and image based surveys of European classical architecture. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 76:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomsen C, Darrington J, Dunne D (2010) Managing integrated project delivery. Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altun M, Akcamete A (2019) A method for facilitating 4D modeling by automating task information generation and map**. In: Advances in informatics and computing in civil and construction engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 479–486

    Google Scholar 

  4. Antwi-Afari MF, Li H, Pärn EA, Edwards DJ (2018) Critical success factors for implementing building information modelling (BIM): a longitudinal review. Autom Constr 91:100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koo B, Fischer M (2000) Feasibility study of 4D CAD in commercial construction. J Constr Eng Manag 126(4):251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. BIM Industry Working Group (2011) A report for the government construction client group—building information modelling (BIM) working party strategy paper. Communications (March):107

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cdbb (n.d.) GSL 1 Intro—Centre for digital built britain

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hosseini MR, Chileshe N, Zuo J, Baroudi B (2015) Adopting global virtual engineering teams in AEC projects. Constr Innovation 15(2):151–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sackey E, Tuuli M, Dainty A (2015) Sociotechnical systems approach to BIM implementation in a multidisciplinary construction context. J Manag Eng 31(1):A4014005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merschbrock C (2012) Unorchestrated symphony: The case of inter-organizational collaboration in digital construction design. Electron J Inf Technol Constr Royal Inst Technol 17:333–350

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marvy R (2014) What Is BIM Level 3? 3D perspectives. https://blogs.3ds.com/perspectives/what-is-bim-level-3/. 24 Feb 2019

  12. Shalwani A, Lines BC (2020) An empirical analysis of issue management in small building construction projects. Int J Constr Educ Res

    Google Scholar 

  13. Milford M, Stewart G (2000) Are ERP implemenations qualitatively different from other large systems implementations? In: AMCIS 2000 proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen IJ (2001) Planning for ERP systems: analysis and future trend. Bus Process Manage J 7(5):374–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davenport TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Bus Rev 76(4):121–131. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boulder, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar K, Van Hillegersberg J (2000) ERP experiences and evolution. Commun ACM 43(4):22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Leary DE (2000) Enterprise resource planning systems : systems, life cycle, electronic commerce, and risk. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeng Y (2010) PPT—risk management for enterprise resource planning system implementations in project-based firms. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gartner (2001) Enterprise applications- adoption of e-business and document technologies: 2000–2001 Europe

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shi JJ, Halpin DW (2003) Enterprise resource planning for construction business management. J Constr Eng Manag 129(2):214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed SM, Ahmad I, Azhar S, Mallikarjuna S (2003) Implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in the construction industry. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, Construction Research Congress, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oh M, Lee J, Hong SW, Jeong Y (2015) Integrated system for BIM-based collaborative design. Autom Constr 58:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. AIA (2007) Integrated project delivery: a guide California Council National. The American Institute of Architects

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shen W, Hao Q, Mak H, Neelamkavil J, **e H, Dickinson J, Thomas R, Pardasani A, Xue H (2010) Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities management: a review. Adv Eng Inf 24(2):196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Young WN, Jones SA, Bernstein HM (2007) SmartMarket report on building information modeling: transforming design and construction to achieve greater industry productivity. McGraw-Hill Construction

    Google Scholar 

  26. Howard R, Björk B-C (2008) Building information modelling—experts’ views on standardisation and industry deployment. Adv Eng Inf 22(2):271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun M, Sexton M, Senaratne S, Chung P, El-Hamalawi A, Motawa DI, Lin Yeoh M, Plc B, Atkins W (2004) Managing changes in construction projects

    Google Scholar 

  28. Anumba C, Dubler C, Goodman S, Kasprzak C, Kreider R, Messner J, Saluja C, Zikic N (2010) BIM project execution planning guide—version 2.0. Computer Integrated Construction Research Program, The Computer Integrated Construction Research Group, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  29. CURT (2004) Collaboration, integrated information and the project lifecycle in building design. Constr Oper WP-1202

    Google Scholar 

  30. Delavar M (2017) BIM assisted design process automation for pre-engineered buildings (PEB). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, The University of Western Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khan MA (2021) Towards key research gaps in design recommendations on flexurally plated RC beams susceptible to premature failures. J Bridge Eng

    Google Scholar 

  32. Khan MA (2022) Bond parameters for peeling and debonding in thin plated RC beams subjected to mixed mode loading–Framework. Adv Struct Eng 25(3): 662–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332211065184

  33. Khan MA (2021). Towards progressive debonding in composite RC beams subjected to thermo-mechanical bending with boundary constraints–a new analytical solution. Compos Struct 274114334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of the software work was analyzed by Mr. S. Zameer under the guidance of the author of this paper M. Arsalan Khan [PhD, MSc Engg, ACI (Faculty member, USA), IStructE (Graduate, UK), MIES (Chartered with Institution of Engineers Singapore), IACM (Spain), IET (UK)]. The author is extremely thankful for the invaluable support from his late mother.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Arsalan Khan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khan, M. (2023). Integrating BIM with ERP Systems Towards an Integrated Multi-user Interactive Database: Reverse-BIM Approach. In: Ranadive, M.S., Das, B.B., Mehta, Y.A., Gupta, R. (eds) Recent Trends in Construction Technology and Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 260. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2145-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2145-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2144-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2145-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation