The Effect on Mechanical and Microstructure Properties by Varying GGBS Content and NaOH Solution Concentration in Alkaline Solution of Fly-Ash-Based Self-compacting Geopolymer Concrete

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Civil Engineering (CTCS 2021)

Abstract

In this research, mechanical and microstructural properties of Fly-ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete (SCGC) were investigated for shear strength and impact strength by substituting Fly Ash with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) by 0, 30, 50 and 70% and by using alkali solutions such as sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate in the ratio 1:2.5 for different NaOH solution molarities like 8, 10 and 12 M. An iterative procedure was utilized to arrive at the SCGC design mix by completing workability tests like slump flow in compliance with European Federation of National Associations Representing for Concrete (EFNARC) criteria. After obtaining the requisite flow, the concrete was poured into the moulds and cured for 24 h at 70 °C in the oven, with ambient treatment occurring for the remainder of the test days. A constant binding content of 400 kg/m3 and a fluid to binder ratio of 0.47 by mass have been maintained for all molarities, while the superplasticizer dosage of 3% has remained constant. And by compromising on strength, the extra water content was adjusted to provide the desired flow. With increasing molarity and GGBS, the slump flow was reduced. As GGBS content and molarity increased, engineering properties such as shear and impact strength increased, and this was justified with microstructure analysis. As compared to the other replacement level, the replacement of 70% of the Fly Ash with GGBS at 12 M showed higher structural strength. Hence, fly ash and GGBS in a ratio of 50:50 could be a better CO2-reducing alternative to traditional OPC concrete in connection to cost and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCaffrey R (2002) Climate change and cement industry. Global Cement and Lime Magazine, environmental special issue, 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Flower DJM, Sanjayan JG (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions due to concrete manufacture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehta PK (2001) Reducing the environmental impact of concrete. Concr Int 23:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry M, Cross D, Stephens J (2009) Changing the environment: an alternative “Green” concrete produced without Portland cement. In: World of coal ash (WOCA) conference, Lexington, KY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ritchie H, Roser M (2020, May 11) Greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 June 2021

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roy DM (1999) Alkali-activated cements opportunities and challenges. Cem Concr Res 29:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Topark-Ngarm P, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P (2012) Effects of admixtures on high calcium geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. In: The 4th KKU international engineering conference

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development and properties of low-calcium fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research report GC1. Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wallah SE, Rangan BV (2006) Low-calcium fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete: long-term properties. Research report GC2. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rangan BV (2008) Fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research report GC4, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  11. IS: 12089-1987 (1987) Specification of granulated slag for the manufacture of Portland slag cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bairagi NK, Modhera CD (2001) Shear strength of fiber-reinforced concrete. ICI J 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baruah P, Talukdar S (2007) A comparative study of compressive, flexural, tensile and shear strength of concrete with fibres of different origins. Indian Concr J 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  14. IS 456: 2000 (2000) Plain and reinforced concrete-code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, India

    Google Scholar 

  15. ACI Committee 544 (1996) State of the art report on fibre reinforced concrete. ACI Committee 544 report 544. 1R-96. American Concrete Institute, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  16. Song S, Sohn D, Jennings HM, Mason TO (2000) Hydration of alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag. J Mater Sci 35:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. R. Arun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arun, B.R., Vedamurthy, N.H., Nagaraja, P.S., Mahalingasharma, S.J. (2023). The Effect on Mechanical and Microstructure Properties by Varying GGBS Content and NaOH Solution Concentration in Alkaline Solution of Fly-Ash-Based Self-compacting Geopolymer Concrete. In: Nandagiri, L., Narasimhan, M.C., Marathe, S. (eds) Recent Advances in Civil Engineering. CTCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 256. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1862-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1862-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1861-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1862-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation