Political Apathy, Soft Authoritarianism, and Singapore’s Perspectives on the South China Sea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Populism, Nationalism and South China Sea Dispute

Part of the book series: Contributions to International Relations ((CIR))

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines Singapore’s perspectives on the South China Sea as a non-claimant country. It focuses on why Singapore has not changed its long-standing perspectives, despite the rise of global populism and pressure from major power competition between China and the USA between 2016 and 2019. By examining the structure of Singapore’s domestic political economy, the chapter makes three arguments: (1) Singapore’s perspectives on the South China Sea are driven by its national interests set by the state, which has firm control over foreign policy; (2) there is bipartisan support for the state’s foreign policy. Singaporeans will generally support the country’s foreign policy but pay little attention to it because of their disinterest in politics and lack of knowledge of international affairs; (3) Singapore has not been affected by the wave of populist movements because of the resilience of Singapore state. It concludes that Singapore’s perspectives on the South China Sea will remain consistent for the foreseeable future as there is no serious impetus for a shift or major change in Singapore’s fundamental foreign policy principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kuik, C. C. (2021). Getting hedging right: a small-state perspective. China International Strategy Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5.

  2. 2.

    Meick, E.&Salidjanova, N. (2017, July). China’s response to U.S.-South Korean missile defense system deployment and its implications. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. https://www.uscc.gov/research/chinas-response-us-south-korean-missile-defense-system-deployment-and-its-implications.

  3. 3.

    The US Navy FONOPs in the South China Sea started in 2013 under the Obama administration. Between 2013–2016, Washington authorised a total of six FONOPS-half of which were deployed in 2016 alone. See Colin, S. (2016). China, the US, and the law of the sea. China Perspectives (2), pp. 57–62. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6994.

  4. 4.

    Lye, L. F. (2016, December 8). Singapore-China relations hit another snag. Policy Forum. https://www.policyforum.net/singapore-china-relations-hit-another-snag/; Tai, M. (2016, December 15). Singapore’s China conundrum. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/12/singapores-china-conundrum/; Chong, J. I. (2017, April 26). Diverging paths? Singapore-China relations and the East Asian maritime domain. The National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR). https://www.nbr.org/publication/diverging-paths-singapore-china-relations-and-the-east-asian-maritime-domain/.

  5. 5.

    Ng, E. (2016, April 28). China’s actions lent themselves to misunderstanding: Bilahari. TODAY. https://www.todayonline.com/world/chinas-actions-lent-themselves-misunderstanding-bilahari.

  6. 6.

    Today. (2016, November 26). Seizure of SAF armoured vehicles in HK began with Chinese law enforcement tip off: Factwire. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/seizure-saf-armoured-vehicles-hk-began-chinese-law-enforcement-tip-factwire.

  7. 7.

    The White House. (2016, August 2). Remarks by President Obama and Prime Minister Lee of Singapore in joint press conference [Press release]. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/08/02/remarks-president-obama-and-prime-minister-lee-singapore-joint-press.

  8. 8.

    Sim, D. (2020, August 5). Indonesia, Singapore steer clear of US-China dispute in Pompeo’s South China Sea outreach. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3096033/indonesia-singapore-stay-neutral-us-china-dispute-despite.

  9. 9.

    Harris rebukes China in major speech on Indo-Pacific relations. Politico. (2021, August 24). https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/24/kamala-harris-china-singapore-pacific-506675.

  10. 10.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs Singapore. (2021, August 23). Official Visit of Vice President of the United States of America Kamala D. Harris, 22 to 24 August 2021 [Press release]. https://www.mfa.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Statements-Transcripts-and-Photos/2021/08/20210823-US-VP-Visit-Post-JPC.

  11. 11.

    The Hansard refers to the official published report of debates in the parliament of a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, including Singapore.

  12. 12.

    Lee was the father of Singapore’s third (and current) prime minister, Lee Hsien Loong.

  13. 13.

    Au Yong, J. (2016, August 4). Official visit a sign of US emphasis on Asia, not just Singapore: PM Lee Hsien Loong. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/official-visit-a-sign-of-us-emphasis-on-asia-not-just-singapore-pm-lee-hsien-loong.

  14. 14.

    US P-8 spy plane deployed to Singapore. BBC News. (2015, December 8). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35036220.

  15. 15.

    Yang, K. & Ortmann, S. (2020). The origins of the “Singapore fever” in China: 1978–92. In S. Ortmann & M. R. Thompson (eds.), China’s ‘Singapore model’ and authoritarian learning (London: Routledge), pp. 21–37.

  16. 16.

    Torode, G. (2017, August 9). China leaning on Singapore to keep ASEAN calm over South China Sea: sources. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-asean-china-singapore-analysis-idUSKBN1AO17D.

  17. 17.

    World Integrated Trade Solutions. (n.d.). Singapore Trade Indicators 2019. World Bank. https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/SGP/Year/LTST/.

  18. 18.

    Schrag, J. (2017, August 2). How much trade transits the South China Sea? China Power Project of CSIS. https://chinapower.csis.org/much-trade-transits-south-china-sea/.

  19. 19.

    Enterprise Singapore. (2018, December 18). Sea transport industry profile. https://www.enterprisesg.gov.sg/industries/type/sea-transport/industry-profile.

  20. 20.

    Ministry of Law Singapore. (2018, February 8). Speech by Ms Indranee Rajah, Senior Minister of State for Law and Finance, at the ‘International Law Year in Review’ Conference [Press release]. https://www.mlaw.gov.sg/news/speeches/speech-by-sms-indranee-rajah-at-international-law-year-in-review.

  21. 21.

    Law of the Sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore. CNA. (2020, June 11). https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/law-sea-disputes-can-now-be-heard-singapore-723801.

  22. 22.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore. (2016, July 12). MFA Spokesmans Comments on the ruling of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Philippines v China case under [Press release]. https://www.mfa.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Statements-Transcripts-and-Photos/2016/07/MFA-Spokesmans-Comments-on-the-ruling-of-the-Arbitral-Tribunal-in-the-Philippines-v-China-case-under.

  23. 23.

    Parliament of Singapore. (2017). List of MPs By Parliament. https://www.parliament.gov.sg/history/list-of-mps-by-parliament.

  24. 24.

    The Group Representation Constituency (GRC) is a multi-member (up to a maximum of five members) electoral constituency that is unique to the Singapore political system. Each GRC must consist of a candidate or MP from a minority race to ensure fair representation.

  25. 25.

    Full text of workers’ party chief Pritam Singh’s maiden speech as leader of the opposition. Mothership. (2020, September 1). https://mothership.sg/2020/09/pritam-singh-leader-opposition-full-speech/.

  26. 26.

    Chan, I. (2019). Reversing China’s Belt-and-Road Initiative-Singapore’s response to the BRI and its quest for relevance. East Asia. 36(3), pp. 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-019-09317-7.

  27. 27.

    Chalmers, I. (1992). Loosening state control in Singapore: the emergence of local capital as a political force. Asian Journal of Social Science. 20(1), pp. 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/080382492x00130.

  28. 28.

    Asher, M. G. (1994). Some aspects of role of state in Singapore. Economic and Political Weekly. 29(14), pp. 795–804.

  29. 29.

    Leifer, M. (2000). Singapore’s foreign policy: co** with vulnerability. (London: Routledge); Wong, B. & Huang, X. (2010). Political legitimacy in Singapore. Politics & Policy. 38(3), pp. 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00248.x; Tan, K. P. (2011). The people’s action party and political liberalization in Singapore. In L. F. Lye & W. Hofmeister (eds). Political parties, party systems and democratization in East Asia (Singapore: World Scientific), pp. 107–131); Morgenbesser, L. (2016). The autocratic mandate: elections, legitimacy and regime stability in Singapore. The Pacific Review. 30(2), pp. 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1201134; Meredith L. Weiss. (2020). The roots of resilience: party machines and grassroots politics in Singapore and Malaysia. (New York: Cornell University Press), p. 155.

  30. 30.

    Tan, K. P. & Wong, B. (2016). East Asian perspectives on political legitimacy In J. Chan, D. C. Shin, M. S. Williams & T. Sin. (eds). East Asian perspectives on political legitimacy: bridging the empirical-normative divide. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  31. 31.

    Yeo, L. H. (2002). Electoral politics in Singapore. In A. Croissant (ed). Electoral politics in Southeast and East Asia (Berlin&Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Siftung), pp. 203–232. http://library.fes.de/fulltext/iez/01361inf.htm; Tey, T. H. (2008). Singapore’s electoral system: government by the people?. Legal Studies. 28(4), pp. 610–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.2008.00106.x.

  32. 32.

    Tan, N. & Grofman, B. (2018). Electoral rules and manufacturing legislative super-majority: evidence from Singapore. Commonwealth&Comparative Politics. 56(3), pp. 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2018.1468238.

  33. 33.

    Yeo, L. H. (2002). Electoral politics in Singapore. In A. Croissant (ed). Electoral politics in Southeast and East Asia (Berlin&Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Siftung), pp. 203–232. http://library.fes.de/fulltext/iez/01361inf.htm.

  34. 34.

    Goh served as Singapore’s second Prime Minister from 1990–2004. He was succeeded by Lee. See Tan, S. (2020, November 2). Lunch With Sumiko: what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, says MP Tin Pei Ling. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/lunchwithsumiko-what-doesnt-kill-you-makes-you-stronger.

  35. 35.

    Lee, T. (2005). Gestural politics: civil society in “New” Singapore. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. 20(2), pp. 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj20-2b; Rodan, G. (2009). New modes of political participation and Singapore’s nominated members of parliament. Government and Opposition. 44(4), pp. 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01297.x.

  36. 36.

    In the FPTP electoral system, the candidate (or candidates, in the case of a GRC) with the greatest number of votes will become the elected MP(s). Therefore, the PAP wins a disproportionately large number of seats in parliament every election because they win the most number of GRCs.

  37. 37.

    Morgenbesser, L. (2016). The autocratic mandate: elections, legitimacy and regime stability in Singapore. The Pacific Review. 30(2), pp. 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1201134; Oliver, S. & Ostwald, K. (2018). Explaining elections in Singapore: dominant party resilience and valence politics. Journal of East Asian Studies. 18(2), pp. 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2018.15.

  38. 38.

    Yeo, L. H. (2002). Electoral politics in Singapore. In A. Croissant (ed). Electoral politics in Southeast and East Asia (Berlin&Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Siftung), pp. 203–232. http://library.fes.de/fulltext/iez/01361inf.htm.

  39. 39.

    Chan, I. (2021). Singapore’s forward engagement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative: co** with asymmetry, consolidating authority. Asian Perspective. 45(4), pp. 709–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0039.

  40. 40.

    Barr, M. D. (2014). The ruling elite of Singapore: networks of power and influence. (London: I. B. Tauris).

  41. 41.

    Kurlantzick, J. (2000). Love my nanny: Singapore’s tongue-tied populace. World Policy Journal. 17(4), pp. 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-2001-1011; Mauzy, D. K. & Milne, R. S. (2002). Singapore politics under the People’s Action Party (UK: Routledge), p. 35; Grant, J. (2015, March 22). Lee Kuan Yew: Patriarch’s paternalism symbolised by gum ban. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/e42ff1f6-ce03-11e4-9712-00144feab7de.

  42. 42.

    Mediacorp Pte Ltd. (1986, August 17). 1986 National Day Rally (2) [Video]. National Archives of Singapore. https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/audiovisual_records/record-details/48aabfb1-1164-11e3-83d5-0050568939ad.

  43. 43.

    Chong, T. (2009). Singapore in 2008: negotiating domestic issues, confrontations and global challenges. Southeast Asian Affairs.(1), pp. 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1355/seaa09o; Mathew, M., Teo, K. K., Tay, M. & Wang, A. (2021, February). Our Singaporean values: key findings from the world values survey (16). Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/ips-exchange-series-16.pdf.

  44. 44.

    Meredith L. Weiss. (2020). The roots of resilience: party machines and grassroots politics in Singapore and Malaysia. (New York: Cornell University Press), p. 162.

  45. 45.

    Mathew, M., Teo, K. K., Tay, M. & Wang, A. (2021, March). Attitudes towards institutions, politics, and policies: key findings from the world values survey (17). Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/ips-exchange-series-17.pdf.

  46. 46.

    Teo, K. K. (2021, April 8). Are Singaporeans really politically apathetic?. Institute of Policy Studies. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/ips/publications/details/are-singaporeans-really-politically-apathetic.

  47. 47.

    Mathew, M., Teo, K. K., Tay, M. & Wang, A. (2021, February). Our Singaporean values: key findings from the world values survey (16). Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/ips-exchange-series-16.pdf.

  48. 48.

    In the three general elections between 1972 and 1980, the PAP won an average of more than 70% of popular votes, with the highest being the 77.66% vote share in the 1980 general elections. But since the re-entry of opposition MPs beginning in 1984, PAP’s vote share fell to an average of 63.5% between 1984 and 1997. It rose to a high of 75.3% in the 2001 general elections before dip** back into the 60th percentile in the years afterwards.

  49. 49.

    Teo, K. K. (2021, April 8). Are Singaporeans really politically apathetic? Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/ips/publications/details/are-singaporeans-really-politically-apathetic.

  50. 50.

    Ibid.

  51. 51.

    Remarks by professor S. Jayakumar, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, at the RSIS distinguished book launch of “Singapore is not an island: views on Singapore foreign policy”. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. (2017, June 21). https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-speeches-article/rsis/remarks-by-professor-s-jayakumar-faculty-of-law-national-university-of-singapore-at-the-rsis-distinguished-book-launch-of-singapore-is-not-an-island-views-on-singapore-foreign-policy/#.XNKu944zY2w.

  52. 52.

    Thompson, E. C. (2006). Singaporean exceptionalism and its implications for ASEAN regionalism. Contemporary Southeast Asia. 28(2), pp. 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs28-2a.

  53. 53.

    Chong, T. (2014). Johor survey: attitudes towards governance and economy, Iskandar Malaysia, and Singapore. Trends in Southeast Asia (8); ASEAN is divided because of Cambodia? Says who?. Khmer Times. (2022, February 11). https://www.khmertimeskh.com/501004557/asean-is-divided-because-of-cambodia-says-who/.

  54. 54.

    Lai, L. (2019, March 4). Parliament: Singapore should step up its engagement with Asean neighbours, says Low Thia Khiang. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/spore-should-step-up-its-engagement-with-asean-neighbours-low.

  55. 55.

    Based on the author’s search using the Nexis Uni database-a web-based research service. See https://advance.lexis.com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/api/permalink/760c0b22-5938-4683-9d5e-cf92a66e9ab5/?context=1516831; https://advance.lexis.com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/api/permalink/22f0f29a-0186-448f-a5e0-25f403fcdf67/?context=1516831.

  56. 56.

    Ibid.

  57. 57.

    Loh, M. (2017, July 4). In defence of Singapore’s chief naysayer Kishore Mahbubani. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/in-defence-of-singapores-chief-naysayer-kishore-mahbubani; Mohamad Salleh, N. A. & Chew, H. M. (2017, July 3). Minister Shanmugam, diplomats Bilahari and Ong Keng Yong say Prof Mahbubani’s view on Singapore’s foreign policy ‘flawed’. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/prof-kishore-mahbubanis-view-on-singapores-foreign-policy-deeply-flawed-ambassador-at; Teo, J. J. (2017, July 3). S’pore can’t waver on need for rules-based order. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-in-print/spore-cant-waver-on-need-for-rules-based-order.

  58. 58.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs Singapore. (2017, July 17). Transcript of remarks by Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan at the MFA Townhall on [Press release]. https://www.mfa.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Statements-Transcripts-and-Photos/2017/07/Transcript-of-Remarks-by-Minister-for-Foreign-Affairs-Dr-Vivian-Balakrishnan-at-the-MFA-Townhall-on.

  59. 59.

    National Archives of Singapore. (2018, August 7). National day rally speeches. archives online. https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/NationalDayRally/.

  60. 60.

    Lee, H. L. (2016, August 21). National day rally 2016 [Press release]. https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/national-day-rally-2016.

  61. 61.

    Soon, C. & Sim, J. L. (2021, May). Citizen engagement in Singapore: applications of the citizens’ panel. Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/ips-report-on-citizen-engagement-in-singapore-applications-of-the-citizens-panel.pdf.

  62. 62.

    Tan, E. K. B. (2012). Transitioning to a “new normal” in a post-Lee Kuan Yew era. Southeast Asian Affairs (12), pp. 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1355/aa12-1q.

  63. 63.

    Tay, K. (2015, August 3). Whither the hot-button issues of the previous general election? The Business Times. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-general-election/whither-the-hot-button-issues-of-the-previous-general.

  64. 64.

    Gopalakrishnan, R. & Lim, K. (2011, May 4). Singapore PM makes rare apology as election campaign heats up. U.S. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-56766220110504.

  65. 65.

    Tay, K. (2015, August 3). Whither the hot-button issues of the previous general election?. The Business Times. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-general-election/whither-the-hot-button-issues-of-the-previous-general.

  66. 66.

    Other reasons for PAP’s strong performance in the 2015 general elections include the jubilee celebration of Singapore’s fiftieth year of independence, and Lee Kuan Yew’s passing in March 2015.

  67. 67.

    Mathew, M., Teo, K. K., Tay, M. & Wang, A. (2021, March). Attitudes towards institutions, politics, and policies: key findings from the world values survey (17). Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/ips-exchange-series-17.pdf.

  68. 68.

    Mathew, M., Teo, K. K., Tay, M., & Wang, A. (2021, February). Our Singaporean values: key findings from the world values survey (16). Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/ips-exchange-series-16.pdf.

  69. 69.

    Chan, I. (2021). Singapore’s forward engagement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative: co** with asymmetry, consolidating authority. Asian Perspective. 45(4), pp. 709–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0039.

  70. 70.

    Li, X. R. (2017, December 15). China-Singapore relations in 2017: better than ‘normal.’. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2017/12/china-singapore-relations-in-2017-better-than-normal/.

  71. 71.

    Oliver, S. & Ostwald, K. (2018). Explaining elections in Singapore: dominant party resilience and valence politics. Journal of East Asian Studies. 18(2), pp. 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2018.15; Koay, A. [MothershipSG]. (2020, January 19). Singaporean sociologist Chua Beng Huat explains why 70% voted for this [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jDX3Zbc6cs&feature=youtu.be.

  72. 72.

    Careers@Gov. (2021). The public service. https://www.careers.gov.sg/who-we-are/the-public-.

  73. 73.

    Teo, Y. Y. (2018). This is what inequality looks like: essays by Teo You Yenn. (Singapore; Ethos Books), pp. 26–33.

  74. 74.

    Baker, J. A. (2019, July 18). Meritocracy not to blame; Indranee spells out 4G team’s approach to tackle inequality. CNA. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/singapore-social-service-inequality-indranee-rajah-nus-872566; Heng, M. (2019, October 22). Meritocracy still key principle for recognising individuals in Singapore, says Ong Ye Kung. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/meritocracy-still-key-principle-for-recognising-individuals-in-singapore-says-ong-ye-kung.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Chan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chan, I. (2022). Political Apathy, Soft Authoritarianism, and Singapore’s Perspectives on the South China Sea. In: Peng, N., Ngeow, CB. (eds) Populism, Nationalism and South China Sea Dispute. Contributions to International Relations. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1453-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation