Blended Analysis of Occupational Safety Hazards and Risk Assessment Approach in the Construction Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 251))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 788 Accesses

Abstract

Occupational safety hazards and risk management in construction industry are major worldwide concerns due to its unique dynamic nature of the working environment. Industry injury reports contain valuable information to support the risk control and prevention programs. Systematic analysis of the risk factors on cause-and effect relationship and safety attributes of the incident injury reports can make significant contributions to the construction industry and is an ideal approach for the occupational performance and risk evaluation. A blended analysis of the occupational injuries is proposed by using an attribute-based risk assessment model together with degree of risk assessment to determine the level of injury and magnitude of safety. To enhance the current quantification method, this study quantified risk attributes associated with frequency of exposure, incident probability and potential consequence. Incident injury cases are first collected from a large number of construction-related injury reports and then classified according to the pre-assigned categorized risk factors and a list of relative safety attributes based on the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) procedures and other safety standards. The availability, quality and reliability of the data will also be assessed. Data mining-based analysis is then conducted following the attribute-based risk assessment to further reveal the associations, visualization, and correlation coefficient of risky activities and constructional hazards. The blended analysis is expected to help the construction industry identify relationships on causes of safety hazards, key safety attributes and ergonomic characteristics, as well as the level of injury and their corresponding risk controls and preventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aksorn T, Hadikusumo BHW (2008) Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects. Saf Sci 46:709–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baradan S, Usmen MA (2006) Comparative injury and fatality risk analysis of building trades. J Constr Eng Manage 132(5):533–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciarapica FE (2009) Classification and prediction of occupational injury risk using soft computing techniques: an Italian study. Saf Sci 47(1):36–49, 38:4, 308–321

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esmaeili B, Hallowell M (2012) Attribute-based risk model for measuring safety risk of struck-by accidents. In: Construction research congress 2012 construction challenges in a flat world, ASCE, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 2012, pp 289–298

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fayyad UM (1996) Data mining and knowledge discovery: making sense out of data. IEEE Expert 11(5):20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Government of Canada, Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, OHS (2011) Hazard and risk: OHS answers-risk assessment. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hallowell MR, Bhandari S, Alruqi W (2020) Methods of safety prediction: analysis and integration of risk assessment, leading indicators, precursor analysis, and safety climate. Constr Manag Econ 38(4):308–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA (2007) A formal model of construction safety risk management. In: 2007 Construction and building research conference, COBRA, sponsored by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, 6–7 Sept 2007

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haslam RA, Hide SA, Gibb AGF, Gyi DE, Pavitt T, Atkinson S, Duff AR (2005) Contributing factors in construction accidents. Appl Ergon 36:401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kartam NA, Flood I, Koushki P (2000) Construction safety in Kuwait: issues, procedures, problems, and recommendations. Saf Sci 36:163–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liao CW, Perng YH (2008) Data mining for occupational injuries in the Taiwan construction industry. Saf Sci 46:1091–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Office of the Director n.d., NIOSH et al. (2007) Elements of ergonomic programs: use checklists. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prades M (2014) Attribute-based risk model for assessing risk to industrial construction tasks. Master’s thesis. University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tam CM, Zeng SX, Deng ZM (2004) Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China. Saf Sci 42:569–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson B (1996) Investigation of equipment related injuries, and fatalities in construction. MS thesis, University of Washington

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tixier A, Hallowell M, Rajagopalan B, Bowman D (2016) Automated content analysis for construction safety: a natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports. Autom Constr 62:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  17. Winkel G, Cocchio J, Wilson L, McCutcheon D (2003, nd) A handbook for engineering safety and risk management, leadership in risk management. The University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **nming Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qiu, C., Li, X. (2023). Blended Analysis of Occupational Safety Hazards and Risk Assessment Approach in the Construction Industry. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 251. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1029-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1029-6_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1028-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1029-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation