EM-based Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technical Advances in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
  • 792 Accesses

Abstract

The TESSYS technique (transforaminal endoscopic spine system) is gradually becoming a new gold standard surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), which can remove part of the articular process by special reamers, thus providing more space for operation and expanding the scope of application of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Puncture location and foraminoplasty are the key steps of TESSYS technique, which directly determine the position of the working channel and the operability of subsequent exploration and decompression. In order to establish a good working channel and improve the accuracy of surgery, aiming devices or computer navigation technology are introduced for spinal surgery. Electromagnetic navigation is helpful for making the preoperative plan, selecting the best surgical approach, and designing the surgical incision for lumbar foraminoplasty. With real-time navigation assistance, surgeons can accurately locate and reach the lesion through the best path, which can avoid the loss of direction, minimize the iatrogenic trauma, and reduce the difficulty and risk of operation. At present, the results of EM-based navigation-guided lumbar foraminoplasty are still preliminary, albeit encouraging. We believe that the combined use of the electromagnetic navigation and endoscopic surgery will further develop the accuracy, safety, and efficiency of lumbar foraminoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computerized tomography

EM:

Electromagnetic

LDH:

Lumbar disc herniation

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SAP:

Superior articular process

SEESSYS:

I-See (Full Visualization Endoscopic System) Electromagnetic navigation Endoscopic Spinal Surgery System

TESSYS:

Transforaminal endoscopic surgical system

VAS:

Visual analog scale

YESS:

Yeung Endoscopic Spine System

References

  1. Kambin P, Sampson S. Posterolateral percutaneous suction-excision of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs. Report of interim results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;207:37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeung AT. Minimally invasive disc surgery with the Yeung Endoscopic Spine System (YESS). Surg Technol Int. 1999;8:267–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, et al. Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(24):E890–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li X, Hu Z, Cui J, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Int J Surg. 2016;27:8–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou C, Zhang G, Panchal RR, et al. Unique complications of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Pain Physician. 2018;21:E105–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Narain AS, Hijji FY, Yom KH, et al. Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: perspectives and future directions in spine surgery. World J Orthop. 2017;8:524–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. von Jako RA, Carrino JA, Yonemura KS, et al. Electromagnetic navigation for percutaneous guide-wire insertion: accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional fluoroscopic guidance. Neuroimage. 2009;47:T127–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sagi HC, Manos R, Benz R, et al. Electromagnetic field-based image-guided spine surgery part one: results of a cadaveric study evaluating lumbar pedicle screw placement. Spine. 2003;28:2013–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. HT T, SB H, ZL X, et al. Application of navigation rod for puncture and positioning in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord. 2017;27(04):339–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu HY, Ye B, Duan W, et al. Preoperative three-dimensional image measurement combined with laser navigator assisted puncture for percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy. J Spinal Surg. 2019;017(001):11–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fu Q, Liu YB, Li J, et al. Ultrasound volume navigation technology in transforaminal puncture of minimally invasive lumbar surgery with full-endoscopic techniques. Chin J Orthop. 2016;36(001):1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shurkhay VA, Goryaynov SA, Kutin MA, et al. Application of intraoperative electromagnetic frameless navigation in transcranial and endoscopic neurosurgical interventions. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2017;81(5):5–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takenaka T, Toyota S, Kuroda H, et al. Freehand technique of an electromagnetic navigation system emitter to avoid interference caused by metal neurosurgical instruments. World Neurosurg. 2018;118:143–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsang RK, Chung JCK. Adapting electromagnetic navigation system for transoral robotic-assisted skull base surgery. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(8):1922–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soteriou E, Grauvogel J, Laszig R, et al. Prospects and limitations of different registration modalities in electromagnetic ENT navigation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(11):3979–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berger M, Kallus S, Nova I, et al. Approach to intraoperative electromagnetic navigation in orthognathic surgery: a phantom skull based trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(9):1731–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouchard C, Magill JC, Nikonovskiy V, et al. Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(2):265–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohya T, Iwai T, Luan K, Kato T, et al. Analysis of carotid artery deformation in different head and neck positions for maxillofacial catheter navigation in advanced oral cancer treatment. Biomed Eng Online. 2012;4(11):65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kochanski RB, Lombardi JM, Laratta JL, et al. Image-guided navigation and robotics in spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(6):1179–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klingler JH, Sircar R, Scheiwe C, et al. Comparative study of C-arms for intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging and navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery Part I: applicability and image quality. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(6):276–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ankur S, Narain, Fady Y, et al. Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: perspectives and future directions in spine surgery. World J Orthop. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shin S, Kim Y, Kwak H, et al. 3D tracking of surgical instruments using a single camera for laparoscopic surgery simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:581–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaeger HA, Nardelli P, O’Shea C, et al. Automated catheter navigation with electromagnetic image guidance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(8):1972–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zamorano L, Jiang Z, Kadi AM. Computer-assisted neurosurgery system: Wayne State University hardware and software configuration. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994;18(4):257–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gauvin G, Yeo CT, Ungi T, et al. Real-time electromagnetic navigation for breast-conserving surgery using NaviKnife technology: a matched case-control study. Breast J. 2020;26(3):399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pishnamaz M, Wilkmann C, Na HS, et al. Electromagnetic real time navigation in the region of the posterior pelvic ring: an experimental in-vitro feasibility study and comparison of image guided techniques. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sorriento A, Porfido MB, Mazzoleni S, et al. Optical and electromagnetic tracking systems for biomedical applications: a critical review on potentialities and limitations. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng PP. 2019;99:1–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, YJ., Lin, YP., Rao, SY. (2022). EM-based Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty. In: Kim, JS., Härtl, R., Wang, M.Y., Elmi-Terander, A. (eds) Technical Advances in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0175-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0175-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0174-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0175-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation