Introduction and Selected Case Studies in Hydroelasticity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Aeroelasticity
  • 443 Accesses

Abstract

As a generic definition, hydroelasticity can further be defined as a branch of science concerned with the motion and distortion of deformable bodies responding to environmental excitations in the sea, as it evolves and is modified from the original Collar triangle. The discipline is concerned with phenomena involving interaction between inertial, hydrodynamic, i.e. the fluid pressure acting on the structure, and elastic forces on the structure which modifies its dynamic state and, in return, the motion and distortion of the structure. Considerations on hydroelasticity relevant to offshore oil production platforms, low-speed conventional ships and high-speed monohull or multihull vessels, which are affected by several types of dynamic loads including environmental actions, such as wind and waves, will be discussed to provide comprehensive understanding of the state of affairs. Then engineering analyses for the prediction of induced dynamic responses of such engineering systems will be elaborated in terms of a formulation of fluid–structure interaction via integration of hydrodynamics, structural mechanics and use of novel modeling techniques. Specific example in this subject is the author and colleague work on numerical boundary element computation of submerged body-surface wave interaction, which will be elaborated in detail. To provide some introductory examples in hydroelasticity, attention is given to the state of affairs and equation of motion of hydrofoils moving in incompressible and inviscid or viscous flow, and discussions on methods of solutions for stability and dynamic response. Inviscid fluid–structure coupling modeling and solution scheme will also be discussed, employing finite element method and representing the hydrofoil by a typical section. Many figures utilized in this chapter have been adopted or adapted from recent publications, for which the author would like to thank the corresponding authors whole-heartedly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such as elaborated in Chap. 24, BEM-FEM Coupling for Acoustic Effects on Aeroelastic Stability of Structures.

  2. 2.

    As also stipulated by Spyros Hirdaris in [1] as a generic definition, hydroelasticity is the branch of science concerned with the interactions of deformable bodies with the water environment in which they operate. Hydroelasticity as the naval counterpart to aeroelasticity recognizes that at fluid–structure interaction level significant differences may exist between the hydrodynamic, inertia, and elastic forces experienced by a floating marine structure. In other words, the fluid pressure acting on the structure modifies its dynamic state and, in return, the motion and distortion of the structure disturb the pressure field around it.

  3. 3.

    Hydrofoil Ship Image courtesy of unsplash.com. https://unsplash.com/photos/vijlBhahDk8.

  4. 4.

    Created and adapted from data and information from other resources, among others Senjanovic et al. [6] (with the authors’ permission) and Malenica and Derbanne [7].

  5. 5.

    Created and adapted from data and information from various resources, among others Senjanovic et al. [3] (with the authors’ permission) and other considerations.

  6. 6.

    Oceangoing LNG Vessel Picture Courtesy of stocksnap; https://stocksnap.io/search/Oceangoing+and+LNG+Vessels; shutterstock.com 1142981348.

  7. 7.

    The figure has been created and adapted using data and information from various online resources, among others Spyros Hirdaris et al. [8] and (a) and (b) from https://stocksnap.io/search/Oceangoing+and+LNG+Vessel/.

  8. 8.

    Oceangoing LNG Vessel Picture Courtesy of stocksnap; https://stocksnap.io/search/Oceangoing+and+LNG+Vessels; shutterstock.com 114298134.

  9. 9.

    Further detail canbe found in Malenica [7].

  10. 10.

    Extracted from various data and information, among others Ni et al. [31].

    Harding et al. [32].

  11. 11.

    Created and adapted using data and information (with great thanks to) Harding and Temarel [2], the online version of this article can be found at http://pim.sagepub.com/content/223/3/305.

  12. 12.

    Created using data and information from various sources, among others (with great thanks to) Harding et al. [32] (with permission).

  13. 13.

    Created and adapted using data and information from various sources, among others (with great thanks to) Hirdaris et al. [33] (with permission). Details are elaborated in this reference.

References

  1. Hirdaris, S., Introduction to Hydroelasticity of Ships, 2004-P8_LRTA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirdaris, S.E., and P. Temarel. 2009. Hydroelasticity of ships: Recent advances and future trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. https://doi.org/10.1243/14750902JEME160

  3. Senjanovic, I., N. Vladimir, and S. Malenica. 2019. An overview of ship hydroelasticity. In 7th International Conference on Marine Structures, 8 May 2019, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, X.J., Y.S. Wu, W.C. Cui, and J.J. Jensen. 2006. Review of hydroelasticity theories for global response of marine structures. Ocean Engineering 33: 439–457.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heller, S.R., and H.N. Abramson. 1959. Hydroelasticity—A new naval science. Journal of the American Society of Naval Engineers 71: 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bishop, R.E.D., W.G. Price, and P.K.Y. Tam. 1977. A unified dynamic analysis of ship response to waves. Transactions of Royal Institution of Naval Architects 119: 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malenica. 2014. Hydro-structural issues in the design of ultra large container ships. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 6: 983–999. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0226

  8. Hirdaris, S.E., W. Bai, D. Dessi, A. Ergin, X. Gu, O.A. Hermundstad, R. Huijsmans, K. Iijima, U.D. Nielsen, J. Parunov, N. Fonseca, A. Papanikolaou, K. Argyriadis, and A. Incecik. 2014. Loads for use in the design of ships and offshore structures. Ocean Engineering 78: 131–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.09.012

  9. Djojodihardjo, H., B.B. Prananta, and S.B. Aman. 1993. Numerical boundary element computation of submerged body-surface wave interaction. In Proceedings of the Third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Singapore, 6–11 June.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van den Berg, W., H.C. Raven, and H.H. Valkhof. 1990. Free surface potential flow calculation for merchant vessels. In CFD and CAD in ship design, ed. G. van Oortmensen. Elsevier Science Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson, C.W. 1977. A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. In Proceedings of the 2nd Seminar on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, UCLA, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Djojodihardjo, R.H., and S.E. Widnall. 1969. A numerical method for the calculation of nonlinear unsteady lifting potential flow problems. AIAA Journal 7: 2001–2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen, G., and H. Soding. 1989. Ship wave resistance computation. In Seminar on Marine Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen, G., Bertram, V., and Soding, H. 1991. Ship wave resistance computation. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Djojodihardjo, H., H. Suhartono, and M. Karnadi. 1986. The use of green identity in panel method for the computation of three dimensional subsonic aerodynamics (in Indonesian). Indonesian Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Djojodihardjo, H. 1991. Computational study of the aerodynamics of passenger vehicle. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive Engineering, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salvesen, N., and V.C. Kerczek. 1976. Comparison of numerical and perturbation solutions of two-dimensional nonlinear water-wave problems. Journal of Ship Research 20: 160–170.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Djojodihardjo, H. 2016. Aeroelastic and performance baseline analysis of piezoaeroelastic wing section for energy harvester. In First IntSymp Flutter and Application, JAXA, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chae, E.J. 2015. Dynamic response and stability of flexible in incompressible viscous flow. Ph.D., University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ducoin, Antoine, and Yin L. Young. 2011. Hydroelastic response and stability of a hydrofoil in viscous flow. In Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’11, Hamburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anonymous. ANSYS Fluent Tutorial Guide (ANSYS, ANSYS Workbench, Ansoft, AUTODYN, EKM, Engineering Knowledge Manager, CFX, FLUENT). http://users.abo.fi/rzevenho/ansys%20fluent%2018%20tutorial%20guide.pdf

  22. Bisplinghoff, R.L., H. Ashley, and R.L. Halfman. 1955. Aeroelasticity. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zwaan, R.J. 1981. Aeroelasticity of Aircraft, Lecture Notes, Special Lecture, Short Course offered at Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia (Author’s reposutory).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wright, J.R., and J.E. Cooper. 2015. Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and loads, 2nd ed. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118700440

  25. Djojodihardjo, H., and H.H. Yee. 2007. Parametric study of the flutter characteristics of transport aircraft wings. In Proceedings of AEROTECH-II, Conference on Aerospace Technology of XXI Century, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Menter, F.R. 1993. Improved two-equation k-turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. NASA Technical Memorandum 103975 34. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Menter, F.R. 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32 (8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149

  28. Ducoin, Antoine, and Yin L. Young. 2013. Hydroelastic response and stability of a hydrofoil in viscous flow. Journal of Fluids and Structures 38: 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Astolfi, J.A., A. Lelong, P. Bot, and J.-B. Marchand. 2015. Experimental analysis of hydroelastic response of flexible hydrofoils. In Conference: 5th High Performance Yacht Design Conference, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pendergraft, Jr., et al. 1992. A user’s guide to the Langley 16-by 24-inch water tunnel. NASA TM 104200.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ni, Zao, M. Dhanak, and T. C. Su. 2021. Performance of a hydrofoil operating close to a free surface over arange of angles of attack. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 13: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Harding, R.D., S.E. Hirdaris, S.H. Miao, M. Pittilo, and P. Temarel. 2006. Use of hydroelasticity analysis in design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology, 1–12, China.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hirdaris, S.E., N. Bakkers, N. White, and P. Temarel. 2009. Service factor assessment of a great lakes bulk carrier incorporating the effects of hydroelasticity. Marine Technology and SNAME News 46 (2): 116–221.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Timoshenko, S.P., and D.H. Young. 1968. Theory of structures, 2nd ed. USA: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Haque, Aamer. 2019. Timoshenko beam theory. Independently Published.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Öchsner, Andreas. 2021. Classical beam theories of structural mechanics. Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-76034-2 (ISBN 978-3-030-76035-9 (eBook). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76035-9. Accessed January 2022.

  37. Anonymous. Lloyd Register, 2018, Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Naval Ships, vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harijono Djojodihardjo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Djojodihardjo, H. (2023). Introduction and Selected Case Studies in Hydroelasticity. In: Introduction to Aeroelasticity . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8078-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8078-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8077-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8078-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation