Abstract
Three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamics and computational approaches for continuation of Chap. 8 in unsteady Aerodynamics are elaborated in the present chapter (Reproduced from and based on several papers: [1,2,3,4]). Further it illustrates some of the contributions in lifting surfaces based on potential aerodynamic approaches and serves to provide and elaborate a good spectrum of problems and analytical approaches focusing on case studies in three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamic theory and computational methods. The first case study illustrates one of the first attempts in unsteady lifting potential flow solution method using geometric discretization and singularity distributions on the aerodynamic surface, which contributes to the present Boundary Element Method. The second case study addresses a more complex situation, that is the unsteady subsonic three-dimensional flow with separation bubble, and utilizes the singularity method. The third case study reflects the application of these previous techniques in addressing aircraft buffeting phenomena, a practical aeroelastic problem, using dynamic response approach The last case study elaborates the application of the three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamics lifting surface method to address combined aeroelasticity and acoustic excitation in a unified boundary element approach. These case studies are presented to provide an illustration of the application of lifting surface or boundary element method to solve unsteady aerodynamic problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the present book q and Q, as well as q and Q, are alternatively used to denote fluid velocity vector, which by context can be distinguished from V as volume. Similarly, the vector cross product is represented by either × or \(\otimes\). Also, alternatively the substantial derivative \(\frac{d}{dt}\) and \(\frac{D}{Dt}\) are alternatively utilized.
- 2.
Or equivalent expression in polar or cylindrical coordinates, ur for the radial component and uθ; for the tangential component of the velocity.
- 3.
One could also write as \({\mathbf{a}} = \frac{{D\,{\mathbf{Q}}}}{Dt}\, = \,\frac{{\partial \,{\mathbf{Q}}}}{\partial t}\, + \,\left( {{\mathbf{Q}} \cdot \nabla } \right){\mathbf{Q}}\, = \,\rho \,{\mathbf{g}}\, - \,\frac{\nabla \,p}{\rho }\). In addition, one could also use V instead of Q. Hence \({\mathbf{a}} = \,\frac{{D\,{\mathbf{V}}}}{Dt}\,\, = \,\,\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{V}}}}{\partial t}\, + \,\left( {{\mathbf{V}} \cdot \nabla } \right)\,\,{\mathbf{V}}\, = \,\,\nabla \left[ {\Omega \,\, - \int {\frac{dp}{\rho }} } \right]\).
- 4.
\(\frac{1}{{\left| {\nabla S} \right|}}\frac{\partial S}{{\partial t}} \equiv \frac{{\partial \left( {\frac{\nabla S}{{\left| {\nabla S} \right|}}} \right)}}{\partial t} \equiv \frac{{\partial {\mathbf{n}}}}{\partial t}\).
- 5.
\(U_{0}\) or \(U_{\infty }\) is chosen here as appropriate for physical plausibility and for convenience.
- 6.
Such approach is reminiscent of presently well-developed partition of unity distribution and shape functions in boundary element and finite element methods.
- 7.
Reproduced qualitatively from Djojodihardjo et al. [1].
- 8.
\(U \cdot Br \equiv\) Upper Boundary.
- 9.
The detail is given in the referenced paper, Djojodihardjo et al. [2].
- 10.
Now PT Dirgantara Indonesia.
- 11.
For acceptance function, one may refer to Chen, XZ, Matsumoto, M, Kareem, A, Time Domain Flutter and Buffeting Response Analysis of Bridges, https://www3.nd.edu/~nathaz/journals/ (2000).
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
Djojodihardjo et al. [3].
- 16.
Not all the appendices and the equations elaborated in the referenced paper are reproduced here. Further details are given in Djojodihardjo, Sekar, Prananta [2].
Other Appendices and related equations can be found in the referred document.
- 17.
The integration \(\mathop {\int_{ - 1}^{1} {} }\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} \text{singular} \\ {\text{integral}} \end{subarray} }\) signifies singular integral that should be dealt with following the established procedure.
Abbreviations
- A; Aij:
-
Area of the surface element; matrix of velocity, influence coefficient
- B i :
-
Total apparent downwash velocity
- C ij :
-
Velocity potential influence coefficient
- CL, \({C_M^{\prime}}\), ci, cm:
-
Lift and moment coefficients; sectional or two-dimensional lift and moment coefficients
- c :
-
Half-chord
- i, j, k :
-
Unit vectors in the x, y and z directions
- Kv, Kv2:
-
Velocity kernel functions
- KVx, KVy, KVxx, KVxy, KVyy:
-
First- and second-order derivatives of Kv
- M x :
-
Area moment about the x axis
- n, ν; n:
-
Unit normal vectors; normal coordinate
- N, NC, NS:
-
Total number of surface elements, number of elements along the chord and number of elements along the semi-span
- Q :
-
Velocity vector at a field point
- R :
-
\(\left| {{\mathbf{x}} - {\mathbf{\xi }}} \right|\) scalar distance between a field and a source point
- S(x,t) :
-
The surface of the wing
- s:
-
Distance travelled by the wing in half-chord; chordwise coordinate along the surface
- t; Δt:
-
Dimensionless time or time; time increment
- U(t)); U0:
-
Freestream velocity; a reference velocity
- W(x,t) :
-
The surface of the wake
- x, ζ; x, y, z:
-
Coordinate vector of a point; its components
- \(\alpha\) :
-
Angle of incidence
- \(\Gamma\) :
-
Vortex strength, circulation
- \(\theta\) :
-
Angle
- \(\sigma ;\sigma_{x} ;\sigma_{xx}\) :
-
Doublet strength; its derivatives
- \(\phi\) :
-
Velocity potential
- o :
-
Centroid of a surface element
- i, j, k :
-
Dummy indices; refer to element i, j, or k
- x, y, z :
-
Refer to the x, y and z directions
- /:
-
Lower surface
- u :
-
Upper surface
- s :
-
Step doublet distribution or the surface of the wing
- w :
-
Surface of the wake
References
Djojodihardjo, R.H., and Sheila E. Widnall. 1969. A numerical method for the calculation of nonlinear unsteady potential flow problems. AIAA Journal 7 (10), October.
Djojodihardjo, H., W.K. Sekar, and B.B. Prananta. 1992. Calculation of 3D unsteady subsonic flow with separation bubble using singularity method. In 18th, ICAS Congress, Bei**g.
Djojodihardjo, M. Akbar, L. Gunawan, and M. Kusni. 2010. Unified aerodynamic-acoustic formulation for aero-acoustic structure coupling. In 27th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences 2010, ICAS 2010, vol. 3, issue: Nice, France.
Haryanto, I., A preliminary study on buffeting problem utilizing dynamic response approach. In ICAS94-10.7.3, and 4.
Greidanus, J.H., A.I. van de Vooren, and H. Bergh. 1952. Experimental determination of the aerodynamic coefficients of an oscillating wing in incompressible two-dimensional flow. Repts, F-101 to F-104, National Luchtvaart Laboratorium.
Ransleben, G.E., and H.N. Abramson. 1962. Experimental determination of oscillatory lift and moment distributions of fully submerged flexible hydrofoils. Rept. 2, Contract Nonr-3335(00), Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas.
Spurck, J. 1963. Messungen der Aerodynamischen Beiwerte Schwingender Flugelprofil in Windkanal und Vergleich met der Theorie. NR. 29, Mitteilungen Max-Planck Institute, Gottingen.
Küssner, H.G. and G. von Gorup. 1960. Instationare Lineasierte Theorie der Flugelprofile endlicher Dicke in Inkompressibler Stromung. NR. 26, Mitteilungen Max-Planck Institute, Gottingen.
Hewson-Browne, R.C. 1963. The oscillation of a thick aerofoil in an incompressible flow. Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 16: 79–92.
van de Vooren, A.I., and H. van de Vel. 1963. Unsteady profile theory in incompressible Flow. Rept. TW-17, Mathematics Institute, Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Giesing, J.P. 1968. Nonlinear two-dimensional unsteady potential flow with lift. Journal of Aircraft 5(2): 135–143.
Chen, C.F., and R.A. Wirtz. 1968. Second-order theory for flow past oscillating foils. AIAA Journal 6(8): 1556–1562.
Ashley, H., S.E. Widnall, and M.T. Landahl. 1965. New directions in lifting surface theory. AIAA Journal 3(1): 3–15.
Landahl, M.T., and V.J.E. Stark. 1968. Numerical lifting surface theory—Problems and progress. In AIAA Paper 68–72.
Miller, R.H. 1964a. Rotor blade harmonic loading. AIAA Journal 2(7): 1254–1269.
Miller, R.H. 1964b. Unsteady air loads on helicopter rotor blades. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 68: 640.
Ashley, H. 1966. Machine Computation of Aerodynamic Loads in Linear and Nonlinear Situations. Rept. 66–5, AFOSR 66–1440, Fluid Dynamics Research Lab., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hess, J.L., and A.M.O. Smith. 1966. Calculation of Potential Flow About Arbitrary Bodies. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, vol. 8. Pergamon.
Rubbert, P.E. et al. 1967. A general method for determining the aerodynamic characteristics of fan-in-wing configuration. TR 67–61A, U. S. Army Aviation Materiel Lab.
Djojodihardjo, R.H. 1969. A Numerical Method for the Calculation of Nonlinear Unsteady Lifting Potential Flow Problems. Sc.D. thesis, Feb. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronauics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hadamard, J. 1952. The Finite Part of an Infinite Simple Integral. Lectures on Cauchy’s Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations, 133–141. Dover.
Mangier, K.W. 1952. Improper integrals in theoretical aerodynamics. C.P. 94, Aeronautical Research Council, Great Britain.
Timoshenko, S., D.H. Young, and W. Weaver. 1974. Vibration Problems in Engineering. New York: Wiley.
Watkins, C.E., H.L. Runyan, and D.S. Woolston. 1995. On the kernel function of the integral equations relating the lift and downwash distributions of oscillating finite wing in subsonic flow, NACA Rep. 1234.
Wagner, H. 1925. Uber die Entstehung des Dynamischen Auftriebes von Traflugeln. Zeitscrift fur Angewandte Maihematik und Mechanik 5(1), Feb.
Chen, X.Z., M. Matsumoto, and A. Kareem. 2000. Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges. https://www3.nd.edu/~nathaz/journals/. Time Domain Flutter and Buffeting Response Analysis of Bridges.
Jones, R.T. 1939. The unsteady lift of a finite wing. TN 682, NACA.
Garrick, I.E. 1957. Nonsteady Wing Characteristics. VII. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bratt, J.B. 1953. Flow patterns in the wake of oscillating airfoil. R & M 2773, Royal Aeronautical Establishment, Great Britain.
Jones, W.P. 1945. Aerodynamic forces on wings in nonuniform motion. R & M 2117, Aeronautical Research Council, Great Britain.
Chi, R.M. 1985. Separated flow unsteady aerodynamic theory. Journal of Aircraft 22 (11)
Ericsson, L.E., and J.P. Reding. 1981. Unsteady airfoil stall, Review and extension. AIAA Journal 8: 609–616.
Perumal, P.V.K., and F. Sisto. 1974. Lift and moment prediction for an oscillating airfoil with moving separation point. ASME Transaction, Journal of Engineering of Power 96: 372–378.
Dowell, E.H. 1977. A simplified theory of oscillating airfoil in transonic flow: Review and extention, AIAA Paper, 77–445, March.
Huber, T., B. Rochholz, and B. Laschka. 1991. Modelling of separated flow around oscillating cascade by classical singularity method. International Forum on Aerolasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, June 3–6.
Djojodihardjo, H., W.K. Sekar, and B. Laschka. 1991. Calculation of pressure distribution on two dimensional wing in unsteady subsonic flow with separation bubble using kernel function method. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, Germany.
Bendat, J.S., and A.G. Piersol. 1971. Random Data: Analysis and Measrument Procedure. Canada: Wiley.
Laschka, B.1963. Zur Theorie der Harmonischschwingenden, Tragenden Flaeche bel Unterschallanstroemung, Zeitschrift fuer Flugwissen schaften, Braunschweig.
Küssner, H.G. 1940. Allgemeine Tragflachentheorie. Luftfahrtforschung 17, 370–378.
Watkins, C.E., D.S. Woolston, and H.J. Cunningham. 1960. A systematic kernel function procedures for determining aerodynamics forces on oscillating or steady finite wing at subsonic speed, NASA TRR-48.
Wrobel, L.C. 2003. The Boundary Element Method, Volume 1, Applications in Thermo-Fluids and Acoustics. Wiley.
Boyden, R.P., and W.G. Johson. 1982. Result of buffet tests in a cryogenic wind tunnel. NASA-TM 84520, September.
Djojodihardjo, H., and W.K. Sekar. 1991. Calculation of unsteady aerodynamics load on a finite span wing with separated region using strip theory approach. IPTN Internal Report.
Akbar, M., L. Gunawan, and M. Kusni. 2010. Calculation of unsteady aerodynamic loads on oscillating lifting surface using doublet point method. Paper 128, Proceedings, Regional Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Technology Bali, February 9–10.
Ashley, H., and M.T. Landahl. 1965. Aerodynamics of Wings and Bodies. Reading, MA: Addison & Wesley.
Djojodihardjo, H., and W.K. Sekar. 1993. Flutter calculation of two and three dimensional subsonic wing with separation bubble as preliminary estimation of buffeting problem. In The International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Strasbourg, France, May 24–26.
Djojodihardjo, H., W.K. Sekar, and E. Suleman. 1993. Flutter and dynamic response calculation of unsteady separated flow using singularity method or preliminary estimation of buffeting problem. In Symposium of The Advances in Aerospace Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA, September 23–24.
Försching, H. 1981. Aeroelastic Buffeting Prediction Techniques—A General Review. DFVLR.
Chyu, W.J., and M.K. Au-Yang. 1972. Random response of rectanguler panels to the pressure field beneath a turbulent boundary layor in subsonic flows. NASA TN D-6970, October.
Ueda, T., and E.H. Dowell. 1982. A new solution method for lifting surfaces in subsonic flow. AIAA Journal 20: 348–355.
Zwaan, R.J. 1981. Aeroelasticity of aircraft. Lecture Notes, Special Lecture, Short Course offered at Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia, Lecture Notes delivered at Special Meeting at ITB in August 1981 (private collection).
Bisplinghoff, R.L., H. Ashley, and Halfman. 1995. Aerolasticity. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Blevins, R.D. 1977. Flow-Induced Vibration. van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Bull, M.K. 1967. Wall-pressure fluctuations associated with subsonic turbulent boundary layer flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 28(4): 719–754.
Djojodihardjo, H., and E. Tendean. 2004. A computational technique for the dynamics of structure subject to acoustic excitation. In Paper IAC-04-3I.2.09. Presented at the 55th International Astronautical Congress, 4–8 October, Vancouver, Canada.
Djojodihardjo, H., and I. Safari. 2005. Further development of the computational technique for dynamics of structure subjected to acoustic excitation. In Paper IAC-05-C2.2.08, presented at the 56th International Astronautical Congress, 17–21 October, Fukuoka Japan.
Djojodihardjo, H., and I. Safari. 2006. Unified computational scheme for acoustic aeroelastomechanic interaction. In Paper IAC-06-C2.3.09, presented at the 57th International Astronautical Congress 2006, 1–6 October, Valencia Spain.
Djojodihardjo, H. 2007a. BE-FE coupling computational scheme for acoustic effects on aeroelastic structures. In Paper IF-086, Proceedings Of The International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, held at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, 18–20 June.
Djojodihardjo, H. 2007b. BEM-FEM acoustic-structural coupling for spacecraft structure incorporating treatment of irregular frequencies. In Paper IAC.07-C2.3.4, IAC Proceedings, presented at the 58th International Astronautical Congress, 23–28 September 2007, Hyderabad, India.
Djojodihardjo, H. 2008. Unified BE-FE aerodynamic-acoustic-structure coupling scheme for acoustic effects on aeroelastic structures. In Paper I-586, 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 14–19 September, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Holström, F. 2001. Structure-acoustic analysis using BEM/FEM; Implementation in MATLAB®. Master’s Thesis, Copyright © 2001 by Structural Mechanics & Engineering Acoustics, LTH, Sweden, Printed by KFS i Lund AB, Lund, Sweden, May, Homepage: http://www.akustik.lth.
Marquez, A., S. Meddahi, S., and V. Selgas. 2004. A new BEM–FEM coupling strategy for two-dimensional fluid–solid interaction problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 199: 205–220.
Huang, X.Y. 1987. Active control of aerofoil flutter. AIAA Journal 25 (8).
Lu, P.J., and L.J. Huang. 1992. Flutter suppression of thin airfoils using active acoustic excitations. AIAA Journal 30 (12), December.
Nagai, K., K. Toshimitsu, and M. Namba. 1996. Active control of cascade flutter by means of sound waves from duct wall sources. JSME International Journal, Series B 39 (3): 608–614.
Morino, L., and C.C. Kuo. 1974. Subsonic potential aerodynamics for complex configurations: A general theory. AIAA Journal 12 (2), February.
Zingel, H. 1986. Zur Bestimmung des aeroelastischen Verhaltens von Auftriebssystemen infolge von stromungsablosung. DFVLR.
Kreyszig, E. 2006. Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 9th ed. Wiley.
Djojodihardjo, H., and I. Safari. 2013. BEM-FEM coupling for acoustic effects on aeroelastic stability of structures. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences 91 (3): 205–234.
Djojodihardjo, H. 2013. Unified aerodynamic-acoustic formulation for aero-acoustic structure coupling. JMEA 3 (4)
Djojodihardjo, H. 2015. Vibro-acoustic analysis of the acoustic-structure interaction of flexible structure due to acoustic excitation. Acta Astronautica 108: 129–145.
Becker, J., and A. Gravelle. 1985. Some results of experimental and analytical buffeting investigations on a delta wing. In International Symposium on Aeroelasticity, Aachen, April 1–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix: For Case Study II—Calculation of 3D Unsteady Subsonic Flow with Separation Bubble Using Singularity Method
Appendix: For Case Study II—Calculation of 3D Unsteady Subsonic Flow with Separation Bubble Using Singularity Method
1.1 The Singular Part of Kernel Functions
Noting the complexity of the kernel functions, it is intended to integrate them using numerical approach. It is obvious that the singularity contained in the kernel functions will tend to spoil the numerical integration if they are not carefully treated. The usual technique to take care of this problem is to isolate the region in the vicinity of the singular point, and to integrate it in an analytical manner applying a suitable limiting process. The remaining regular kernel can then be easily and accurately integrated using a standard numerical quadrature. The limiting processes for the second and third kernels are well documented in many literatures. Such procedure leads to Eqs. (11.98) and (11.99). Afterward, the singularities of the first and fourth kernel are presented.
The integral in the chordwise direction will contain singularities if η and η ̓take the same values. This situation is closely related to the integration technique applied for the spanwise direction. The singular part of the first kernel can be examined to consist of some poles and a logarithmic function, since the Bessel function has a logarithmic behaviour for small arguments. This singular part is [42]
The singular part of the fourth kernel has a less complexity since the singularity is caused only by the r ̓. Consequently it produces some poles, which can be taken separately as
If these two singular parts obtained are subtracted from the original kernels, the rest will become regular functions which facilitate the numerical treatment of them. Proceeding along this line, then the non-singular of the first and fourth kernel are
1.2 Integration Along the Chordwise Direction
The integration of the first kernel is worked out exactly in the same manner as the one in Laschka [42], where the singular parts are treated analytically and the rest numerically. Proceeding along Laschka’s approach the singular integral is divided into three partsFootnote 15
The Gauss-Jacobian Quadrature is employed for the integration of the non-singular kernel times the series expansion. The quadrature chosen takes the advantage of the series expansion, hr(X), as the weighting function,
where
The components of \(f_{1r} \left( {\xi ,\eta ;\eta } \right)\) are then evaluated one by one using this formula as
and
where the upper boundary of the integral becomes
and
Following Watkins et al.[54], the approximation of the integrand is carried out by expansion like,
Using this expression the integral appeared in Eq. (11.201) could be worked out.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Djojodihardjo, H. (2023). Unsteady Aerodynamics with Case Studies. In: Introduction to Aeroelasticity . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8078-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8078-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8077-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8078-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)