Ethics, Values, and Morality

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology

Abstract

Technologies generate questions. Questions about how to live with them, make them, understand their implications, share their benefits, and limit their harms. Sometimes the questions are specific: what does a new way of doing something mean for those who re-shape their lives around it? At other times, the questions are broader: should this technology exist at all? This section brings together the substantial contributions that anthropologists have made to discussing and analysing the disquiet and awe of technological advance, and the languages—ethics, values, and morality—through which it has been addressed. In this Introduction, we review the anthropology of technology as seen through the lenses of ethics, morality, and values, covering both historical attention to these areas of concern and contemporary work. We then introduce the chapters of this section, situating the seven ethnographies in these broader literatures and narrating their shared concerns. From the embodiment of values in material form to their contestation through conversation, policy, and practice, we make visible the registries of contemporary contestations over technology, and the means by which people struggle to settle normative questions about the form that human futures should take.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, S. L. (2010). Plastic Paradise: Transforming Bodies and Selves in Costa Rica’s Cosmetic Surgery Tourism Industry. Medical Anthropology, 29(4), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2010.501316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, E. M. (1956). The Classification of Values: A Method and Illustration. American Anthropologist, 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anthropology News (1975). Ethical and Human Value Implications of Science and Technology Program. Anthropology News, 16(9), 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barndon, R. (2012). Technology and Morality: Rituals in Iron Working among the Fipa and Pangwa Peoples in Southwest Tanzania. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 21(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beldo, L. (2014). The unconditional ‘ought’: A theoretical model for the anthropology of morality. Anthropological Theory, 14(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499614534373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belshaw, C.S. (1959). The Identification of Values in Anthropology. American Journal of Sociology, 64(6), 555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R. (2016). Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics. Science, Technology and Human Values, 41(6), 967–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., & Inhorn, M. C. (2009). Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with the New Biotechnologies. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, V. (2003) Flesh Wounds: The Culture of Cosmetic Surgery. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. (1954). Hopi Ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvão, F. (2019). Crypto-miners: Digital labor and the power of blockchain technology. Economic Anthropology, 6(1), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campoamor, L. M. (2019). There’s an App for That: Telecom, Children’s Rights and Conflicting Logics of Corporate Social Responsibility. American Anthropologist, 121(3), 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, K. (2018). Best Practice: Management Consulting and the Ethics of Financialization in China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corsín Jiménez, A. (Ed.) (2008). Culture and Well-Being: Anthropological Approaches to Freedom and Political Ethics. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K., & Joler, V. (2018). Anatomy of an AI System. https://anatomyof.ai. Accessed 22 March 2021.

  • Cribb, A., Dunn, M., & Ives, J. (2016). Empirical Bioethics: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csordas, T. J. (2013). Morality as a Cultural System? Current Anthropology 54(5), 523–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, M. S., & Svendsen, M. N. (2018). Treating pigs: Balancing standardisation and individual treatments in translational neonatology research. BioSocieties, 13, 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C., & Rajak D. (2016). The Anthropology of Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Berghahn.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. M., & A. Plakias. (2008). How to Argue about Disagreement: Evaluative Diversity and Moral Realism. In W. Winnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity, Vol. 2 (pp. 303–331). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Jones, R. (2015). A ‘good’ ethical review: ethics audit and professionalism in research ethics. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumit, J. (2014) Writing the Implosion: Teaching the World One Thing at a Time. Cultural Anthropology, 29(2), 344–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, L. (2013 [1980]). On Value: The Radcliffe-Brown Lecture in Social Anthropology, 1980. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 287–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1974). Sociology and philosophy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C. F., & Lee, F. (Eds.) (2015). Value practices in the life sciences and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, C. (1955). The Dominant Value Profile of American Culture. American Anthropologist, 57(6), 1232–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edel, A. (1962). Anthropology and Ethics in Common Focus. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 92(1), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, A. (2007). The poor have the right to be beautiful: Cosmetic surgery in neoliberal Brazil. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13, 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (1999). Why dolly matters: Kinship, culture and cloning. Ethnos, 64(3–4), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (2000). Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Harvey, P., & Wade, P. (2008). Anthropology and Science: Epistemologies in Practice. ASA Monographs 43. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • English-Lueck, J. A., & Lueck Avery, M. (2017). Intensifying Work and Chasing Innovation: Incorporating Care in Silicon Valley. Anthropology of Work Review, 38(1), 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, M. I., & Aronczyk, M. (2021). Big data for climate action or climate action for big data? Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982032.

  • Farmer, P. (1999). Infections and Inequalities: The Modern Plagues. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2012). A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2014). The Ethical Turn in Anthropology: Promises and Uncertainties. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 429–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. (2007). Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. (1953). The study of values by social anthropologists. Man, 231, 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. (1979). Work and Value: Reflections on Ideas of Karl Marx. In S. Wallman (Ed.), Social Anthropology of Work (pp. 177–206). London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, M. (1987). Religion, Morality, and the Person: Essays on Tallensi Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. C., & Swazey, J. P. (1984) Medical morality is not bioethics: medical ethics in China and the United States. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 27, 336–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. C., & Swazey, J. P. (1992). Observing Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammeltoft, T. (2014). Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gammeltoft, T. M., & Wahlberg, A. (2014). Selective Reproductive Technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43(1), 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, D. N., Curry, O.S., Cook, J., Alfano, M., & S. Venkatesen. (2020). Morality is fundamentally an evolved solution to problems of social co-operation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 26(2), 415–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. (1999). Making the Body Beautiful: A Cultural History of Aesthetic Surgery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2018). Counterproductive: Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2018). Bullshit Jobs: A Theory. New York: Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, C., Trentemøller, S., & Sorensen, J. (2018). The use of ethnography to identify and address ethical, legal and societal (ELS) issues. HRI’ 18 Companion, March 5–8, 2018, Chicago IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, K., & Simpson, B. (2015). Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Third Phase: Global Encounters and Emerging Moral Worlds. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1990). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Late 20th Century, In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 149–81). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2011). Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s Generations: Taking care of unexpected country. Australian Humanities Review, 50, May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (2003). When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, M. (Ed.) (2009). The Anthropology of Moralities. London: Berghahn

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. J. (2007). Self-Transformations: Foucault, Ethics, and Normalized Bodies. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S. (Ed.) (1997). The Ethnography of Moralities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer, K. (2005). Studying Ethics as Policy. Current Anthropology, 46(5), S71–S90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer, K. (2006). “Ethics wars”: Reflections on the Antagonism between Bioethicists and Social Science Observers of Biomedicine. Human Studies, 29, 203–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer K. (2009). Informed Consent: the Making of a Ubiquitous Rule in Medical Practice. Organization, 16(2), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer, K. (2020). Ethics as a form of regulation in relation to data and bodily materials. In M.-A. Jacob & A. Kirkland (Eds.), Research Handbook on Socio-Legal Studies of Medicine and Health (pp. 333–348). Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer, K. & Tutton, R. (2005). “Ethics was here”: studying the language-games of ethics in the case of UK Biobank. Critical Public Health, 15(4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590500523533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeyer, K., & Hogle, L. F. (2014). Informed Consent: The Politics of Intent and Practice in Medical Research Ethics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutel, O. (2021). Blockchain imperialism in the Pacific. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720985249.

  • Kapferer, B., & Gold, M. (2018). Moral Anthropology: A Critique. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, W. (2016). Ethical life. Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, S. (2018). The Bumipreneur dilemma and Malaysia’s technology start-up ecosystem. Economic Anthropology 5(1): 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, A. (1999). Experience and its moral modes: culture, human conditions, and disorder. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, A. (2006). What really matters: living a moral life amidst uncertainty and danger. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action: an Exploration in Definition and Classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Towards a General Theory of Action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1956). Towards a Comparison of Value-emphases in Different Cultures. In L. White (Ed.), The State of the Social Sciences. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, M. (2005). Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductive Gift Exchange between British Ova Donors and Recipients. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroløkke, C. (2018). Global Fluids: The cultural politics of Reproductive Waste and Value. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladkin, S., McKay, R., & Bojesen, E. (Eds.) (2016). Against Value in the Arts and Education. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, A., & Collier, S. (2004). Ethics and the anthropology of modern reason. Anthropological Theory, 4(4), 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, J. (2002). For an Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(2), 311–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, J. (2014). The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. (2008). Value and Virtue. Anthropological Theory, 8(2), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. (Ed.) (2010). Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language and Action. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, M. (2001). Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luca. (2017). Whitepaper_ Data as a Force for Good. https://luca-d3.com/data-for-good#data-force-good-section. Accessed 22 June 2021.

  • Manelin, E. B. (2020). Health Care Quality Improvement and the Ambiguous Commodity of Care. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 34(3), 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marett, R. R. (1931). The beginnings of morals and culture: an introduction to social anthropology. In W. Rose (Ed.), An Outline of Modern Knowledge (pp. 395–430) New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1991). The Egg and the Sperm: How Science has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles. Signs, 16(3), 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, C. (2012). Two virtue ethics and the anthropology of morality. Anthropological Theory, 12(2), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, C. (2014). Moral Laboratories. Family Peril and the Struggle for a Good Life. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, C., & Throop, J. (2018). The Anthropology of Ethics and Morality. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47(1), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., Moss, E., & boyd, d. (2019). Owning Ethics: Corporate Logics, Silicon Valley and the Institutionalization of Ethics. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 82(2), 449–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2008). The uses of value. Geoforum, 39(3), 1122–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2010). Care and its values. Good food in the nursing home. In A. Mol, I. Moser & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 215–234), Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelms, T. C., Maurer, B., Swartz, L. & Mainwaring, S. (2017). Social Payments: Innovation, Trust, Bitcoin, and the Sharing Economy. Theory, Culture, and Society, 35(3), 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2010 [1987]). Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (1988). The production of possession: spirits and the multinational corporation in Malaysia. American Ethnologist, 15(1), 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A., & Collier, S. (2005). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. H. (2009). Two concepts of empirical ethics. Bioethics 23(4), 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish, S. (1994). Moral Knowing in a Hindu Sacred City. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. (2011). The Politics of Bioethics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petryna, A. (2005). Ethical Variability: Drug Development and Globalizing Clinical Trials. American Ethnologist, 32(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petryna, A. (2009). When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggiali, L. (2016). Seeing (from) digital peripheries: Technology and Transparency in Kenya’s Silicon Savannah. Cultural Anthropology, 31, 387–411. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.3.07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pols, J. (2018). Empirical ethics and the study of care. Web publication/site, Somatosphere. http://somatosphere.net/2018/11/a-readers-guide-to-the-anthropology-of-ethics-and-morality-part-iii.html. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  • Powers, W. R. (2000). The Harvard Study of Values: Mirror for Postwar Anthropology. The History of the Behavioural Sciences, 36(2), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1999). French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1987). Moral pioneers: women, men and fetuses on a frontier of reproductive technology. Women Health, 13(1–2), 101–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, K. (1955). Morality and the Concept of the Person among the Gahuku-Gama. Oceania, 25(4), 233–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. (2016). The asymmetrical ‘relationship’: parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. SIGCAS Comput. Soc., 45(3), 290–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2012). On becoming ethical subjects: freedom, constraint and the anthropology of morality. Anthropology of this Century, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2016). What is the matter with transcendence? On the place of religion in the new anthropology of ethics. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(4), 767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. F. S. (2013). Assisted Existence: an ethnography of being in Ecuador. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19, 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, F. C., & Moll, T. (2020). Assisted Reproduction: Politics, Ethics and Anthropological Futures. Medical Anthropology, 39(6), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2019.1695130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydstrom, H. (2003). Embodying Morality: Growing Up in Rural Northern Vietnam. Honolulu: University Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, R. (2017). Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy, and the new biometric body projects. Body & Society, 23(1), 36–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). The primacy of the ethical: Proposals for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, N., & Suchman, L. (2013). Wishful Mnemonics and Autonomous Killing Machines. AISB Quarterly, 136, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, T. (2013). Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism, Vol. 14. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, T. (2016). Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L. (2011). Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2005). Robust Knowledge and Fragile Futures. In A. Ong & S. Collier (Eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (pp. 464–481). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoczkowski, W. (2008). The ‘fourth aim’ of anthropology: between knowledge and ethics. Anthropological Theory, 8(4), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, K. (Ed.) (2009). Ethnographies of Moral Reasoning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, C. E. (2021). Performing Accountability and Corporate Social Responsibility. Political and Legal Anthropology Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12397.

  • Taussig, K-S. (2009). Ordinary Genomes: Science, Citizenship and Genetic Identities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka, S., & Trundle, C. (2017). Competing Responsibilities. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trundle, C. (2020). Tinkering Care, State Responsibility and Abandonment: Nuclear Test Veterans and The Mismatched Temporalities of Justice in Claims for Health Care. Anthropology and Humanism, 45(2), 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oudheusden, M. (2014). Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, S. (2020). Afterword: Putting together the anthropology of tax and the anthropology of ethics. Social Analysis, 64(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg, A. (2018) Good Quality: The Routinization of Sperm Banking in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, B. (2016). Real Pigs: Shifting Values in the Field of Local Pork, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, G. (Ed.) (1990). Social Science Perspectives on Biomedical Ethics. Dortmund: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welker, M. A. (2009). Corporate Security Begins in the Community: Mining, the Corporate Social Responsibility Industry, and Environmental Advocacy in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 24(1), 142–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigon, J. (2007). Moral breakdown and the ethical demand: A theoretical framework for an anthropology of moralities. Anthropological Theory, 7(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigon, J. (2008). Morality: An Anthropological Perspective. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigon, J. (2009). Within a Range of Possibilities: Morality and Ethics in Social Life. Ethnos, 74(2), 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigon, J. (2013). On Love: Remaking Moral Subjectivity in Postrehabilitation Russia. American Ethnologist, 40(1), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H., Landeweerd, L. & van Rooij, A. (2014). Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Douglas-Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Douglas-Jones, R., Bruun, M.H., Kristensen, D.B. (2022). Ethics, Values, and Morality. In: Bruun, M.H., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7084-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation