The Association of Neighbourhood Aesthetics with Physical Activity in Gated and Non-gated Neighbourhoods in Develo** Countries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 2021 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Architecture

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 201))

  • 761 Accesses

Abstract

Neighborhood Aesthetics are considered important for enhancing the physical activity among people and gated neighborhoods have more aesthetical features than non-gated. The objective of this study is to compare the association of perceived aesthetics and perception of physical activity (PoPA) in gated and non-gated neighborhoods in develo** countries. Sixteen neighborhoods and 1042 participants were selected from Karachi, Pakistan. Results show that both the perceived aesthetics and PoPA are significantly higher and dependent on each other in gated neighborhoods than non-gated neighborhoods of develo** countries. Therefore, it can be concluded that the future neighborhoods should have aesthetical feature for encouraging PA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), or simply metabolic equivalent, is a physiological measure expressing the energy cost of physical activities and is defined as the ratio of metabolic rate (and therefore the rate of energy consumption) during a specific physical activity to a reference metabolic rate, set by convention to 3.5 ml O2 kg−1 min−1 or equivalently:

    \(1\,{\text{MET}} = 1\frac{{{\text{kcal}}}}{{{\text{kg}}*{\text{h}}}} = 4.184\frac{{{\text{kJ}}}}{{{\text{kg}}*{\text{h}}}}\)

References

  1. World Health Organization (2010) Global recommendations on physical activity for health. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

    Google Scholar 

  2. Handy S (2004) Community design and physical activity: what do we know? And what don't we know? Obesity and the built environment: improving public health through community design, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gul Y, Sultan Z, Jokhio GA (2020) Contribution to the environmental sustainability by improving the walking behaviour through neighbourhoods’ design with special reference to develo** countries, E3S Web Conf 02002

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gul Y (2021) The effectiveness of walkability index for social sustainability in develo** countries using geographical information system. J Des Sci Appl Arts 364–384

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gul Y, Jokhio GA, Bibi T (2020) Walk towards sustainability: improved neighbourhood street connectivity helps. E3S Web Conf 211

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gul Y (2017) Effects of neighborhood environment on physical activities in gated and non-gated neighborhoods in Karachi, Pakistan. University Technology Malaysia, Johar Bahru

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lovasi GS, Schwarts-Soicher O, Neckerman K, Konty K, Kerker B, Quinn J, Rundle A (2013) Aesthetic amenities and safety hazards associated with walking and bicycling for transportation in New York City, Ann Behav Med, pp 76–85

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D (2003) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 1552–1558

    Google Scholar 

  9. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E (2002) Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity—a review. Am J Preventive Med 188–199

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mota J, Almeida M, Santos P, Ribeiro JC (2005) Perceived neighborhood environments and physical activity in adolescents. Preventive Med 834–836

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gul Y, Sultan Z, Moeinaddini M, Jokhio G (2018) The effects of physical activity facilities on vigorous physical activity in gated and non-gated neighborhoods. Land Use Policy 77:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoehner CM, Ramirez LKB, Elliott MB (2005) Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Preventive Med 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N (2001) Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Am J Preventive Med 434–440

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gul Y, Sultan Z, Moeinaddini M, Jokhio GA (2019) The effects of socio-demographic factors on physical activity in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods in Karachi, Pakistan. Sport Soc 1225–1239

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson EA, Pearce J, Mitchell R, Kinghamc S (2013) Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public Health 318–324

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blakely EJ, Snyder MG (1997) Divided we fall: gated and walled communities in the United States. In: Ellin N (ed) Architecture of fear. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Breitung W (2012) Enclave urbanism in China: attitudes towards gated communities in Guangzhou. Urban Geogr 33(2):278–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leisch H (2002) Gated communities in Indonesia. Cities 19(5):341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gul Y, Sultan Z, Johar F (2016) Effects of neighborhood’s built environment on physical activities in gated communities: a review. Int J Built Environ Sustain 60–69

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gul Y, Sultan Z, Moeinaddini M, Jokhio GA (2018) Measuring the differences of neighborhood environment and physical activity in gated and non-gated neighborhoods in Karachi, Pakistan. Urban Design 24(3):494–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gul Y, Sultan Z, Jokhio GA (2018) The association between the perception of crime and walking in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods of Asian develo** countries. Heliyon e00715

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasmeen Gul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gul, Y., Jokhio, G.A., Bibi, T., Zaidi, S.M. (2022). The Association of Neighbourhood Aesthetics with Physical Activity in Gated and Non-gated Neighbourhoods in Develo** Countries. In: Kang, T., Lee, Y. (eds) Proceedings of 2021 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Architecture. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 201. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6932-3_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6932-3_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6931-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6932-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation