Abstract
Kinetic energy available in river streams can be harnessed to produce electricity in remote villages where power grid is unavailable. Savonius hydrokinetic turbine (SHKT) can be the solution to this issue as it is easy to construct, environment friendly and cost-effective. The performance of SHKT depends on the turbine geometry, the blade profile and the properties of the fluid. The experimental setup to evaluate the influence of these parameters in the laboratory can be very costly as it requires a huge water channel setup. Therefore, it is economical and timesaving to resort to computational analyses such as Ansys Fluent, Ansys CFX and OpenFOAM before experimenting. In the present study, the performance of the SHKT in terms of power coefficient (Cp) was performed computationally (both 2D and 3D) on the commercial CFD Fluent software. Commercial unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) solver with K-ω SST turbulence model was used for numerical analysis. For 2D and 3D CFD analyses, the turbine and blade particulars were taken from the work of Talukdar et al. [Talukdar et al. in Energy Conversion and Management 158:36–49, 2018] and Vimal et al. [Patel et al. in International Journal of Energy Research 41:829–844, 2017], respectively. Two-bladed Savonius turbines of semi-circular conventional blades were used to perform both the studies. The computational results of 2D and 3D were compared with the previous respective experiment results and there seemed to exist a good agreement in the 3D case (in 3D CFD, R2 = 0.7 and 2D CFD, R2 = 0.380). The deviaton of the computational value from the corresponding maximum experimental value (Cp) was found to be 38.9% in case of 2D CFD and 6.4% in case of 3D CFD.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C p :
-
Power coefficient (Dimensionless)
- \(C_{m}\) :
-
Torque coefficient (Dimensionless)
- A :
-
Projected area (m2)
- U :
-
Free stream velocity (m/s)
- H :
-
Height of the turbine (m)
- D :
-
Diameter of the turbine (m)
- e :
-
Overlap ratio (Dimensionless)
- ω :
-
Angular velocity (rad/s)
- λ :
-
Tip-speed ratio (TSR) (Dimensionless)
- ρ :
-
Density (kg/m3)
References
Talukdar, P. K., Sardar, A., Kulkarni, V., & Saha, U. K. (2018). Parametric analysis of model Savonius hydrokinetic turbines through experimental and computational investigations. Energy Conversion and Management, 158, 36–49.
Patel, V., Bhat, G., Eldho, T. I., & Prabhu, S. V. (2017). Influence of overlap ratio and aspect ratio on the performance of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine. International Journal of Energy Research, 41(6), 829–844.
Kamoji, M. A., Kedare, S. B., & Prabhu, S. V. (2008). Experimental investigations on single stage, two stage and three stage conventional Savonius rotor. International Journal of Energy Research, 32(2008), 877–895.
Khan, M. J., Bhuyan, G., Iqbal, M. T., & Quaicoe, J. E. (2009). Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology status review. Applied Energy, 86(10), 1823–1835.
Gupta, R., Biswas, A., & Sharma, K. K. (2008). Comparative study of a three-bucket Savonius rotor with a combined three-bucket Savonius-three-bladed Darrieus rotor. Renewable Energy, 33(9), 1974–1981.
Sarma, N. K., Biswas, A., & Misra, R. D. (2014). Experimental and computational evaluation of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine for low velocity condition with comparison to Savonius wind turbine at the same input power. Energy Conversion and Management, 83, 88–98.
Mabrouki, I., Driss, Z., & Abid, M. S. (2014). Experimental investigation of the height effect of water Savonius rotors. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 4(1), 8–12.
Kumar, A., & Saini, R. P. (2017). Performance analysis of a Savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renewable Energy, 108, 502–522.
Kailash, G., Eldho, T. I., & Prabhu, S. V. (2012). Performance study of modified savonius water turbine with two deflector plates. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2012.
Kumar, A., & Saini, R. P. (2017). Performance analysis of a single stage modified Savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renewable Energy, 113, 461–478.
Patel, C. R., Patel, V. K., Prabhu, S. V., & Eldho, T. I. (2013). Investigation of overlap ratio for Savonius type vertical axis hydro turbine. 2, 379–383.
Pham, L., & Member, S. (2014). Riverine hydrokinetic technology : A review (pp. 1–6). Oregon Tech—Ree516 Term Pap.
Jones, B. (1889). Elements of aerodynamics. New York: J. Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rengma, T.S., Subbarao, P.M.V. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Savonius Type Ultra-Micro Hydrokinetic Turbine of Experimental and Computational Investigation. In: Mahanta, P., Kalita, P., Paul, A., Banerjee, A. (eds) Advances in Thermofluids and Renewable Energy . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3497-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3497-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3496-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3497-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)