Comparative Analysis of Savonius Type Ultra-Micro Hydrokinetic Turbine of Experimental and Computational Investigation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Thermofluids and Renewable Energy

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Kinetic energy available in river streams can be harnessed to produce electricity in remote villages where power grid is unavailable. Savonius hydrokinetic turbine (SHKT) can be the solution to this issue as it is easy to construct, environment friendly and cost-effective. The performance of SHKT depends on the turbine geometry, the blade profile and the properties of the fluid. The experimental setup to evaluate the influence of these parameters in the laboratory can be very costly as it requires a huge water channel setup. Therefore, it is economical and timesaving to resort to computational analyses such as Ansys Fluent, Ansys CFX and OpenFOAM before experimenting. In the present study, the performance of the SHKT in terms of power coefficient (Cp) was performed computationally (both 2D and 3D) on the commercial CFD Fluent software. Commercial unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) solver with K-ω SST turbulence model was used for numerical analysis. For 2D and 3D CFD analyses, the turbine and blade particulars were taken from the work of Talukdar et al. [Talukdar et al. in Energy Conversion and Management 158:36–49, 2018] and Vimal et al. [Patel et al. in International Journal of Energy Research 41:829–844, 2017], respectively. Two-bladed Savonius turbines of semi-circular conventional blades were used to perform both the studies. The computational results of 2D and 3D were compared with the previous respective experiment results and there seemed to exist a good agreement in the 3D case (in 3D CFD, R2 = 0.7 and 2D CFD, R2 = 0.380). The deviaton of the computational value from the corresponding maximum experimental value (Cp) was found to be 38.9% in case of 2D CFD and 6.4% in case of 3D CFD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C p :

Power coefficient (Dimensionless)

\(C_{m}\) :

Torque coefficient (Dimensionless)

A :

Projected area (m2)

U :

Free stream velocity (m/s)

H :

Height of the turbine (m)

D :

Diameter of the turbine (m)

e :

Overlap ratio (Dimensionless)

ω :

Angular velocity (rad/s)

λ :

Tip-speed ratio (TSR) (Dimensionless)

ρ :

Density (kg/m3)

References

  1. Talukdar, P. K., Sardar, A., Kulkarni, V., & Saha, U. K. (2018). Parametric analysis of model Savonius hydrokinetic turbines through experimental and computational investigations. Energy Conversion and Management, 158, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel, V., Bhat, G., Eldho, T. I., & Prabhu, S. V. (2017). Influence of overlap ratio and aspect ratio on the performance of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine. International Journal of Energy Research, 41(6), 829–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamoji, M. A., Kedare, S. B., & Prabhu, S. V. (2008). Experimental investigations on single stage, two stage and three stage conventional Savonius rotor. International Journal of Energy Research, 32(2008), 877–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan, M. J., Bhuyan, G., Iqbal, M. T., & Quaicoe, J. E. (2009). Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology status review. Applied Energy, 86(10), 1823–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, R., Biswas, A., & Sharma, K. K. (2008). Comparative study of a three-bucket Savonius rotor with a combined three-bucket Savonius-three-bladed Darrieus rotor. Renewable Energy, 33(9), 1974–1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarma, N. K., Biswas, A., & Misra, R. D. (2014). Experimental and computational evaluation of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine for low velocity condition with comparison to Savonius wind turbine at the same input power. Energy Conversion and Management, 83, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mabrouki, I., Driss, Z., & Abid, M. S. (2014). Experimental investigation of the height effect of water Savonius rotors. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 4(1), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar, A., & Saini, R. P. (2017). Performance analysis of a Savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renewable Energy, 108, 502–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kailash, G., Eldho, T. I., & Prabhu, S. V. (2012). Performance study of modified savonius water turbine with two deflector plates. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, A., & Saini, R. P. (2017). Performance analysis of a single stage modified Savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renewable Energy, 113, 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel, C. R., Patel, V. K., Prabhu, S. V., & Eldho, T. I. (2013). Investigation of overlap ratio for Savonius type vertical axis hydro turbine. 2, 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pham, L., & Member, S. (2014). Riverine hydrokinetic technology : A review (pp. 1–6). Oregon Tech—Ree516 Term Pap.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, B. (1889). Elements of aerodynamics. New York: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rengma, T.S., Subbarao, P.M.V. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Savonius Type Ultra-Micro Hydrokinetic Turbine of Experimental and Computational Investigation. In: Mahanta, P., Kalita, P., Paul, A., Banerjee, A. (eds) Advances in Thermofluids and Renewable Energy . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3497-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3497-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3496-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3497-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation