Abstract
In raster remote sensing images within class have variations represented as heterogeneity. Pixel-based classifiers use means/variance-covariance (DVC) statistical parameters, generated from training sample datasets. These parameters do not represent in totality about variations within class. This research paper explains the role of each sample in handling heterogeneity without using statistical parameters from the training samples. Modified possibilistic c-means fuzzy algorithm capable of map** single class to handle heterogeneity has been experimented. Multi-spectral temporal images of Sentinel-2A/B of Banasthali, Rajasthan region acquired from 1 November 2019 to 24 February 2020 have been used for mustard class map**. It has been observed that while using individual samples in place of statistical parameters in fuzzy-based classifiers, individual class identified has been least affected due to heterogeneity within class.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben-hur A, Horn D, Siegelmann HT, Vapinik V (2001) Support vector clustering. J Mach Learn Res 2:125–137
Berhane TM, Costa H, Lane CR, Anenkhonov OA, Chepinoga VV, Autrey BC (2019) The influence of region of interest heterogeneity on classification accuracy in wetland systems. Remote Sens 11(5):551. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050551
Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10(2):191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(84)90020-7
Birth GS, McVey GR (1968) Measuring the color of growing turf with a reflectance spectrophotometer. Am Soc Agronomy 60:640–643
Byju A (2015) Non-linear separation of classes using a kernel based fuzzy c-means (KFCM) approach. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede
Campbell JB (1996) Introduction to remote sensing, pp 337–349
Chawla S (2010) Possibilistic c-means-spatial contextual information based sub-pixel classification approach for multi-spectral data. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede
Cohen WB (1991) Temporal versus spatial variation in leaf reflectance under changing water stress conditions. Int J Remote Sens 12(9):1865–1876
Fisher F, Chien S, Lo E, Greeley R (1999) SAR image processing using artificial intelligence planning. Solid State Sci 3:856–861. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAP.1999.797702
Kandpal N (2016) Non-linear separation of classes using kernel based possibilistic c-means. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede
Krishnapuram R, Keller JM (1993) A possibilistic approach to clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1(2):98–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.227387
Li KAI, Huang H, Li K (2003) A modified PCM clustering algorithm. In: 2nd international conference on machine learning and cybernetics
Li H, Reynolds JF (1995) On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73(2):280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545921
Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (1979) Remote sensing and image interpretation, pp 465–670
Misra G, Kumar A, Patel NR, Zurita-Milla R, Singh A (2012) Map** specific crop-A multi sensor temporal approach. In: 2012 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), pp 3034–3037
Richards JA, Jia X (2013) Remote sensing digital image analysis. J. Chem. Inform. Model. 4th ed., vol 53. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Freden SC, Mercanti EP, Becker M (eds) Third earth resources technology satellite–1 syposium, vol I. Technical presentations, NASA SP-351. NASA, Washington, DC, pp 309–317
Sengupta I, Kumar A, Dwivedi R (2019). Performance evaluation of kernel-based supervised noise clustering approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-00938-2
Singh A, Kumar A (2019) Fuzzy based approach to incorporate spatial constraints in possibilistic c-means algorithm for remotely sensed imagery. In: International conference on sustainable computing in science, technology & management, 20 February 2019, p 5, Jaipur. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3354465
Yang A, Jiang L, Zhou Y (2007) A KFCM-based fuzzy classifier. In: Fourth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singhal, M., Payal, A., Kumar, A. (2021). Role of Individual Samples in Modified Possibilistic c-Means Classifier for Handling Heterogeneity Within Mustard Crop. In: Tiwari, A., Ahuja, K., Yadav, A., Bansal, J.C., Deep, K., Nagar, A.K. (eds) Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1393. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2712-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2712-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2711-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2712-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)