Role of Individual Samples in Modified Possibilistic c-Means Classifier for Handling Heterogeneity Within Mustard Crop

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing for Problem Solving

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1393))

Abstract

In raster remote sensing images within class have variations represented as heterogeneity. Pixel-based classifiers use means/variance-covariance (DVC) statistical parameters, generated from training sample datasets. These parameters do not represent in totality about variations within class. This research paper explains the role of each sample in handling heterogeneity without using statistical parameters from the training samples. Modified possibilistic c-means fuzzy algorithm capable of map** single class to handle heterogeneity has been experimented. Multi-spectral temporal images of Sentinel-2A/B of Banasthali, Rajasthan region acquired from 1 November 2019 to 24 February 2020 have been used for mustard class map**. It has been observed that while using individual samples in place of statistical parameters in fuzzy-based classifiers, individual class identified has been least affected due to heterogeneity within class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ben-hur A, Horn D, Siegelmann HT, Vapinik V (2001) Support vector clustering. J Mach Learn Res 2:125–137

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Berhane TM, Costa H, Lane CR, Anenkhonov OA, Chepinoga VV, Autrey BC (2019) The influence of region of interest heterogeneity on classification accuracy in wetland systems. Remote Sens 11(5):551. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050551

  3. Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10(2):191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(84)90020-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birth GS, McVey GR (1968) Measuring the color of growing turf with a reflectance spectrophotometer. Am Soc Agronomy 60:640–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Byju A (2015) Non-linear separation of classes using a kernel based fuzzy c-means (KFCM) approach. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell JB (1996) Introduction to remote sensing, pp 337–349

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chawla S (2010) Possibilistic c-means-spatial contextual information based sub-pixel classification approach for multi-spectral data. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen WB (1991) Temporal versus spatial variation in leaf reflectance under changing water stress conditions. Int J Remote Sens 12(9):1865–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher F, Chien S, Lo E, Greeley R (1999) SAR image processing using artificial intelligence planning. Solid State Sci 3:856–861. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAP.1999.797702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kandpal N (2016) Non-linear separation of classes using kernel based possibilistic c-means. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnapuram R, Keller JM (1993) A possibilistic approach to clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1(2):98–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.227387

  12. Li KAI, Huang H, Li K (2003) A modified PCM clustering algorithm. In: 2nd international conference on machine learning and cybernetics

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li H, Reynolds JF (1995) On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73(2):280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545921

  14. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (1979) Remote sensing and image interpretation, pp 465–670

    Google Scholar 

  15. Misra G, Kumar A, Patel NR, Zurita-Milla R, Singh A (2012) Map** specific crop-A multi sensor temporal approach. In: 2012 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), pp 3034–3037

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richards JA, Jia X (2013) Remote sensing digital image analysis. J. Chem. Inform. Model. 4th ed., vol 53. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Freden SC, Mercanti EP, Becker M (eds) Third earth resources technology satellite–1 syposium, vol I. Technical presentations, NASA SP-351. NASA, Washington, DC, pp 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sengupta I, Kumar A, Dwivedi R (2019). Performance evaluation of kernel-based supervised noise clustering approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-00938-2

  19. Singh A, Kumar A (2019) Fuzzy based approach to incorporate spatial constraints in possibilistic c-means algorithm for remotely sensed imagery. In: International conference on sustainable computing in science, technology & management, 20 February 2019, p 5, Jaipur. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3354465

  20. Yang A, Jiang L, Zhou Y (2007) A KFCM-based fuzzy classifier. In: Fourth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singhal, M., Payal, A., Kumar, A. (2021). Role of Individual Samples in Modified Possibilistic c-Means Classifier for Handling Heterogeneity Within Mustard Crop. In: Tiwari, A., Ahuja, K., Yadav, A., Bansal, J.C., Deep, K., Nagar, A.K. (eds) Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1393. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2712-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation