SpringerLink
Log in

Somaclonal Variation in Improvement of Agricultural Crops: Recent Progress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Biotechnology: Latest Research and Trends

  • 1867 Accesses

Abstract

Genetic variability induced by cell and tissue culture provides a new source of variation within a species that can be utilized for crop improvement. The selection of novel variants through in vitro induced somaclonal variation helps in the generation of new cultivars with many important agronomic traits, which may be exploited in agriculture for breeding purpose. Some desirable characteristics can also be achieved by in vitro selection pressure technique. During the last 3–4 decades, several useful somaclonal variants particularly linked to the agronomic and agriculturally useful traits like yield, nutrient quality, disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, etc. have been selected and few of them have been released as cultivars for commercial production. However, selection of somaclonal variants for crop improvement has some major limitations like selection of undesirable traits, genetic instability and loss of regeneration after selection. Therefore, many efforts are needed to achieve desired results. In this chapter, the source and genetic basis of somaclonal variation, its detection methods and advantages of somaclonal variation in agriculture with main emphasis on some useful somaclonal variants released as a cultivar are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 175.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 219.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 219.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelnour-Esquivel A, Perez J, Rojas M, Vargas W, Gatica-Arias A (2020) Use of gamma radiation to induce mutations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and the selection of lines with tolerance to salinity and drought. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 56:88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Anil VS, Bennur S, Lobo S (2018) Somaclonal variations for crop improvement: selection for disease resistant variants in vitro. Plant Sci Today 5:44–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arihara A, Kita T, Igarashi S, Goto M, Irikura Y (1995) White Baron: a non-browning somaclonal variant of Danshakuimo (Irish cobbler). Am J Potato Res 72:701–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafzadeh S, Leung DW (2017) Novel potato plants with enhanced cadmium resistance and antioxidative defence generated after in vitro cell line selection. PLoS One 12:e0185621

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bairu MW, Aremu AO, Van Staden J (2011) Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul 63:147–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari HR, Bhanu AN, Srivastava K, Singh MN, Shreya HA (2017) Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants—an overview. Adv Plants Agric Res 7(3):279–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhojwani SS, Dantu PK (2013) Somaclonal variation in: plant tissue culture: an introductory text. Springer, New York, pp 141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradai F, Pliego-Alfaro F, Sanchez-Romero C (2016) Somaclonal variation in olive (Olea europaea L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis: influence of genotype and culture age on phenotypic stability. Sci Hortic 213:208–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Brar DS, Jain SM (1998) Somaclonal variation: mechanism and application in crop improvement. In: Jain SM, Brar DS, Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal variation and induced mutations in crop improvement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BC, LeMare S, Piperidis G, Godwin ID (2011) IRAP, a retrotransposon-based marker system for the detection of somaclonal variation in barley. Mol Breed 27:193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Z, Sui S, Cai X, Yang Q, Deng Z (2016) Somaclonal variation in ‘red flash’ caladium: morphological, cytological and molecular characterization. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 126:269–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carloni E, Tommasino E, Colomba EL, Ribotta A, Quiroga M, Griffa S, Grunberg K (2017) In vitro selection and characterization of buffelgrass somaclones with different responses to water stress. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 130:265–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty N, Banerjee M, Acharya K (2020) In vitro selection of elite clone of Withania somnifera against leaf blight disease caused by Alternaria alternata. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 112:101560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cichorz S, Gośka M, Mańkowski DR (2018) Miscanthus×giganteus: regeneration system with assessment of genetic and epigenetic stability in long-term in vitro culture. Ind Crop Prod 116:150–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Daub ME (1986) Tissue culture and the selection of resistance to pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24:159–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhaut T, Van Houtven W, Bruznican S, Leus L, Van Huylenbroeck J (2020) Somaclonal variation in Chrysanthemum × morifolium protoplast regenerants. Front Plant Sci 11:607171

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Leal CA, Puente-Garza CA, Garcia-Lara S (2018) In vitro plant tissue culture: means for production of biological active compounds. Planta 247:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA (1989) Somaclonal variation—genetic basis and breeding applications. Trends Genet 5:46–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flores PS, Otoni WC, Dhingra OD, Souza Diniz SPS, Santos TM, Bruckner CH (2012) In vitro selection of yellow passion fruit genotypes for resistance to Fusarium vascular wilt. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 108:37–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fossi M, Amundson K, Kuppu S, Britt A, Comai L (2019) Regeneration of Solanum tuberosum plants from protoplasts induces widespread genome instability. Plant Physiol 180:78–86

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gao MW (1992) Hezu 8, a new wheat variety developed with in vitro mutation technique. Nuclear Phys Rev 9:45–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Ran L, Kong Y, Jiang J, Sokolov V, Wang Y (2014) Assessment of DNA methylation changes in tissue culture of Brassica napus. Russian J Genet 50:1338–1344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge H, Li Y, Fu H, Long G, Luo L, Li R, Deng Z (2015) Production of sweet orange somaclones tolerant to citrus canker disease by in vitro mutagenesis with EMS. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 123:29–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Germana MA, Aleza P, Grosser JW, Dutt M, Wang N, Cuenca J, Kaur P (2020) Citrus biotechnology. In: Talon M, Caruso M, Gmitter FG (eds) The genus citrus. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 171–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghane SG, Lokhande VH, Nikam TD (2014) Growth, physiological, and biochemical responses in relation to salinity tolerance for in vitro selection in oil seed crop Guizotia abyssinica Cass. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 17:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez AI, Saiz A, Acedo A, Ruiz ML et al (2013) Analysis of genomic DNA methylation patterns in regenerated and control plants of rye (Secale cereale L.). Plant Growth Regul 70:227–236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosser JW, Gmitter FG, Chandler JL (1997) Development of improved sweet orange cultivars using tissue culture methods. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 110:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Halim NAA, Tan BC, Midin MR, Madon M, Khalid N, Yaacob JS (2018) Abscisic acid and salinity stress induced somaclonal variation and increased histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity in Ananas comosus var. MD2. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 133:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz DJ (1973) Sugarcane improvement through induced mutations using vegetative propagules and cell culture techniques. Induced mutations in vegetatively propagated plants. In: Proceedings of a panel, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Heszky LE, Simon-Kiss I, Do Quangh B (1996) Release of rice variety ‘DAMA’ developed through haploid somaclone breeding. In: YPS B (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Somaclonal variation in crop improvement II. Springer, Berlin, pp 46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SC, Ko WH (2004) Cavendish banana cultivars resistant to Fusarium wilt acquired through somaclonal variation. Plant Dis 88:580–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SM (2001) Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118:153–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalaja NC, Sreenivasan TV, Pawar SM, Bhoi PG, Garker RM (2006) Co94012—a new sugarcane variety through somaclonal variation. Sugar Tech 8:132–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler HF, Rhee Y (2000) Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol Biol 43:179–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan AK (2011) Microsatelite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica 177:309–334

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karp A (1995) Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improvement. Euphytica 85:295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar RK, Chopra VL (1995) A somaclone of Brassica juncea is processed into a variety and is released for commercial cultivation in India. Cruciferae Newslett 17:92–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna H, Alizadeh M, Singh D, Singh U, Chauhan N, Eftekhari M, Sadh RK (2016) Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech 6:54

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi M, Tlaskal J (1974) Fiji disease resistant Saccharum officinarum var Pindar subclones from tissue cultures. Proc Int Soc Sugarcane Technol 15:130–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumari G, Kanwar K, Soni M, Sharma D (2017) In vitro selection of cell lines in Punica granatum L. (Daru) against bacterial blight. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sec B Biol Sci 87:591–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Landey RB, Cenci A, Guyot R (2015) Assessment of genetic and epigenetic changes during cell culture ageing and relations with somaclonal variation in Coffea arabica. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 122:517–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation a new source of variability from cell cultures for crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1983) Somaclonal variation and eyespot toxin tolerance in sugarcane. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 2:111–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Choo TM, Ho KM, Falk DE, Blatt R (2001) Barley somaclones associated with high yield or resistance to powdery mildew. Euphytica 121:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Deng Y, Ning Y, He Z, Wang GL (2020) Exploiting broad-spectrum disease resistance in crops: from molecular dissection to breeding. Annu Rev Plant Biol 71:575–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linacero R, Rueda J, Esquivel E, Bellido A, Domingo A, Vázquez AM (2011) Genetic and epigenetic relationship in rye, Secale cereale L., somaclonal variation within somatic embryo-derived plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 47:618–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Machczynska J, Zimny J, Bednarek PT (2015) Tissue culture-induced genetic and epigenetic variation in triticale (×Triticosecale spp. Wittmack ex A. Camus 1927) regenerants. Plant Mol Biol 89:279–292

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda P, Kaur A, Gosal SS (2018) Somaclonal variation for sugarcane improvement. In: Gosal SS, Wani SH (eds.), Biotechnologies of crop improvement, Springer, Cham, pp. 299–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Estrada E, Caamal-Velázquez JH, Salina Ruíz J, Bello-Bello JJ (2017) Assessment of somaclonal variation during sugarcane micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 53:553–560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masoabi M, Lloyd J, Kossmann J, van der Vyver C (2018) Ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis and in vitro polyethylene glycol selection for drought tolerance in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Sugar Tech 20:50–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM (2003) Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-salient stataistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 43:1235–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelakandan A, Wang K (2012) Recent progress in the understanding of tissue culture-induced genome level changes in plants and potential applications. Plant Cell Rep 31:597–620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nikam AA, Devarumath RM, Shitole MG, Ghole VS, Tawar PN, Suprasanna P (2014) Gamma radiation, in vitro selection for salt (NaCl) tolerance, and characterization of mutants in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 50:766–776

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noormohammadi Z, Habibollahi H, Farahani F, Sheidai M (2020) Molecular analysis of somaclonal variation in Linum usitatissimum and L. album. Plant. Gene 24:100261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS, Park JH, Kim SJ, Park YD (2020) Genome analysis of tissue culture-derived variations in regenerated Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis plants using next-generation sequencing. Horticult Environ Biotechnol 61:549–558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pastelin-Solano MC, Salinas-Ruíz J, González-Arnao MT, Castañeda-Castro O, Galindo-Tovar ME, Bello-Bello JJ (2019) Evaluation of in vitro shoot multiplication and ISSR marker based assessment of somaclonal variants at different subcultures of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia jacks). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 25:561–567

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Penna S, Vitthal SB, Yadav PV (2012) In-vitro mutagenesis and selection in plant tissue cultures and their prospects for crop improvement. Bioremediat Biodivers Bioavailab 6:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Phulwaria M, Rai MK, Shekhawat NS (2013) An improved micropropagation of Arnebia hispidissima (Lehm.) DC and assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants using DNA based molecular markers. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 170:1163–1173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan S, Singh SK, Srivastav M, Prakash J, Lal SK, Padaria JC, Goswami AK, Maurya NK (2021) Polyethylene glycol mediated in vitro screening and physico-biochemical changes induced in mango callus due to moisture stress. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 145:155–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01999-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai MK, Kalia RK, Singh R, Gangola MP, Dhawan AK (2011) Develo** stress tolerant plants through in vitro selection—an overview of the recent progress. Environ Exp Bot 71:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai MK, Phulwaria M, Harish, Gupta AK, Shekhawat NS, Jaiswal U (2012) Genetic homogeneity of guava plants derived from somatic embryogenesis using SSR and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 111:259–264

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai MK, Shekhawat NS (2014) Recent advances in genetic engineering for improvement of fruit crops. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 116:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Mosqueda MA, Iglesias-Andreu LG, da Silva JA, Luna-Rodríguez M, Noa-Carrazana JC, Bautista Aguilar JR, Ovalle L, Murguía González J (2019) In vitro selection of vanilla plants resistant to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vanillae. Acta Physiol Plant 41:40

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani V, Raina SN (2000) Genetic fidelity of organized meristem derived micropropagated plants: a critical reappraisal. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:319–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao R, Patil P (2012) In vitro selection of salt tolerant calli lines and regeneration of salt tolerant plantlets in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). In: Sammour R (ed) Biotechnology - molecular studies and novel applications for improved quality of human life. InTech, Rijeka, pp 197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao S, Jabeen FTZ (2013) In vitro selection and characterization of polyethylene glycol (PEG) tolerant callus lines and regeneration of plantlets from the selected callus lines in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 19:261–268

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rathore NS, Rai MK, Phulwaria M, Rathore N, Shekhawat NS (2014) Genetic stability in micropropagated Cleome gynandra revealed by SCoT analysis. Acta Physiol Plant 36:555–559

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regalado JJ, Carmona-Martín E, Moreno R, Gil J, Encina CL (2015) Study of the somaclonal variation produced by different methods of polyploidization with colchicine in Asparagus officinalis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 122:31–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remotti PC (1998) Somaclonal variation and in vitro selection for crop improvement. In: Jain SM, Brar DS, Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal variation and induced mutations in crop improvement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 169–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Rival A, Ilbert P, Labeyrie A, Torres E, Doulbeau S, Personne A, Dussert S, Beulé T, Durand-Gasselin T, Tregear JW, Jaligot E (2013) Variations in genomic DNA methylation during the long-term in vitro proliferation of oil palm embryogenic suspension cultures. Plant Cell Rep 32:359–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sahijram L (2015) Somaclonal variation in micropropagated plants. In: Bahadur B, Rajam MV, Sahijram L, Krishnamurthy KV (eds) Plant biology and biotechnology. Springer, New Delhi, pp 407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Kaur S, Kumar A (2020) In vitro drought tolerance in selected elite clones of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. Acta Physiol Plant 42:17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slazak B, Sliwinska E, Saługa M, Ronikier M, Bujak J, Słomka A, Göransson U, Kuta E (2015) Micropropagation of Viola uliginosa (Violaceae) for endangered species conservation and for somaclonal variation-enhanced cyclotide biosynthesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 120:179–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smulders M, de Klerk G (2011) Epigenetics in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul 63:137–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Springer NM, Schmitz RJ (2017) Exploiting induced and natural epigenetic variation for crop improvement. Nat Rev Genet 18:563–575

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasulu N, Sopory SK, Kavi-Kishor PB (2007) Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by genomic approaches. Gene 388:1–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suprasanna P, Meenakshi S, Bapat VA (2009) Integrated approaches of mutagenesis and in vitro selection for crop improvement. In: Kumar A, Shekhawat NS (eds) Plant tissue culture molecular markers and their role in crop productivity. IK International Publishers, New Delhi, pp 73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawar PN, Sawant RA, Sushir KV, Devarumath RM, Hapase RS, Meti NT (2016) VSI 434: new sugarcane variety obtained through somaclonal variation. Agric Res 5:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulk RW (1991) Application of cell and tissue culture and in vitro selection for disease resistance breeding-a review. Euphytica 56:269–285

    Google Scholar 

  • van Esse HP, Reuber TL, van der Does D (2020) Genetic modification to improve disease resistance in crops. New Phytol 225:70–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Zelm E, Zhang Y, Testerink C (2020) Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 71:403–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma D, Ansari MW, Agrawal GK, Rakwal R, Shukla A, Tuteja N (2013) In vitro selection and field responses of somaclonal variant plants of rice cv PS113 for drought tolerance. Plant Signal Behav 8:23519

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma S, Modgil M, Patidar S (2021) In vitro screening of apple rootstock MM106 somaclones with Phytophthora cactorum culture filtrate. J Plant Pathol 103:231–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiszniewska A, Hanus-Fajerska E, Smoleń S, Muszyńska E (2015) In vitro selection for lead tolerance in shoot culture of Daphne species. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus 14:129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerzhebayeva RS, Abekova AM, Bersimbaeva GH, Konysbekov KT, Bastaubaeva SO, Roik NV, Urazaliev KR (2019) In vitro cell selection of sugar beet for resistance to culture filtrate of the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Cytol Genet 53:307–314

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Manoj K. Rai

Authors
  1. Manoj K. Rai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj K. Rai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Dinesh Kumar Srivastava

  2. Biotechnology Division, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India

    Ajay Kumar Thakur

  3. Department of Biotechnology, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Pankaj Kumar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rai, M.K. (2021). Somaclonal Variation in Improvement of Agricultural Crops: Recent Progress. In: Kumar Srivastava, D., Kumar Thakur, A., Kumar, P. (eds) Agricultural Biotechnology: Latest Research and Trends . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2339-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation