Abstract
One of the prime goals of the automobile industry has been the reduction of the weight of the products. This helps in improving the performance of the vehicles. Lightweight vehicles have various advantages ranging from handling to safety. Lesser weight means lesser kinetic energy, due to which the crashworthiness of the vehicle improves. Topology optimization has been performed to extract the geometrical shape of the chassis from the control volume (design domain) for the chassis, whose dimensions are based on the existing two-wheeler chassis of the commuter segment in Indian motorcycling market. The work has focused on the designing of a chassis for an electric motorcycle by incorporating the battery pack space inside the chassis space. The objective has been to minimize the volume and maximize the stiffness with application of relevant geometric restrictions. The final geometrical shape has been used to build the roll-cage structure of the chassis. The work has proposed three models with 70, 80, and 90% volume reduction and the 90% weight reduction model has been used to build manufacturable chassis based on the topology optimization output.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lagaros ND (2014) A general purpose real-world structural design optimization computing platform. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49:1047–1066
Lagaros ND (2018) The environmental and economic impact of structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58:1751–1768
Gibson I, Rosen DW, Strucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies: rapid prototy** to direct digital. Springer, Boston
Barbieri SG, Giacopini M, Mangeruga V, Mantovani S (2017) A design strategy based on topology optimization techniques for an additive manufactured high performance engine piston. Proc Manuf 11:641–649
Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224
Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Opt 1:193–202
Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1992) DCOC—an optimality criteria method for large systems, Part I: theory. Struct Opt 5:12–25
Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Sethian JA, Wiegmann A (2000) Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. J Comput Phys 163(2):489–528
Wang MY, Wang XM, Guo DM (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:227–246
**e YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896
**e YM, Steven GP (1997) Evolutionary structural optimization. Springer, London
Rong JH, Tang ZL, **e YM, Li FY (2013) Topological optimization design of structures under random excitations using SQP method. Eng Struct 56:2098–2106
Kaveh A, Hassani B, Shojaee S, Tavakkoli SM (2008) Structural topology optimization using ant colony methodology. Eng Struct 30(9):2559–2565
Tovar A, Khandelwal K (2013) Topology optimization for minimum compliance using a control strategy. Eng Struct 48:674–682
Huang X, **e YM (2009) Bi-directional evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with one or multiple materials. Comput Mech 43(3):393–401
Huang X, Zuo ZH, **e YM (2010) Evolutionary topology optimization of vibrating continuum structures for natural frequencies. Comput Struct 88:357–364
Huang X, **e YM, Lu G (2007) Topology optimization of energy absorption structures. Int J Crashworthiness 12(6):663–675
Huang X, **e YM (2008) Topology optimization of nonlinear structures under displacement loading. Eng Struct 30(7):2057–2068
Ghabraie K, Chan R, Huang X, **e YM (2010) Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy. Eng Struct 32(8):2258–2267
Cavazzuti M, Baldini A, Bertocchi E, Costi D, Torricelli E, Moruzzi P (2011) High performance automotive chassis design: a topology optimization based approach. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0578-7
Cavazzuti M, Splendi L (2012) Structural optimization of automotive chassis: theory, set up, design. In: Conference on Problèmes Inverses, Contrôle et Optimisation de Formes 2012, Paris
Sudin M, Tahir M, Ramli F, Anuar Shamsuddin S (2014) Topology optimization in automotive brake pedal redesign. Int J Eng Technol 6:398–402
APWorks (2018) APWorks by Airbus Group, inspired by nature: electric motorcycle goes 3D—combining topology optimization, new materials, and additive manufacturing in the development of the Airbus APWorks light rider results in a revolutionary lightweight design. Altair. Available online at: https://altair-india.in/RelatedCaseStudy.aspx?id=8707
Stefanos EM, Lagaros ND, Nassiopoulos E (2019) Nested topology optimization methodology for designing two-wheel chassis front. Built Environ 5:34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00034
Cossalter V (2006) Motorcycle dynamics, 2nd edn, pp 119–122
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ahmad, M.I., Dorlikar, P. (2022). Chassis Design with Integrated Battery Pack Space for Electric Motorcycle. In: Bansal, R.C., Agarwal, A., Jadoun, V.K. (eds) Advances in Energy Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 766. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1476-7_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1476-7_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1475-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1476-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)