Structural Transformation in South Asia: An Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Structural Transformation of Bangladesh Economy

Abstract

The nature and dynamics of ST in South Asia are complex in which social, economic, and political processes are ingredients of both processes and outcomes. An important dimension is acute inequalities in all aspects of social and economic life. Universal access to basic services and equal opportunities for all are yet to become the cornerstones of the South Asia’s ST process. The challenge for the South Asian countries is to alter the sectoral share pattern towards manufacturing given its higher productivity and employment growth potentials compared with both agriculture and services. This is necessary to overcome the process of arrested and incomplete industrialisation. For South Asia, the key policy challenge is to achieve economic growth that is both inclusive and driven by productive ST.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The three-year sub-periods have been chosen mainly due to data limitations. For studying ST, Barro and Lee (1994) have used ten-year sub-periods, Levine et al. (2000) five-year sub-periods, while Islam (1995) 25- year period, and Karimu (2019) five-year sub-periods.

  2. 2.

    For example, compared with the 1966–1970 period, average yearly growth deceleration during 1971–1980 was as follows: 3.4 per cent to 1 per cent for Bangladesh; 4.6 per cent to 3.1 per cent for India; 2.6 per cent to 2.1 per cent for Nepal; 7.1 per cent to 4.7 per cent for Pakistan; and 5.8 per cent to 4.4 per cent for Sri Lanka. However, the growth rates started to rise in the 1980s and, in some cases, in the 1990s. Several authors describe the 1970s and 1980s for some South Asian countries as the ‘dismal’ or ‘lost’ decades for South Asia. See Mujeri and Sen, 2004; Osmani, 2009.

  3. 3.

    The unweighted protection rate declined from 73 per cent in 1991–92 to 28 per cent in 1995–96. See. Mahmud 2004.

  4. 4.

    At the international level, poverty measured at the international poverty line of $1.90 a day is used to monitor progress towards meeting the target of reducing the share of people living in extreme poverty to zero by 2030 of SDG1. See Ravallion, Chen, and Sangraula, 2008.

  5. 5.

    The multidimensional poverty index (MPI) shows both the incidence and the average intensity of their poverty. A person is identified as poor if he/she is deprived in at least one third of the weighted indicators. See OPHI/UNDP (2019).

  6. 6.

    Further, although South Asia is rapidly advancing towards a more prosperous future, the incremental wealth is accruing mostly to a small section of the population. In Nepal, during 1996 to 2011, the income share of the top quintile rose by almost five percentage points while the income share decreased for the rest four quintiles. In Pakistan, over the past 30 years, the bottom quintile has seen a decline in its share of national income while the top quintile experienced a steady increase. In India, the top 5 per cent earn as much as the remaining 95 per cent taken together. In 2017, 73 per cent of the created wealth has accrued to the richest 1 per cent. See Credit Suisse, 2017.

  7. 7.

    Over the two decades since the 1998 Asian financial crisis, nonperforming loan (NPL) ratios in Asia have generally been moving downward. Annual NPL ratios were less than 5 per cent for most countries, but bad loans as a share of the total outstanding rose to 49 per cent for Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Thailand; 29 per cent for China; and more than 10 per cent for India, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Philippines since 2010. The amount owed by corporate defaulters (net non-performing assets) to Indian banks was INR 4.44 trillion (USD 61.26 billion). See World Bank, World Development Indicators, https://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-developmentindicators.

  8. 8.

    An analogy can be drawn of a forest for the product space where each tree is considered as a product. Each firm operating in a product is like a monkey on a tree. The monkey can easily jump to nearby trees but not to far off ones. ‘Open forest’ is obtained as the weighted sum of PRODYs of products currently not exported, and the weights being the density of the country’s current export basket around each of these products. Open forest therefore refers to the product space that can potentially be exploited given their current location in the forest (dense areas or sparse ones). See Hidalgo et al., 2007.

References

  • Barro, R.J. 1996. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. Working Paper 5698. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. 2003. Determinants of Economic Growth in a Panel of Countries. Annals of Economics and Finance 4: 231–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., and J.-W. Lee. 1994. Sources of Economic Growth. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 40: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 1997. Technological Diffusion, Convergence and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 2 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 2004. Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R.E., L.H. Allen, Z.A. Bhutta, L.E. Caulfield, M. De Onis, M. Ezzati, and J. Rivera. 2008. Maternal and Child Undernutrition: Global and Regional Exposures and Health Consequences. Lancet 371: 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S.R., A. Hoeffler, and J. Temple. 2001. GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models. Discussion Paper 3048. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., and C. Morrisson. 2002. Inequality among World Citizens: 1820–1992. American Economic Review 92 (4): 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, F., G. Esquivel, and F. Lefort. 1996. Reopening the Convergence Debate: A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics. Journal of Economic Growth 1 (3): 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, M.D., and H. Ito. 2006. What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81 (1): 163–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, M.D., and H. Ito. 2008. A New Measure of Financial Openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10 (3): 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobham, A., and P. Janský. 2017. Global Distribution of Revenue Loss from Tax Avoidance: Re-Estimation and Country Results, WIDER Working Paper 2017/55. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Credit Suisse. 2017. Global Wealth Report 2017. Geneva: Credit Suisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan, S. 2005. South Asian Surprises. Economic and Political Weekly 40 (37): 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundar, H., T. Béteille, M. Riboud, and A. Deolalikar. 2014. Student Learning in South Asia: Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy Priorities. World Bank, Washington, DC: Directions in Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, C. 2000. Non-Homothetic Preferences and Growth. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 9 (2): 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC, 2001. Question of the Realization in All Countries of the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 04/06/20001.E/DEC/2001/220. UN Economic and Social Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD and WFP, . 2014. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2014: Strengthening the Enabling Environment for Food Security and Nutrition. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, . 2018. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018. Rome: Geneva and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. 2008. Labour Productivity Indicators: Comparison of Two OECD Databases. Division of Structural Economics Statistics, OECD Statistics Directorate, Paris: Productivity Differentials and The Balassa-Samuelson Effect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., and B. Klinger. 2006. Structural Transformation and Patterns of Comparative Advantage in the Product Space, Center for International Development Working Paper No. 128. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., and B. Klinger. 2007. The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage, Center for International Development Working Paper No. 146. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., J. Hwang, and D. Rodrik. 2007. What You Export Matters. Journal of Economic Growth 12 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C., and R. Hausmann. 2009. The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (26): 10570–10575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C.A., et al. 2007. The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science 317 (5837): 482–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, P (2016), Assessing the Gender Pay Gap in Asia’s Garment Industry, ILO Asia - Pacific Working Paper Series. Bangkok: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGC. 2010. Economic Growth and Structural Change in South Asia: Miracle or Mirage? Working Paper 10/0859. London: International Growth Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2010. Studies on Growth with Equity: Bangladesh Seeking Better Employment Condition For Better Socioeconomic Outcome. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2015. Global Wage Report 2014/15: Wages and Income Inequality. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2018. Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture, 3rd ed. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2019. Labour Statistics. Available at: https://ilostat.ilo.org/data.

  • IMF. 2019. Estimating the Stock of Public Capital in 170 Countries. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/publicinvestment/pdf/csupdate_aug19.pdf.

  • Islam, N. 1995. Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (4): 1127–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimu, S. 2019. Structural Transformation, Openness, and Productivity Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. WIDER Working Paper 2019/109. Helsinki: United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. 1971. Economic Growth of Nations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. 1973. Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections. American Economic Review 63 (3): 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R., N. Loayza, and T. Beck. 2000. Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes. Journal of Monetary Economics 46: 31–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. 2010. New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development, Policy Research Working Paper No. 5197. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, W. 2004. Macroeconomic Management: From Stabilisation to Growth? Economic and Political Weekly, 4 September: 4023–4032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, J. 2017. Structural Change and Productivity Growth in India and the People's Republic of China. ADBI Working Paper No. 656, Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, M., D. Rodrik, and Í. Verduzco-Gallo. 2014. Globalization, Structural Change, and Productivity Growth, with an Update on Africa. World Development 63: 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moral-Benito, E., P.D. Allison, and R. Williams. 2019. Dynamic Panel Data Modeling using Maximum Likelihood: An Alternative to Arellano-Bond. Applied Economics 51 (20): 2221–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujeri, M.K., and N. Mujeri. Forthcoming. Bangladesh at Fifty: Moving beyond Development Surprises. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, J. 1981. Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OPHI, UNDP, . 2019. Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2019: Illuminating Inequalities. New York and Oxford: United Nations Development Programme and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmani, S.R. 2009. Explaining Growth in South Asia. In Diversity in Economic Growth: Global Insights and Explanations, eds. G. McMahon, H. Esfahani and L. Squire. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rama, M., T. Béteille, Y. Li, P.K. Mitra, and J.L. Newman. 2015. Addressing Inequality in South Asia: South Asia Development Matters. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., S. Chen, and P. Sangraula. 2008. Dollar a Day Revisited. Policy Research Working Paper 4620. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2016. Premature Deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth 21 (1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. 2009. How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal. 9(1): 86-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, P.V. 2013. Dynamics of structural transformation in South Asia. Asia-Pacific Development Journal. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 20(2): 53–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syrquin, M. 1988. Patterns of Structural Change. In Handbook of Development Economics, 1, eds. H. Chenery and T.N. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, M.P., A.A. Erumbana, B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G. de Vries. 2012a. New Measures of European Competitiveness: A Global Value Chain Perspective. Background paper for the WIOD project presentation at the high-level conference on. Competitiveness, trade, environment and jobs in Europe: Insights from the new World Input Output Database (WIOD), European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, P., M. Margaret, O. Badiane, D. Rodrik, H. Binswanger-Mkhize, and F. Wouterse. 2012. Patterns of Growth and Structural Transformation in Africa: Trends and Lessons for Future Development Strategies. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Statistics Division. 2019. National Accounts—Analysis of Main Aggregates (AMA). Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Index.

  • UNCTAD. 2014. Growth with Structural Transformation: A Post-2015 Development Agenda, The Least Developed Countries Report 2014. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2017. The Role of the Services Economy and Trade in Structural Transformation and Inclusive Development. UNCTAD, Geneva: Note by the UNCTAD Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO & UNICEF. 2017. Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: 2017 Update and SDG Baselines. Geneva and New York: World Health Organisation and United Nations Children Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. 2018. World Health Statistics 2018: Monitoring Health for the SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., P. Allison, and E. Moral-Benito. 2018. Linear Dynamic Panel-Data Estimation using Maximum Likelihood and Structural Equation Modeling. Stata Journal 18 (2): 293–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2008. Poverty Assessment for Bangladesh: Creating Opportunities and Bridging the East-West Divide. Bangladesh Development Series, Paper No. 26, Poverty Reduction, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit, South Asia Region. Dhaka: World Bank Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2019. Featured Indicators: Agriculture and Rural Development. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa K. Mujeri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mujeri, M.K., Mujeri, N. (2021). Structural Transformation in South Asia: An Overview. In: Structural Transformation of Bangladesh Economy. South Asia Economic and Policy Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0764-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation