Quantifying and Integrating Co-benefits of Renewable Energy Policies in South Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aligning Climate Change and Sustainable Development Policies in Asia

Abstract

Recently, South Korea announced it would make efforts to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. Korea already has been working to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions with diverse policies and measures in many sectors. However, climate change is not the only environmental issue that is a concern for South Korea. Annual average PM2.5 concentrations were 23μg/m3 in 2018 and 2019 (National Institute of Environmental Research 2020). National emission standards for PM2.5 have been exeeded over 50 times in 2018 and 2019. It is expected that annual premature mortality associated with PM2.5 will be the highest among Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries (OECD 2017). The South Korean government has to deal with these two serious environmental and health risks like many other countries. Co-control policies to reduce PM2.5 and GHGs simultaneously therefore have become a priority for South Korea. Carefully designed co-control and co-benefit policies would help to resolve these problems in more cost-efficive manner. Policies that promote renewable energy have the potential to deliver these co-benefits. Increasing the share of renewable energy to replace coal-fired power generation is included in both South Korea’s Amendment to the Roadmap for the National GHG Reduction for 2030 and the Comprehensive Plan on Fine Dust Management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The full CTM approach to analyze the change of the ambient concentration needs running a CTM model for each case. However, it requires enough in terms of expertise, time, and resources (Gilmore et al. 2019).

  2. 2.

    We finally used the value of KRW 3 billion derived through the benefit-transfer method.

References

  • Ahn CY et al (2018) Estimation of social costs of air pollutants. KEI Focus 7(6):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimanchev EG, Paltsev S, Yuan M, Rothenberg D, Tessum CW, Marshall JD, Selin NE (2019) Health co-benefits of sub-national renewable energy policy in the US. Environ Res Lett 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab31d9

  • EPA (2018) Quantifying the multiple benefits of energy efficiency and renewable energy: a guide for state and local governments 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Peltier H (2017) Green versus brown: comparing the employment impacts of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fossil fuels using an input-output model. Econ Model 61:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore EA, Heo J, Muller NZ, Tessum CW, Hill JD, Marshall JD, Adams PJ (2019) An inter-comparison of the social costs of air quality from reduced-complexity models. Environ Res Lett 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1ab5

  • Hoek G, Krishnan RM, Beelen R, Peters A, Ostro B, Brunekreef B, Kaufman JD (2013) Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio- respiratory mortality: a review. Environ Health 12:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2018) World Energy Outlook 2018. Int. Energy Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2019) Renewables 2019: Analysis and forecast to 2024. Int. Energy Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2020a) World Energy Outlook 2020. Int. Energy Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2020b) Sustainable recovery: world energy outlook special report. World Energy Outlook 185

    Google Scholar 

  • IQAir (2019) World Air Quality Report. 2019 World Air Qual Rep 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • IRENA (2018) Global energy transformation: a roadmap to 2050, global energy transformation. A Roadmap to 2050

    Google Scholar 

  • IRENA (2019) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • IRENA (2020) Measuring the socio-economics of transition: Focus on jobs, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhab

    Google Scholar 

  • IWG (2016) Technical Support Document:-Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis-Under Executive Order 12866

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee GD, Park MD, Jeon YJ, Shin HC, Yang JH, Kim YK, Park HJ (2018) “A study on estimation of levelized cost of electricity by source” in Korean

    Google Scholar 

  • Luderer G, Pehl M, Arvesen A, Gibon T, Bodirsky BL, de Boer HS, Fricko O, Hejazi M, Humpenöder F, Iyer G, Mima S, Mouratiadou I, Pietzcker RC, Popp A, van den Berg M, van Vuuren D, Hertwich EG (2019) Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies. Nat Commun 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13067-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MoE (2019) Comprehensive plan on fine dust management

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller NZ, Mendelsohn R (2006) The air pollution emission experiments and policy analysis model (APEEP)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Environmental Research (2020) Annual report of air quality in Korea 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017) OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Korea 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2020) Making the Green Recovery work for jobs, income and growth. OECD, Paris, pp 21–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeora Chae .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jeon, HC., Kim, Y.J., Chae, Y. (2021). Quantifying and Integrating Co-benefits of Renewable Energy Policies in South Korea. In: Farzaneh, H., Zusman, E., Chae, Y. (eds) Aligning Climate Change and Sustainable Development Policies in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0135-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation