Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dam-Reservoir-Foundation Systems to Near-Fault Ground Motions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seismic Performance Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams

Part of the book series: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China ((ATSTC,volume 57))

  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

As the forward directivity and fling effect characteristics of the near-fault ground motions, seismic response of structures in the near field of a rupturing fault can be significantly different from those observed in the far field. The unique characteristics of the near-fault ground motions can cause considerable damage during an earthquake. This chapter presents results of a study aimed at evaluating the near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams including dam-reservoir-foundation interaction. Nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage analyses of concrete gravity dams subjected to both near-fault and far-fault ground motions are performed. The results obtained from the analyses of the dam subjected to each fault effect are compared with each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamson, N. A., & Somerville, P. G. (1996). Effects of the hanging wall and footwall on ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86S(1B), S93–S99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akköse, M., & ÅžimÅŸek, E. (2010). Non-linear seismic response of concrete gravity dams to near-fault ground motions including dam-water-sediment-foundation interaction. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(11), 3685–3700.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ardakani, S. M. S., & Saiidi, M. S. (2018). Simple method to estimate residual displacement in concrete bridge columns under near-fault earthquake motions. Engineering Structures, 176, 208–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar, A., AltuniAik, A. C., Sevim, B. A., Kartal, M. E., Turker, T., & Bilici, Y. (2009). Comparison of near-and far-fault ground motion effect on the nonlinear response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 58(4), 655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar, A., Türker, T., Akk Se, M., & Ate, E. (2010). The effect of reservoir length on seismic performance of gravity dams to near-and far-fault ground motions. Natural Hazards, 52(2), 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behesthi Aval, S. B., Mohsenian, V., & Sadegh Kouhestani, H. (2018). Seismic performance-based assessment of tunnel form building subjected to near- and far-fault ground motions. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beiraghi, H., Kheyroddin, A., & Kafi, M. A. (2016a). Forward directivity near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on the behavior of reinforced concrete wall tall buildings with one and more plastic hinges. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 25(11), 519–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beiraghi, H., Kheyroddin, A., & Kafi, M. A. (2016b). Energy dissipation of tall core-wall structures with multi-plastic hinges subjected to forward directivity near-fault and far-fault earthquakes. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 25(15), 801–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., Wijeyewickrema, A. C., & Subedi, N. (2018). Influence of near-fault ground motions with fling-step and forward-directivity characteristics on seismic response of base-isolated buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, H., & Hysenlliu, M. (2020). Comparison of near and far-fault ground motion effects on low and mid-rise masonry buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 30, 101248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. D., & Rodriguez-Marek, A. (2004). Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(11), 815–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., Meza-Fajardo, K. C., Mavroeidis, G. P., & Papageorgiou, A. S. (2016). Effects of wave passage on torsional response of symmetric buildings subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 88, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, B., & Yang, D. (2020). Seismic response analysis of intake tower structure under near-fault ground motions with forward-directivity and fling-step effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 132, 106098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, A. K., & Chintanapakdee, C. (2001). Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(12), 1769–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSMOS. 2019. Strong Motion Virtual Data Center. http://strongmotioncenter.org/vdc/scripts/default.plx.

  • Du, K., Cheng, F., Bai, J., & **, S. (2020). Seismic performance quantification of buckling-restrained braced RC frame structures under near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslami, A., Ronagh, H. R., & Mostofinejad, D. (2016). Analytical assessment of CFRP retrofitted reinforced-concrete buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(6), 4016044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanaat, Y. (2002). Seismic performance and damage criteria for concrete dams. In Proceedings of the 3rd US-Japan Workshop on Advanced Research on Earthquake Engineering for Dams, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanaat, Y. (2004). Failure modes approach to safety evaluation of dams. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorai, S., & Maity, D. (2019). Seismic response of concrete gravity dams under near field and far field ground motions. Engineering Structures, 196, 109292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayati Dezfuli, F., Li, S., Alam, M. S., & Wang, J. (2017). Effect of constitutive models on the seismic response of an SMA-LRB isolated highway bridge. Engineering Structures, 148, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, M. R., Billah, A. H. M. M., & Alam, M. S. (2019). Seismic fragility assessment of a multi-span RC bridge in Bangladesh considering near-fault, far-field and long duration ground motions. Structures, 19, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstandakopoulou, F. D., Evangelinos, K. I., Nikolaou, I. E., Papagiannopoulos, G. A., & Pnevmatikos, N. G. (2019). Seismic analysis of offshore platforms subjected to pulse-type ground motions compatible with European Standards. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 105713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Zhang, F., Wang, J., Alam, M. S., & Zhang, J. (2017). Seismic responses of super-span cable-stayed bridges induced by ground motions in different sites relative to fault rupture considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 101, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, W., Loh, C., & Lee, B. (2004). Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures, 26(14), 2173–2183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H., Zhuo, W., Lavorato, D., Nuti, C., Fiorentino, G., Gu, Y., et al. (2019). Probabilistic seismic response analysis on continuous bridges under near-fault ground motions. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 43(3), 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manafpour, A. R., & Kamrani Moghaddam, P. (2019). Performance capacity of damaged RC SDOF systems under multiple far- and near-field earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavroeidis, G. P., & Papageorgiou, A. S. (2003). A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(3), 1099–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEER. (2019). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database/.

  • Raphael, J. M. (1984). Tensile strength of concrete. ACI Journal Proceedings 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevim, B. (2011). The effect of material properties on the seismic performance of Arch Dams. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 11(8), 2253–2261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. (2005). Engineering characterization of near fault ground motions. In New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. G. (2003). Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 137(1–4), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. G., Smith, N. F., Graves, R. W., & Abrahamson, N. A. (1997). Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. P., Chiou, S., Bray, J. D., Graves, R. W., Somerville, P. G., & Abrahamson, N. A. (2002). Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9), 765–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, B., Zhang, S., Deng, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Inelastic dynamic response and fragility analysis of arched hydraulic tunnels under as-recorded far-fault and near-fault ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 132, 106070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajammolian, H., Khoshnoudian, F., & Mehr, N. P. (2016). Seismic responses of isolated structures with mass asymmetry mounted on TCFP subjected to near-fault ground motions. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(8A), 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USACE. (2003). Time history dynamic analysis of concrete hydraulic structures. Engineer Manual Em 1110-2-6051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. Q., Zhou, X. Y., Zhang, P. Z., & Igel, H. (2002). Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **ang, N., & Alam, M. S. (2019). Displacement-based seismic design of bridge bents retrofitted with various bracing devices and their seismic fragility assessment under near-fault and far-field ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 119, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **n, L., Li, X., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, L. (2019). Seismic behavior of long-span concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge subjected to near-fault fling-step motions. Engineering Structures, 180, 148–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, Y., Hall, R., Sasaki, T., Matheu, E., Kanenawa, K., Chudgar, A., & Yule, D. (2004). Seismic performance evaluation of concrete gravity dams. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Guo, G., Liu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2019). Dimensional response analysis of bilinear SDOF systems under near-fault ground motions with intrinsic length scale. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Mavroeidis, G. P., Ucak, A., & Tsopelas, P. (2017). Effect of ground motion filtering on the dynamic response of a seismically isolated bridge with and without fault crossing considerations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani, Y., & Alembagheri, M. (2017a). Seismic vulnerability of gravity dams in near-fault areas. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 102, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani, Y., & Alembagheri, M. (2017b). Nonlinear seismic response of a gravity dam under near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, D., Han, H., Ling, H. I., Zhou, Y., & Liu, J. (2019). An approach for the real-time slip deformation coupled with strain softening of a high rockfill dam subjected to pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 117, 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaohui Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Zhejiang University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, G., Lu, W., Zhang, S. (2021). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dam-Reservoir-Foundation Systems to Near-Fault Ground Motions. In: Seismic Performance Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China, vol 57. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6194-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6194-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6193-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6194-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation