SpringerLink
Log in

A Brief Review of Robotics Technologies to Support Social Interventions for Older Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Centred Intelligent Systems

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 189))

  • 904 Accesses

Abstract

In the last few decades, various studies demonstrated numerous robotics applications that can tackle the problem of the aging population by supporting older people to live longer and independently at home. This article reviews the scientific literature and highlights how social robots can help the daily life of older people, and be useful also as assessment tools for mild physical and mental conditions. It will underline the aspects of usability and acceptability of robotic solutions for older persons. Indeed, the design should maximize these to improve the users’ attitude toward the actual use of the robots. The article discusses the advantages and concerns about the use of robotics technology in the social context with a vulnerable population. In this field, success is to assist social workers, not to replace them. We conclude recommending that care benefits should be balanced against ethical costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper, C., Dogramadzi, S., Tokhi, M.O.: Developments in vocabulary standardization for robots and robotic devices. In: Mobile Robotics: Solutions and Challenges, pp. 155–162. World Scientific (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Siciliano, B., Khatib, O.: Springer handbook of robotics. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Cangelosi, A., Di Nuovo, A.: Lateral specialization in unilateral spatial neglect: a cognitive robotics model. Cogn. Process. 17, 321–328 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0761-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Nuovo, A., McClelland, J.L.: Develo** the knowledge of number digits in a child-like robot. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 594–605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0123-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Nuovo, A., Jay, T.: Development of numerical cognition in children and artificial systems: a review of the current knowledge and proposals for multi-disciplinary research. Cogn. Comput. Syst. 1, 2–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/ccs.2018.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavallo, F., Esposito, R., Limosani, R., Manzi, A., Bevilacqua, R., Felici, E., Di Nuovo, A., Cangelosi, A., Lattanzio, F., Dario, P.: Robotic services acceptance in smart environments with older adults: user satisfaction and acceptability study. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e264 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matarić, M.J.: Socially assistive robotics: human augmentation versus automation. Sci. Robot. 2, eaam5410 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood, L.J., Zaraki, A., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K.: Develo** kaspar: a humanoid robot for children with autism. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00563-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, N., Di Nuovo, A., Cangelosi, A., Jones, R.: Temporal patterns in multi-modal social interaction between elderly users and service robot. Interact. Stud. 20, 4–24 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Conti, D., Cattani, A., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A.: Are Future Psychologists Willing to Accept and Use a Humanoid Robot in Their Practice? Italian and English Students’ Perspective. Front. Psychol. 10, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowling, A.: Quality of life: Measures and meanings in social care research. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pedersen, I., Reid, S., Aspevig, K.: Develo** social robots for aging populations: a literature review of recent academic sources. Soc. Compass. 12, e12585 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3, eaat5954 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Conti, D., Cirasa, C., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A.: “Robot, tell me a tale!”: a social robot as tool for teachers in kindergarten. Interact. Stud. 21, 221–243 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Allen, M.: Alexa, Can You Support People With Care Needs? (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prescott, T.J., Caleb-Solly, P.: Robotics in social care: a connected care EcoSystem for independent living (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf. Technol. 14, 27–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B.-J., Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., Lucivero, F.: Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innov. Technol. 9, 1–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1304921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Draper, H., Sorell, T.: Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19, 49–68 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krägeloh, C.U., Bharatharaj, J., Kutty, S., Kumar, S., Nirmala, P.R., Huang, L.: Questionnaires to measure acceptability of social robots: a critical review. Robotics 8, 88 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Charisi, V., Davison, D., Reidsma, D., Evers, V.: Evaluation methods for user-centered child-robot interaction. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 545–550. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Savela, N., Turja, T., Oksanen, A.: Social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10, 493–502 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Busch, B., Maeda, G., Mollard, Y., Demangeat, M., Lopes, M.: Postural optimization for an ergonomic human-robot interaction. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2778–2785. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salvini, P., Laschi, C., Dario, P.: Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 451–460 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nam, T.: Citizen attitudes about job replacement by robotic automation. Futures 109, 39–49 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stafford, R.Q., MacDonald, B.A., Jayawardena, C., Wegner, D.M., Broadbent, E.: Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 17–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heerink, M., Albo-Canals, J., Valenti-Soler, M., Martinez-Martin, P., Zondag, J., Smits, C., Anisuzzaman, S.: Exploring requirements and alternative pet robots for robot assisted therapy with older adults with dementia. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 104–115. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, Y., Wrobel, J., Cornuet, M., Kerhervé, H., Damnée, S., Rigaud, A.-S.: Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting. Clin. Interv. Aging 9, 801 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jung, J., Song, H., Kim, Y., Im, H., Oh, S.: Intrusion of software robots into journalism: the public’s and journalists’ perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 291–298 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Suprem, A., Mahalik, N., Kim, K.: A review on application of technology systems, standards and interfaces for agriculture and food sector. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 35, 355–364 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marchant, G., Allenby, B., Arkin, R., Barrett, E., Borenstein, J., Gaudet, L., Kittrie, O., Lin, P., Lucas, G., O’Meara, R.: International governance of autonomous military robots’. Columbia Sci. Technol. Law Rev. 12, 272 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Palep, J.H.: Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery. J. Minimal Access Surg. 5, 1 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mubin, O., Stevens, C.J., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A. Al, Dong, J.-J.: A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technol. Educ. Learn. 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Di Nuovo, A., Conti, D., Trubia, G., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, S.: Deep learning systems for estimating visual attention in robot-assisted therapy of children with autism and intellectual disability. Robotics 7, 25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics7020025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Conti, D., Trubia, G., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A.: Evaluation of a robot-assisted therapy for children with autism and intellectual disability. In: Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, pp. 405–415. Springer (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96728-8_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., Marrs, A.: Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute San Francisco, CA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.A.: The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 114, 254–280 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Commission, European: Special Eurobarometer 382-Public Attitudes Towards Robots. Belgium, Brussels (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Osada, T., Haikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H.: Analysis of humanoid appearances in human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans. Robot. 24, 725–735 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, A.: Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: a study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 51–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0359-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Conti, D., Commodari, E., Buono, S.: Personality factors and acceptability of socially assistive robotics in teachers with and without specialized training for children with disability. Life Span Disabil. 20, 251–272 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rossi, S., Santangelo, G., Staffa, M., Varrasi, S., Conti, D., Di Nuovo, A.: Psychometric evaluation supported by a social robot: personality factors and technology acceptance. In: 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 802–807. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 319–330 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Commission, European: Special Eurobarometer 460-Attitudes Towards the Impact of Digitisation and Automation on Daily Life. Belgium, Brussels (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Taipale, S., de Luca, F., Sarrica, M., Fortunati, L.: Robot shift from industrial production to social reproduction. In: Social Robots from a Human Perspective, pp. 11–24. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Takayama, L., Ju, W., Nass, C.: Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do. In: 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 25–32. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Isle of Wight Council: Social Care Digital Innovation Programme. Discovery phase report for exploring the potential for Cobots to support carers (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shishehgar, M., Kerr, D., Blake, J.: A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people. Smart Health. 7, 1–18 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Steptoe, A., Shankar, A., Demakakos, P., Wardle, J.: Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 5797–5801 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Di Nuovo, A., Broz, F., Wang, N., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., Jones, R., Esposito, R., Cavallo, F., Dario, P.: The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly. Intel. Serv. Robot. 11, 109–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-017-0237-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Loutfi, A.: A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2013, 3 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Li, J.: The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 77, 23–37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Kerse, N., Broadbent, E.: The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 14, 661–667 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fasola, J., Matarić, M.J.: A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 2, 3–32 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen, T.L., Bhattacharjee, T., Beer, J.M., Ting, L.H., Hackney, M.E., Rogers, W.A., Kemp, C.C.: Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise. PLoS ONE 12, e0182736 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Prakash, A., Rogers, W.A.: Why some humanoid faces are perceived more positively than others: effects of human-likeness and task. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 309–331 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry. 189, 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., Evers, V.: Of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users Categories and Subject Descriptors. People Comput. 430–439 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1163/016918609X12518783330289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Robot-Era project. http://www.robot-era.eu/robotera/

  62. Varrasi, S., Di Nuovo, S., Conti, D., Di Nuovo, A.: A social robot for cognitive assessment. In: HRI’18 Companion: Conference on ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 5–8 March 2018, pp. 269–270. Chicago, IL, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176995

  63. Di Nuovo, A., Varrasi, S., Lucas, A., Conti, D., McNamara, J., Soranzo, A.: Assessment of cognitive skills via human-robot interaction and cloud computing. J. Bionic Eng. 16, 526–539 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Varrasi, S., Lucas, A., Soranzo, A., McNamara, J., Di Nuovo, A.: IBM cloud services enhance automatic cognitive assessment via human-robot interaction. In: Carbone, G., Ceccarelli, M., Pisla, D. (eds.) New Trends in Medical and Service Robotics, pp. 169–176. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Dahl, T., Boulos, M.: Robots in health and social care: a complementary technology to home care and telehealthcare? Robotics 3, 1–21 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hudson, J., Orviska, M., Hunady, J.: People’s attitudes to robots in caring for the elderly. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 199–210 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Baisch, S., Kolling, T., Schall, A., Rühl, S., Selic, S., Kim, Z., Rossberg, H., Klein, B., Pantel, J., Oswald, F.: Acceptance of social robots by elder people: does psychosocial functioning matter? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 293–307 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mori, M.: Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy, 7(4) 33–35. (Translated by Karl F. MacDorman and Takashi Minato in 2005) within Appendix B for the paper Androids as an Experimental Apparatus: Why is there an uncanny and can we exploit it? In: Proceedings of the CogSci-2005 Workshop: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 106–118 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Strait, M.K., Floerke, V.A., Ju, W., Maddox, K., Remedios, J.D., Jung, M.F., Urry, H.L.: Understanding the uncanny: both atypical features and category ambiguity provoke aversion toward humanlike robots. Front. Psychol. 8, 1366 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sheffield Robotics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK

    Daniela Conti & Alessandro Di Nuovo

  2. University of Catania, Via Teatro Greco 84, 95124, Catania, Italy

    Santo Di Nuovo

Authors
  1. Daniela Conti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Santo Di Nuovo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandro Di Nuovo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Conti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Informatics, Reutlingen University, Reutlingen, Baden-WĂĽrttemberg, Germany

    Alfred Zimmermann

  2. KES International and Bournemouth University, Shoreham-by-sea, UK

    Robert J. Howlett

  3. University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A. (2021). A Brief Review of Robotics Technologies to Support Social Interventions for Older Users. In: Zimmermann, A., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Human Centred Intelligent Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 189. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation