Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation in Data Centers Using a Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Machine Learning for Intelligent Decision Science

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Abstract

Energy efficient scheduling in a cloud data center aims at effectively utilizing available resources and improving the energy utilization. Resource scheduling is NP-hard and often requires substantial computational resources. This chapter presents an interactive PSO-GA algorithm that performs parallel processing of particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) using multi-threading and shared memory for information exchange to enhance convergence time and global exploration. With the proposed approach, this chapter demonstrates an efficient virtual machine placement in a data center that greatly reduces the total energy consumption up to 34% and the convergence time up to 50% compared to PSO, GA, and modified best-fit decreasing approaches. Further, this method achieves average parallel efficiency of 90% and a speed up of 1.5. This chapter also evaluates effectiveness of the proposed algorithm on benchmark optimization test problems over the state-of-the art algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 128.39
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, Lee G, Patterson D, Rabkin A, Stoica I (2010) A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM, 53(4):50–58

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buyya R, Yeo CS, Venugopal S, Broberg J, Brandic I (2009) Cloud computing and emerging it platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Futur Gener Comput Syst 25(6):599–616

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Q, Cheng L, Boutaba R (2010) Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges. J Internet Serv Appl 1(1):7–18

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao H, Wang J, Liu F, Wang Q, Zhang W, Zheng Q (2018) Power-aware and performance-guaranteed virtual machine placement in the cloud. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 29(6):1385–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu X-F, Zhan Z-H, Deng JD, Li Y, Gu T, Zhang J (2018) An energy efficient ant colony system for virtual machine placement in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 22(1):113–128

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li X-K, Gu C-H, Yang Z-P, Chang Y-H (2015 ) Virtual machine placement strategy based on discrete firefly algorithm in cloud environments. In: 2015 12th international computer conference on Wavelet active media technology and information processing (ICCWAMTIP). IEEE, pp 61–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pal SK, Rai CS, Singh AP (2012) Comparative study of firefly algorithm and particle swarm optimization for noisy non-linear optimization problems. Int J Intell Syst Appl 4(10):50

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jatoth C, Gangadharan GR, Buyya R (2015) Computational intelligence based qos-aware web service composition: a systematic literature review. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 10(3):475–492

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson DS (1982) The NP-completeness column: an ongoing guide. J Algorithms 3(2):182–195

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmanis J (1982) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness (michael r. garey and david s. johnson). Siam Rev 24(1):90

    Google Scholar 

  11. Portaluri G, Adami D, Gabbrielli A, Giordano S, Pagano M (2017) Power consumption-aware virtual machine placement in cloud data center. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw 1(4):541–550

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee S, Panigrahy R, Prabhakaran V, Ramasubramanian V, Talwar K, Uyeda L, Wieder U (2011) Validating heuristics for virtual machines consolidation. Microsoft Research, MSR-TR-2011-9, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y, **a Y (2016) Energy optimal vm placement in the cloud. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 9th international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD). IEEE, pp 84–91

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sayadnavrad MH, Haghighat AT, Rahmani AM (2018) A reliable energy-aware approach for dynamic virtual machine consolidation in cloud data centers. J Supercomput 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw R, Howley E, Barrett E (2019) An energy efficient anti-correlated virtual machine placement algorithm using resource usage predictions. Simul Model Pract Theory

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael R. Garey, David S. Johnson (1990) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vomlelova M, Vomlel J (2003) Troubleshooting: NP-hardness and solution methods. Soft Comput 7(5):357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu G, Tang M, Tian Y-C, Li W (2012) Energy-efficient virtual machine placement in data centers by genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of international conference on neural information processing. Springer, pp 315–323

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seyed Ebrahim Dashti and Amir Masoud Rahmani (2016) Dynamic VMs placement for energy efficiency by PSO in cloud computing. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 28(2):97–112

    Google Scholar 

  20. Das H, Naik B, Behera HS (2019) Medical disease analysis using neuro-fuzzy with feature extraction model for classification. Inform Med Unlocked 100288

    Google Scholar 

  21. Das H, Naik B, Behera HS (2018) Classification of diabetes mellitus disease (dmd): a data mining (dm) approach. In: Progress in computing, analytics and networking. Springer, pp 539–549

    Google Scholar 

  22. Das H, Jena Ak, Nayak J, Naik B, Behera HS (2015) A novel pso based back propagation learning-mlp (pso-bp-mlp) for classification. In: Computational intelligence in data mining, vol 2 Springer, pp 461–471

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dey N, Ashour AS, Kalia H, Goswami R, Das H (2019) Histopathological image analysis in medical decision making

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sahoo AK, Mallik S, Pradhan C, Mishra BSP, Barik RK, Das H (2019) Intelligence-based health recommendation system using big data analytics. In: Big data analytics for intelligent healthcare management. Elsevier, pp 227–246

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rout M, Jena AK, Rout JK, Das H (2020) Teaching–learning optimization based cascaded low-complexity neural network model for exchange rates forecasting. In: Smart intelligent computing and applications. Springer, pp 635–645

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mohanty S, Moharana SC, Das H, Satpathy SC (2020) Qos aware group-based workload scheduling in cloud environment. In: Data engineering and communication technology. Springer, pp 953–960

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gharehpasha S, Masdari M, Jafarian A (2019) The placement of virtual machines under optimal conditions in cloud datacenter. Inf Technol Control 48(4):545–556

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grange L, Da Costa G, Stolf P (2018) Green it scheduling for data center powered with renewable energy. Futur Gener Comput Syst 86:99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta MK, Amgoth T (2018) Resource-aware virtual machine placement algorithm for iaas cloud. J Supercomput 74(1):122–140

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li Z, Li Y, Yuan T, Chen S, Jiang S (2019) Chemical reaction optimization for virtual machine placement in cloud computing. Appl Intell 49(1):220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gandelli A, Grimaccia F, Mussetta M, Pirinoli P, Zich RE (2007) Development and validation of different hybridization strategies between GA and PSO. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, pp 2782–2787

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kao Y-T, Zahara E (2008) A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions. Appl Soft Comput 8(2):849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Esmin AAA, Lambert-Torres G, Alvarenga GB (2006) Hybrid evolutionary algorithm based on PSO and GA mutation. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on hybrid intelligent systems. IEEE, pp 57–57

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shi XH, Liang YC, Lee HP, Lu C, Wang LM (2005) An improved ga and a novel PSO-GA-based hybrid algorithm. Inf Process Lett 93(5):255–261

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. GáLvez A, Iglesias AS (2013) A new iterative mutually coupled hybrid GA-PSO approach for curve fitting in manufacturing. Appl Soft Comput 13(3):1491–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shi XH, Lu YH, Zhou CG, Lee HP, Lin WZ, Liang YC (2003) Hybrid evolutionary algorithms based on pso and ga. In: Proceedings of the congress on evolutionary computation, CEC’03., vol 4. IEEE, pp 2393–2399

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kennedy J (1997) The particle swarm: social adaptation of knowledge. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE, pp 303–308

    Google Scholar 

  38. Del Valle Y, Venayagamoorthy GK, Mohagheghi S, Hernandez J-C, Harley RG (2008) Particle swarm optimization: basic concepts, variants and applications in power systems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(2):171–195

    Google Scholar 

  39. Reeves CR (1993) Using genetic algorithms with small populations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth international conference on genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, pp 92–99

    Google Scholar 

  40. Beloglazov A, Abawajy J, Buyya R (2012) Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Futur Gener Comput Syst 28(5):755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Carlisle A, Dozier G (2001) An off-the-shelf pso [c/cd]. In: Proceedings of the workshop on particle swarm optimization. Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schutte JF (2001) Particle swarms in sizing and global optimization. Master’s Thesis, University of Pretoria, Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  43. Felician A, How to parallelize a sequential program

    Google Scholar 

  44. Amdahl GM (1967) Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities. In: Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, spring joint computer conference. ACM, pp 483–485

    Google Scholar 

  45. Calheiros RN, Ranjan R, Beloglazov A, De Rose CAF, Buyya R (2011) Cloudsim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw: Pract Exp, 41(1):23–50

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang S, Liu Z, Zheng Z, Sun Q, Yang F (2013) Particle swarm optimization for energy-aware virtual machine placement optimization in virtualized data centers. In: 2013 international conference on parallel and distributed systems. IEEE, pp 102–109

    Google Scholar 

  47. Premalatha K, Natarajan AM (2009) Hybrid pso and ga for global maximization. Int J Open Probl Compt Math 2(4):597–608

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Gavvala SK, Jatoth C, Gangadharan GR, Buyya R (2019) Qos-aware cloud service composition using eagle strategy. Futur Gener Comput Syst 90:273–290

    Google Scholar 

  49. Virtual library of simulation experiements: test functions and datasets. https://www.sfu.ca/~ssurjano/index.html

  50. Benchmarkfcns toolbox. http://benchmarkfcns.xyz/fcns

  51. Reddy VD, Gangadharan GR, Rao GSVRK (2017) Energy-aware virtual machine allocation and selection in cloud data centers. Soft Comput 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yapıcı H, Çetinkaya N (2017) An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm using eagle strategy for power loss minimization. Math Probl Eng

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented is supported by the project NextGenSmart DC (629.002.102) funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. R. Gangadharan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reddy, V.D., Gangadharan, G.R., Rao, G.S.V.R.K., Aiello, M. (2020). Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation in Data Centers Using a Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Rout, J., Rout, M., Das, H. (eds) Machine Learning for Intelligent Decision Science. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3689-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation