Abstract
It is presented that a basic strategy in philosophical analysis of technological innovation is to take the life world as the logic starting point, to focus on the tensions between the routine and innovative practices, and to explain why humans can conduct innovations based on traditions. Ontologically, technological innovations motivate and lie in the existential cycle of the human being. It is argued that the technological innovation stems from the rupture of the life world and the end of circular flow economy in face of the problematic situation and it is the process of trading, disputing, and resolving of such disputes. In this process, through a series of “mangles” and “experiments”, the technological problem is constructed and then solved, and eventually a new association of human and nonhuman is established, thus the life world is renewed and even reconstructed. The essence of human existence lies in technology (being) as well as in innovation (becoming), so it is absurd to deny technology and innovation and the only choice is to do technological innovations responsibly. Responsible innovation means not so much letting responsible people into the innovation process to supervise the irresponsible innovators, but rather to help broaden the innovation vision and to share such responsibilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Blok, V. (2018). Philosophy of innovation: A research agenda. Philosophy of Management, 17(1), 1–5.
Bourdieu, P. (1974). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucciarelli, L. L. (2003). Engineering philosophy, Delft University Press, 11.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics (p. 783). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. 783.
Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gorman, M. E. (Ed.). (2010). Trading zones and interactional expertise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Grunwald, Armin. (2014). The hermeneutic side of responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(3), 274–291.
Habermas, J. (1987). Theory of communicative action, volume two: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Translated by A. Thomas. McCarthy, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
Harman, G. (2007). Heidegger explained: From phenomenon to thing. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. London: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1984). Nietzsche. Translation by David Ferrell Krell. San Francisco: Harper and Row Publishing.
Husserl, E. (1954). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (Eds.). (2001). The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Krohn, W., & Weyer, J. (1994). Society as a laboratory: The social risks of experimental research. Science and Public Policy, 21(3), 173–183.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Martin, S. (2018). The virtues and vices of innovators. Philosophy of Management, 17(1), 79–95.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Reinert, H., & Reinert, E. S. (2006). Creative destruction in economics: Nietzsche, sombart, schumpeter. In J. G. Backhaus, W. Drechsler (Eds.), Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900): Economy and society (pp. 55–85). Springer.
Rosenberg, N., & Birdzell, L. E. (1987). How the West grew rich: The economic transformation of the industrial world. New York: Basic Books.
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shionoya, Y. (2010). Hermeneutics and the heidegger = schumpeter theses. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(1), 188–202.
Steiner, C. J. (1995). A philosophy for innovation: The role of unconventional individuals in innovation success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 431–440.
von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. R. Bessant & Heintz M (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 51–74). Wiley.
Wang, D. (2001). Technological innovation and institutional structures. Shenyang: Northeast University Press.
Wang, D., & Guan, S. (2004). On philosophy of technology, technological practice and rationality. Philosophical Researches, (11), 55–60.
Whitehead, A. N. (1911). An introduction to mathematics. London: Williams and Norgate.
Wittgenstein, L. (1979). On certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Verse 110.
**a, B., & Chen, C. (2001). On the philosophical study of technological innovation. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 17(8), 18–21, 35.
Zhang, B., & Wang, D. (2015). On phenomenology of artifacts: A new analysis framework. Philosophical Researches, (6), 113–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, D. (2020). Technology, Innovation and Life World: A Phenomenological Analysis. In: Wang, Q. (eds) Chinese Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 34. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1952-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1952-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1951-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1952-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)