Creating with Nature: Ecosophy C as an Ecological Rationality for Healing the Earth Community

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecological Wisdom

Part of the book series: EcoWISE ((EcoWISE))

  • 825 Accesses

Abstract

As a theory of philosophical ecology, Ecosophy C is an alternative to Arne Naess ’ Ecosophy T. It contains nine expressions with the capital C: Chinese culture , Confucianism, Continuity of being, Creating life , Compassion, Cheng Hao, Community, Cultural evils and Communicative reason . Ecosophy C asserts that the philosophical roots for today’s global ecological crisis fundamentally lie from the Fact/Value Dichotomy, which declares that values (such as moral obligations) could not be derived from facts and denies the possibility of logically deriving what ought to be from what is. The paper asserts that the key to healing the Earth Community Project is to reinterpret Hume ’s Is/Ought Dichotomy from the perspectives of ecology and ecosophy . With critical reflection on the reinterpretation for Hume ’s Is/Ought Dichotomy in today’s environmental ethics (represented by Callicott’s work), the paper offers an alternative resolution of Hume ’s Is/Ought Dichotomy from the perspective of Ecosophy C , which tries to transform the Aristotelian syllogism as a traditional way of justifying Leopold ’s “seeing as structure” towards a new way of asserting the is-ought statement. The fact-value structure upholds human agency with ecological rationality , which is educated by communicative reason and pursuing great virtue, creating life with Nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry TM (2006) In: Tucker ME (ed) Evening thoughts: reflecting on earth as sacred community. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry TM (2014) In: Tucker ME, Maryknoll JG (eds) Thomas Berry: selected writings on the earth community. Orbis Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Black M (1964) The gap between ‘Is’ and ‘Should’. Philos Rev 73(2):165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman J, Rehg W (2014) In: Zalta EN (ed) Jürgen Habermas. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/habermas/

  • Callicott JB (1982) Hume’s is/ought dichotomy and the relation of ecology to Leopold’s land ethic. Environ Ethics 4:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (1989) In defense of the land ethic: essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X (2013a) On the four keystones of ecological aesthetic appreciation. In: Estok SC, Kim W-C (eds) East Asian ecocriticisms: a critical reader. Macmillan, pp 213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X (2013b) Aesthetic engagement, Ecosophy C, and ecological appreciation. Contemp Aesthetics 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X (2016) Ecosophy and ecoaesthetics: a Chinese perspective. In: Zapf H (ed) Handbook of ecocriticism and cultural ecology. de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, pp 481–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon R (2010) In: Zalta EN (ed) Hume’s moral philosophy. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/hume-moral/

  • Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society, vol 1 (trans: McCarthy T). Beacon, Boston (German, 1981, vol 1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolber E (2014) The sixth extinction: an unnatural history. Henry Holt and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1989) A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1991) In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of god and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg IL, Steiner FL (eds) (1998) To heal the earth: selected writings of Ian L. McHarg. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 199

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Barrett GW (2005) Fundamentals of ecology, 5th edn. Brooks Cole, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston III H (2005) Ecology. In: Mitcham C (ed) Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics, vol 2. Macmillan Reference USA, Thomson/Gale, Farmington Hills, Ml. pp 580–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd PM, Gigerenzer G, The ABC Research Group (2012) Ecological rationality: intelligence in the world. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **angzhan Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, X. (2019). Creating with Nature: Ecosophy C as an Ecological Rationality for Healing the Earth Community. In: Yang, B., Young, R. (eds) Ecological Wisdom. EcoWISE. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0571-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation