Abstract
There have been many reports of increasing numbers of resurfacing hip arthroplasty revisions because of unexplained pain and adverse local tissue reactions, especially with the Articular Surface Replacement system. Thus, the use of many resurfacing hip replacements has been declining. In contrast, the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system has shown excellent long-term survivorship compared with other resurfacing prostheses, especially for young and active patients with osteoarthritis. Some reports on primary total resurfacing hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) showed a higher rate of revision than primary osteoarthritis, but it is controversial whether a diagnosis of DDH itself is an independent risk factor for failure of hip resurfacing or it is related to its characteristics of female dominant gender and smaller component size. With most resurfacing prostheses, small components have a small coverage arc, indicating that small acetabular components have a narrower safe zone for the alignment against edge loading. Thus, strict control of acetabular component alignment is essential to prevent adverse wear for patients with DDH. It also requires surgical skill to fix an acetabular component using the press-fit technique alone. With a severely deformed femoral head, it is technically demanding to determine the proper insertion position and alignment of the guidewire while avoiding notch formation and preparing a healthy host bone with sufficient stability for the femoral components. Sufficient surgical experience, a properly designed prosthesis, and dedicated alignment control via intraoperative radiographic checks and/or computer technology (e.g., navigation or a patient-specific surgical guidance) would be required to improve implant survival of hip resurfacing for patients with DDH. We believe that DDH itself is not a contraindication for primary total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(2):185–9.
Hayaishi Y, Miki H, Nishii T, Hananouchi T, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Proximal femoral bone mineral density after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty and after standard stem-type cementless total hip arthroplasty, both having similar neck preservation and the same articulation type. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(8):1208–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.001.
Marshall DA, Pykerman K, Werle J, Lorenzetti D, Wasylak T, Noseworthy T, Dick DA, O’Connor G, Sundaram A, Heintzbergen S, Frank C. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(7):2217–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3.
Abe H, Sakai T, Nishii T, Takao M, Nakamura N, Sugano N. Jogging after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(1):131–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513506866.
Aqil A, Drabu R, Bergmann JH, Masjedi M, Manning V, Andrews B, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Cobb JP. The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study. Int Orthop. 2013;37(5):795–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1819-3.
Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.92b1.22770.
Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland JP, Nargol AV, De Smet KA. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93(2):164–71. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.93b2.25099.
National Joint Registry: 13th annual report, National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. 2016. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports,PublicationsandMinutes/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx.
Australian National Joint Registry Annual Report. 2016. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2016.
Lin ZM, Meakins S, Morlock MM, Parsons P, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac G. Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1: experimental simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2006;220(2):299–309.
McMinn D, Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2006;220(2):239–51.
Prosser GH, Yates PJ, Wood DJ, Graves SE, de Steiger RN, Miller LN. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):66–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003685434.
Shimmin AJ, Walter WL, Esposito C. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(4):469–76. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.92b4.22967.
Liu F, Gross TP. A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(7):1224–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.033.
Van Der Straeten C, De Smet KA. Current expert views on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Consensus of the 6th advanced hip resurfacing course, Ghent, Belgium, May 2014. Hip Int. 2016;26(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000288.
Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-b(10):1298–306. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b10.33695.
Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Takao M, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(2):176–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.008.
Amstutz HC, Antoniades JT, Le Duff MJ. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(2):339–46. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.00576.
Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Harvey N, Hoberg M. Improved survivorship of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with second-generation techniques for Crowe-I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):12–20. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.00711.
McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90(6):715–23. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b6.19875.
McBryde CW, Shears E, O'Hara JN, Pynsent PB. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in developmental dysplasia: a case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90(6):708–14. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b6.20026.
Naal FD, Schmied M, Munzinger U, Leunig M, Hersche O. Outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(6):1516–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0456-4.
Wang Q, Zhang XL, Chen YS, Shen H, Shao JJ. Resurfacing arthroplasty for hip dysplasia: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94(6):768–73. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.94b6.28522.
Gaillard MD, Gross TP. Reducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1095-7.
Gross TP, Liu F. Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2012;36(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1290-y.
Nakasone S, Takao M, Nishii T, Sakai T, Sugano N. Incidence and natural course of initial polar gaps in Birmingham Hip Resurfacing cups. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(9):1676–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.028.
Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 Suppl 1):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017.
Takao M, Nakamura N, Ohzono K, Sakai T, Nishii T, Sugano N. The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(4):562–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.05.025.
Hananouchi T, Nishii T, Lee SB, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. The vascular network in the femoral head and neck after hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(1):146–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.014.
Nakajima Y, Dohi T, Sasama T, Momoi Y, Sugano N, Tamura Y, Lim SH, Sakuma I, Mitsuishi M, Koyama T, Yonenobu K, Ohashi S, Bessho M, Ohnishi I. Surgical tool alignment guidance by drawing two cross-sectional laser-beam planes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(6):1467–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2012.2204748.
Kitada M, Sakai T, Murase T, Hanada T, Nakamura N, Sugano N. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation. Int J Med Rob. 2013;9(2):223–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1490.
Nakasone S, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Sugano N. Does the extent of osteonecrosis affect the survival of hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(6):1926–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2833-x.
Ziaee H, Daniel J, Datta AK, Blunt S, McMinn DJ. Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(3):301–5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b3.18520.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takao, M., Sakai, T., Hamada, H., Sugano, N. (2018). Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia. In: Lai, KA. (eds) Developmental Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Adults. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0414-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0414-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0413-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0414-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)