Comparative Study of Seismic Behavior of Tunnel Form Building Between Experiment and Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
InCIEC 2015

Abstract

It is important to validate the hysteresis loops between the experimental results while modeling using HYSTERES program in Ruaumoko 2-D. One-third scale three-storey double unit tunnel form building was designed using BS8110, and constructed and tested under in-plane lateral cyclic loading. Parameters such as ultimate lateral load, stiffness, ductility, and equivalent viscous dam** (EVD) were calculated using the experimental hysteresis loops. The analytical result from the modeling of hysteresis loops was compared with experimental results for validation purposes. The modeling of hysteresis loops was developed using Modified SINA hysteresis rule in the HYSTERES program. This type of hysteresis rule was selected because it is most similar to the hysteresis loops obtained from experimental work. The comparison results show good correlation as the percentage difference is less than 5 % for all parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 181.89
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 234.33
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 320.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Nor Hayati, M. S. Saleha, and A.A. Shamilah, “Seismic Performance of Double Unit Tunnel Form Building Under In-plane Lateral Cyclic Loading,” Structures under shock and impact XIII, 141, 467, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Nor Hayati, A.A. Shamilah, and A. Nur Liyana, “Retrofitting of a Double Unit Tunnel Form Building Using Additional RC Wall, Steel Angle and CFRP”, Applied mechanics and materials, 661, pp. 123–127, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Nor Hayati, A.A. Shamilah, and A. Nur Liyana, “Retrofitting of a Double Unit Tunnel Form Building Using Additional RC Wall, Steel Angle and CFRP”, Applied mechanics and materials, 661, pp. 123–127, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Nor Hayati, and A. A. Shamilah, “Modeling of a Tunnel Form Building Using Ruaumoko 2D Program”; Advanced engineering and technology, pp.77–81, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Kay Dora, and H. Nor Hayati, “Modeling Hysteresis Loops of Corner Beam-Column Joint Using Ruaumoko Program,” Advanced engineering and technology, pp. 115–119, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.J. Carr, “RUAUMOKO Manual,” (volume 1: Theory), University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zeland, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Kay Dora, H. Nor Hayati, and M. S., Jaafar, “Load Versus Displacement Validation between Ruaumoko Hysteresis Program and Experimental Work on CFRP Retrofitted Precast Beam-Column Exterior Joint”, Key Engineering Materials Vols. 594–595, pp. 390-394, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Kalkan, and S. Bahadir Yuksel, “ Pros and Cons of Multistorey RC Tunnel Form (Box-Type) Buildings”, The structural design of tall and special buildings, struct. Design tall spec. build. Pusblish online in Wiley Intersicence (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/tal.368, 2007 in press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.I. Jun, A.S. Elnashai, D.A. Kuchma, “An Analytical Framework For Seismic Fragility Analysis of RC High-rise Buildings,” Engineering structures 29, pp. 3197–3209

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Mostofinejad, and S.B. Talaeitaba, “Finite Element Modeling of RC Connections Strengthened with FRP Laminates’, Iranian Journal of Science & Tachnology, transaction B. Engineering, vol. 30, No. B1, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Han-Seon, and W. Sung-Woo, “Seismic Performance of a 3-storey RC Frame in A Low-Seismicity Region”, Enineering structures 24, pp. 719–734, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saidi and Sozen,‘Simple and Complex Models for Nonlinears Seismic Responsed Concrete Structures, UILU 79–2013, 1979

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to the e-Science Fund from MOSTI (Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation), Putrajaya, Malaysia and RMI (Research Management Institute) for the funding of this research. Furthermore, special thanks and appreciation are conveyed to all technicians in the Heavy Structural Laboratory, Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM for assisting in this experimental work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Anudai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Anudai, S.A., Hamid, N.H., Hashim, M.H. (2016). Comparative Study of Seismic Behavior of Tunnel Form Building Between Experiment and Modeling. In: Yusoff, M., Hamid, N., Arshad, M., Arshad, A., Ridzuan, A., Awang, H. (eds) InCIEC 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0155-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0155-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0154-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0155-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation