Abstract
Taking the analysis of the Finnish case of public higher education as its starting point, this chapter discusses the following issues: the change in the mission of the university from being a knowledge-oriented to a pragmatically ‘utilitarian’ institution; the university as an institution situated between its academic mission and its entrepreneurial function; the impact of the policy of market competition and accountability on the quality, production and creativity of academic knowledge; the impact of globalisation on the natural sciences and the humanities in academia; and the new power equation involved in the relationships that exist between the faculties and administration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The founding fathers of the German universities were mainly philosophers, a fact that becomes obvious when we read about the mission of this university.
- 2.
This scathing critique, which is mainly directed at American universities, may also find some echoes on the campuses of European universities.
- 3.
For example, the recruitment of international students is having a significant impact on the economy of many universities (e.g. in the United Kingdom).
- 4.
A small country like Finland is very sensitive to the positive and negative impacts of globalisation. This has provided tremendous opportunities for it to export its high-tech know-how, contributing considerably to its prosperity and welfare. However, the more the Finnish economy is tied to the international capitalist market and its avatars, the more the funding of its institutions is exposed to fluctuations in the market. Hence, the university, as an institution financed by the State whose financial room for manoeuvre has been reduced under the impact of economic globalisation, finds itself more vulnerable than ever.
- 5.
As elsewhere in Europe there is in the Finnish university, as stated by Taylor et al. (2002, p. 118), ‘… a plethora of Business School chairs in traditional, research-led universities, in the now seemingly respectable areas of Marketing, Accountancy – even Credit Management. Appointments such as the latter, if not the former, would have been academically and intellectually unthinkable twenty years earlier. At a more general level, the phenomenon of the global, corporate university located entirely within the private sector and usually with a strong emphasis on IT delivery and a virtual existence, is increasingly common…’.
- 6.
Polyvalence is becoming one of the magic formulas in academia. Mittelstrass (1994, p. 49) outlines three forms of modernity, which are represented by three heroes: (i) the space of Christopher Columbus (Kolumbus-Welt) (in this space man is seen as discoverer of the world), (ii) the space of G.W. Leibniz (Leibniz-Welt) where there is an endeavour to make the real intelligible and where man is the interpreter of the world and (iii) the space of Leonardo da Vinci (Leonardo-Welt) where man tries to be an artisan and creator of a world that corresponds to his needs. Mittelstrass argues that the contemporary society is in need of a ‘Leonardian university’ (Leonardo-Universitität). In the spirit of Leonardo da Vinci (architect, engineer, artist, scholar) this university has to be a multidisciplinary polyvalent institution (see Renaut 1995, p. 147).
References
Ahola, S. (1995). Eliitin yliopistosta massojen korkeakoulutukseen. Korkeakoulutuksen muuttuva asema yhteiskunnallisen valikoinnin järjestelmänä (From Elite University to the Higher Education of Masses.). Turun yliopisto, Koulutussosiologian tutkimuskeskus, raportti 30.
Aittola, H. (2001). Academic life and the pressure of massification. In J. Välimaa (Ed.), Finnish higher education in transition: Perspectives on massification and globalisation. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research.
Altbach, P. G. (2001). Higher education and the WTO: Globalization run Amok. International Higher Education, 23(Spring), 1–4.
Bauman, Z. (1997). The present crisis of the universities. In J. Brzezinski & L. Nowak (Eds.), The idea of the university. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Cobban, A. (1975). The Medieval universities: Their development and organization. London: Methuen.
Dällenbach, J.-F., et al. (1986). Un territoire mal connu: La fonction de service des universities [Unknown territory: The service function of universities]. Berne: Conseil Suisse de la Science.
Delanty, G. (2001). Challenging knowledge: The university in the knowledge society. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Delanty, G. (2002). The university and modernity: A history of the present. In K. Robins & F. Webster (Eds.), The virtual university. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Derrida, J. (1983). The principle of reason: The university in the eyes of its pupils. Diacritics, 13(Fall), 3–20.
Fourastié, J. (1971). Faillite de l’université [Failure of the university]. Paris: Gallimard.
Gilbert, A. (2000). The idea of a university beyond 2000. Retrieved from http://www.cis.org.au/bertkelly/bk300.ht
Green, A. (1997). Education, globalisation and the nation state. London: MacMillan.
Grit, K. (1997). The rise of the entrepreneurial university: A heritage of the enlightenment. Sciences Studies, 10(2), 3–23.
Gur-Ze’ev, I. (1997). The vocation of higher education – Modern and postmodern rhetorics in the Israeli academia on strike. Retrieved from http://construct.haifa.ac.il/~ilangz/A12.html
Hartley, D. (1995). The ‘McDonaldization’ of higher education: Food for thought? Oxford Review of Education, 21(4), 409–423.
Hölttä, S. (1995). The self-regulative university (Publications in social sciences, 23). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
Jarvis, P. (2001). Universities and corporate universities. London: Kogan Page.
Keast, D. A. (1995). Entrepreneurship in universities: Definitions, practices, and implications. Higher Education Quarterly, 49(3), 248–266.
Klinge, M. (1987). Keisarillinen Aleksanterin yliopisto 1808–1917 [The Imperial Alexander University]. Helsinki: Otava.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mittelstrass, J. (1994). Die unzeifgemässe Universität [The old-fashioned university]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Nisbet, R. (1971). The degradation of the academic dogma. London: Heinemann.
Pollit, C. (1995). Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the new public management. Evaluation, 1(2), 133–154.
Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Renaut, A. (1995). Les révolutions de l’université, essai sur la modernisation de la culture [Revolutions of the university, an essay on the modernisation of culture]. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
Roos, J. P. (2003, January 16). Rahalla huonoksi tohtoriksi? (Using money for getting a doctor degree). Anna, pp. 14–15.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1979). Leçons sur la méthode des études académiques (1803) [Lessons on the method of academic studies (1803)]. In L. Ferry et al. (Eds.), Philosophies de l’université: l’idéalisme allemand et la question de l’université [Philosophies of university: The German idealism and the question of the university]. Paris: Payot.
Scott, P. (1984). The crisis of the university. London: Croom Helm.
Taylor, R., et al. (2002). For a radical higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Touraine, A. (1971). The May movement: Revolt and reform. New York: Random House.
Välimaa, J. (2001a). Finnish higher education in transition: Perspectives on massification and globalisation. In J. Välimaa (Ed.), Institute for educational research. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Välimaa, J. (2001b). A historical introduction to Finnish higher education. In J. Välimaa (Ed.), Finnish higher education in transition: Perspectives on massification and globalisation. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.
von Humboldt, W. (1979). Sur l’organisation interne et externe des établissements scientifiques supérieurs à Berlin (1809) in Philosophies de l’université: l’idéalisme allemand et la question de l’université [On the internal and external organisation high scientific institutions in Berlin (1809)]. In L. Ferry et al. (Eds.), Philosophies de l’université: l’idéalisme allemand et la question de l’université [Philosophies of university: The German idealism and the question of the university]. Paris: Payot.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sabour, M. (2015). The Impact of Globalisation on the Mission of the University. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9492-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9493-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)