• 56 Accesses

Abstract

On analyzing the draft Convention in the previous chapter, we found that on the whole it was acceptable — apart from a few minor additions and amendments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The statement made by Honig in NJB 1951, page 317, that in the drafts published up to now no rules are laid down regarding liability, is untrue.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avant-projet de Convention par M. Thieffry (1927), art. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The relative proposals have in the meantime been incorporated in the Conventions of Warsaw and Rome, see pages 88 and 94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Compte Rendu des Réunions de la 4ème Commission, Doc. 2, page 11 onwards.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rapport par M. Babinski, Doc. 17 art. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Compte Rendu des Réunions de la 4ème Commission, Doc. 37, page 49 onwards.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rapport Supplémentaire par M. Babinski, Doc. 67, art. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Compte Rendu des Réunions de la 4ème Commission, Doc. 84, page 40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Compte Rendu de la 6ème Session, Doc. 162, page 92.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ICAO Doc. A4 — WP/154.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flight Safety Foundation, Accident Prevention Bulletin, 50-8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. Cleveringa, „Het Nieuwe Zeerecht”, page 233.

    Google Scholar 

  13. NJB 1951, page 317.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Avant-Projet de Convention par M. Babinski, Doc. 119, page 12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goedhuis, RDILC 1933, page 142.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Observations par M. Georgiades, Doc. 432, page 5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. To this effect Garnault in Doc. 434, page 6; Wilberforce in Doc. 493, page 73; de Smet in Doc. 496, page 30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Honig, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Honig, loc. cit.; Maschino, op. cit. page 116; Riese, “Luftrecht”, page 220; Wüstendorfer, ArchfLR 1931, page 212; Bucher, op. cit. page 149.

    Google Scholar 

  20. cf. Cleveringa, „Het Nieuwe Zeerecht” page 254.

    Google Scholar 

  21. The case given by Knauth (ILA Legal Committee, Lucerne Conference 1952, page 25) of a criminal esca** by parachute is of a hypothetic nature.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. Legal Committee, Minutes and Documents 8th Session, Doc. 7229—LC/133.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1953 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamminga, M.S. (1953). Additions to the Draft. In: The Aircraft Commander in Commercial Air Transportation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9467-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9467-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8671-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9467-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation