Abstract
Since the time of Aristotle, logic has developed as a formalism for modelling the correct construction of arguments which demonstrate that a conclusion necessarily follows from a set of premises. It was perhaps in kee** with the Greek obsession with absolutes that there was to be no uncertainty or doubt associated with these arguments. The arguments were used to establish facts; they were deductive proofs. Indeed Aristotle held that deductive proof was the sole basis for establishing facts in mathematics.
Life is the art of drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient premises.
(Samuel Butler)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krause, P., Clark, D. (1993). Non-monotonic Logic. In: Representing Uncertain Knowledge. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2084-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2084-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4925-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2084-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive