Regulation of Regional Electric Companies in the British Electricity Experiment

  • Chapter
From Regulation to Competition: New frontiers in electricity markets

Abstract

While competition may provide feasible incentives for management efficiency in electricity generation, transmission and distribution have properties of a natural monopoly; entry has been restricted and rates have been regulated. In Chapter 5, Hunt and Shuttleworth explored inefficiencies in the regulation of Britain’s National Grid Company. This chapter considers regulation of the twelve regional electric companies (RECs).

Views are personal and not those of the U.S. Department of Justice. I thank David Hawkins, Martin Hall, Ingo Vogelsang, Andrew Walker, and Greg Werden for assistance. Errors are my own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
GBP 9.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averch, H., and L.L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review, 52(6): 1053–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S., and J. Demski. 1980. “Economically Optimal Performance Evaluation and Control Systems.” Journal of Accounting Research, 18: 184–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., and D.F. Bradford. 1970. “Optimal Departures from Marginal Cost Pricing.” American Economic Review, 60(3): 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T.J. 1989. “Regulating by Cap** Prices.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1(2): 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., M.A. Einhorn, and I. Vogelsang. 1989. Incentive Regulation: A Research Report. Washington, D.C.: Office of Economic Policy. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., M.A. Einhorn, and I. Vogelsang. 1991. “Toward Improved and Practical Incentive Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 3(1): 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.J., and D.S. Sibley. 1986. The Theory of Public Utility Pricing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edison Electric Institute. 1988. Engineering and Reliability Effects of Increased Wheeling and Transmission Access. Washington, D.C.: Edison Electric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 1992. Pipeline Service Obligations and Revisions to Regulations Governing Self-Implementing Transportation Under Part 284 of the Commission’s Regulations. Order No. 636. 18 CFR Part 284. Washington, D.C.: FERC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Penner, P. 1990. Electric Power Transmission and Wheeling: A Technical Primer. Washington, D.C.: Edison Electric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. 1992. “Markets in Real Electric Networks Require Reactive Prices.” Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. 1982. “Moral Hazard in Teams.” Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 324–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P., and R. Schmalensee. 1986. “Incentive Regulation for Electric Utilities.” Yale Journal of Regulation, 4: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.J., and J. Tirole. 1986. “Using Cost Observations to Regulate Firms.” Journal of Political Economy, 94: 614–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.J., and J. Tirole. 1993. A Theory of Incentives for Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Electricity Regulation. 1992a. Energy Efficiency: The Way Forward. Birmingham, U.K.: Office of Electricity Regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Electricity Regulation. 1992b. Review of Economic Purchasing. Birmingham, U.K.: Office of Electricity Regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Electricity Regulation. 1992c. The Supply Price Control Review. Birmingham, U.K.: Office of Electricity Regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelstein, S. 1988. “Constructing Incentive Schemes for Government Contracts: An Application of Agency Theory.” Mimeo, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S. 1986. “Practices that (Credibly) Facilitate Oligopoly Coordination.” In J.E. Stiglitz and G.F. Mathewson (eds.), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. 1989. “Good Regulatory Regimes.” Rand Journal of Economics, 20(3): 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. 1985. “A Theory of Yardstick Competition.” Rand Journal of Economics, 16: 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsang, I. 1989. Two-Part Tariffs as Regulatory Constraints.” Journal of Public Economics, 39: 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsang, I. 1991. “A Non-Bayesian Incentive Mechanism Using Two-Part Tariffs.” In Price Caps and Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications, edited by M. Einhorn. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsang, I., and J. Finsinger. 1979. “A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms.” Bell Journal of Economics, 10(2): 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E.E. 1972. “Note on ‘Gold Plating’ or ‘Rate Base Padding.’” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3(1): 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Einhorn, M.A. (1994). Regulation of Regional Electric Companies in the British Electricity Experiment. In: Einhorn, M.A. (eds) From Regulation to Competition: New frontiers in electricity markets. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1368-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation