3 Wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar seksualiteit

  • Chapter
Seksuologie

Part of the book series: Quintessens ((QUI))

  • 7974 Accesses

Samenvatting

De eerste pogingen om menselijke seksualiteit te bestuderen met methoden die enigszins vergelijkbaar zijn met wat nu gebruikelijk is dateren uit de negentiende eeuw; parallel aan de wetenschappelijke professionalisering van de medische wetenschap en het op de achtergrond raken van de rol van religie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Weis DL The use of theory in sexuality research. J Sex Res 1998;35:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford CS, Beach FA. Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeLamater JD, Hyde JS. Essentialism versus social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. J Sex Res 1998;35(1):10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey JM, Pillard RC. A genetic study ofmale sexual orientation. Arch Gen Psychiat 1991;48:1089–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagnon JH, Simon W. Sexual conduct. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Groot AD. Methodologie. Grondslagen van onderzoek en denken in de gedragswetenschappen. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masters W, Johnson V. The human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000;26:191–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meuleman EJ, Donkers LH, Robertson C et al. Erectiestoornis: prevalentie en invloed op de kwaliteit van leven; het Boxmeer-onderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001;145:576–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandfort TGM, De Graaf R, Bijl RV. Same-sex sexuality and quality of life: Findings from the Netherlands Mental Health survey and incidence study. Arch Sex Behav 2003;32:15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laan E, Van Driel E, Van Lunsen RHW. Seksuele reacties van vrouwen met een seksuele opwindingsstoornis op visuele seksuele stimuli. Tijdschr Seksuol 2003;27:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Slob AK, Koster J, Radder JK, et al. Sexuality and psychophysiological functioning in women with diabetes mellitus. J Sex Marital Ther 1990;16:59–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heiman JR, Meston CM. Empirically validated treatment for sexual dysfunction. Ann Rev Sex Res 1997;8:148–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laan E, Van Lunsen RHW. Seks en farmaca. Tijdschr Seksuol 2002;26:253–62.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kazdin AE. Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cook TD, Campbell DT. The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In: Dunnette MD, editor. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hersen M, Barlow DH. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Onghena P, Edgington ES. Randomization tests for restricted alternating treatments designs. Behav Res Ther 1994;32:783–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosen RC, Leiblum SR. Treatment of sexual disorders in the 1990s: An integrated approach. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:877–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Souverein PC, Egberts AC, Meuleman EJ, et al. Incidence and determinants of sildenafil (dis)continuation: the Dutch cohort of sildenafil users. Int J Imp Res 2002;14:259–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ernst C, Foldenyi M, Angst J. The Zurich Study: XXI Sexual dysfunctions and disturbances in young adults. Data of a longitudinal epidemiological study. Eur Arch Psychiat Clin Neurosci 1993;243:179–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiegel MA, Scepkowski LA, Barlow DH. Cognitiveaffective processes in sexual arousal and sexual dysfunction. In E. Janssen (Ed.). The psychophysiology of sex (pp.143–165). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Laan E, Everaerd W, Van Berlo R, et al. Mood and sexual arousal in women. Behav Res Ther 1995;33: 441–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Daker-White G. Reliable and valid self-report outcome measures in sexual (dys)function: A systematic review. Arch Sex Behav 2002;31:197–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hays RD, Anderson RT, Revicki D. Assessing the reliability and validity of measurements in clinical trials. In: Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM, editors. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998:169–82.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Conte HR. Development and use of self-report techniques for assessing sexual functioning: A review and critique. Arch Sex Behav 1983;12:555–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vroege JA. De Vragenlijst voor het Signaleren vanSeksuele Dysfuncties (VSD). Bruikbaarheid in de klinische praktijk. Delft: Eburon, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959;56:85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rassin E. De waarde van het woord. Over het belang van zelfrapportages voor de psychologie. Psychol 2004;39:10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Damasio AR. Looking for Spinoza. Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando: Harcourt, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loftus EF. Creating false memories. Sci Am 1972;77: 50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schwarz N. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 1999;54:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Everaerd W. Het psychofysiologisch laboratorium en seksuele disfuncties. Tijdschr Seksuol 2003;27: 83–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosen RC, Beck JG. Patterns of sexual arousal. New York: Guilford Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wolpe J. Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Oxford: Stanford University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barlow DH. Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986;54:140–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Janssen E. Psychophysiological measurement of sexual arousal. In: Wiederman MW, Whitley BE, editors. Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002:139–71.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hamann S, Herman RA, Nolan CL, et al. Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nat Neuroscience 2004;7:411–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chivers ML, Bailey JM. A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biol Psychol 2005;70:115–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Laan E, Everaerd W. Determinants of female sexual arousal: Psychophysiological theory and data. Ann Rev Sex Res 1995;6:32–76.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Laan E, Janssen E. ‘Beleefde seks’: Determinanten van seksuele gevoelens. Psychol 2002;37:370–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Laan E, Everaerd W, Van Aanhold M, et al. Performance demand and sexual arousal in women. Behav Res Ther 1993;31:25–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wolchik SA, Spencer SL, Lisi IS. Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 1983;12:399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, et al. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1397–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tiefer L. The medicalization of sexuality: Conceptual, normative, and professional issues. Ann Rev Sex Res 1996;7:252–82.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Basson R, Weijmar Schultz WCM, Binik YM, et al. Women’s sexual desire and arousal disorders and sexual pain. In: Basson R, Rosen R, Khoury S, editors. Second international consultation on sexual medicine: Men’s and women’s sexual dysfunction. Paris: Health Publications Limited, in druk.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Plaud JJ, Gaither GA, Hegstad HJ, et al. Volunteer bias in human psychophysiological sexual arousal research: To whom do our research results apply? J Sex Res 1999;36:171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Farkas GM, Sine LF, Evans IM. Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 1978;7:513–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Trivedi N, Sabini J. Volunteer bias, sexuality, and personality. Arch Sex Behav 1998;27:181–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Heiman JR, Schloredt KA. Ethical and cultural concerns in sexual function assessment. Int J Imp Res 1998;10(S2):S134-S137.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Friedman LS, Richter ED. Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:51–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Wiederman MW. Institutional Review Boards and conducting sexuality research. In: Wiederman MW, Whitley BE, editors. Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002:479–504.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Veenhoven R. Bevrijde seks: tijd, cultuur en geluk. Psychol 2002;37:377–82.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Cognitions, emotions, and sexual response: analysis of the relationship among automatic thoughts, emotional responses, and sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(4):652–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sand MS, Fisher W, Rosen R, Heiman J, Eardley I. Erectile dysfunction and constructs of masculinity and quality of life in the multinational Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study. J Sex Med. 2008;5(3):583–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sidi H, Naing L, Midin M, Nik Jaafar NR. The Female Sexual Response Cycle: Do Malaysian Women Conform to the Circular Model? J Sex Med. 2008;5:2359–2366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Lankveld, J., Laan, E. (2009). 3 Wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar seksualiteit. In: Gijs, L., Gianotten, W., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Weijenborg, P. (eds) Seksuologie. Quintessens. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6806-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6806-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-313-5187-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-313-6806-8

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation