Zusammenfassung
Setzen Frauen Tratsch wie eine Präzisionswaffe ein? Man sagt ihnen nach, sie seien Expertinnen im Lästern und zugleich verletzbarer durch üble Nachrede als Männer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 171–193.
Hess, N. C. (2000). Female coalitions and gossip: Tw o experiments. Vortrag auf der Jahreskonferenz der Human Behavior and Evolution Society.
Hess, N. C. & Hagen, E. H. (2002). Informational warfare. Abrufbar im Internet unter: http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/∼hess/gossip.pdf.CogPrints IDcog00002112.
McAndrew, F. T. & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1064–1082.
Nezlek, J. B., Wheeler, L. & Reis, H. (1990). Academic performance and social behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationsships, 7, 291–309.
Collins, D. W. & Kimura, D. A. (1997). Large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 845–849.
Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R. & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12, 258–261.
Dar-Nimrod, I. & Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women’s math performance. Science, 314 (5798), 435.
Geary, D. C. (2003). Hommes, femmes, l’Évolution des Differences Sexuelles Humaines. Paris: DeBoeck.
Guimond, S. & Roussel, L. (2001). Bragging about one’s school grades: Gender stereoty** and students’ perception of their abilities in science, mathematics and language. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 275–293.
Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication Accuracy and Expressive Style. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2. Aufl.
Halpern, D. F. & Wright, T. M. (1996). A process oriented model of cognitive sex-differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 8 (1), 3–24
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g Factor. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L. & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M. & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Wennerds, C. & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 307 (6631), 341.
Taylor, A., Kuo, F. & Sullivan, W. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology; Special Issue: Children and the Environment, 22 (1–2), 49–63.
Burke, N. (2001). The effect of gender on the personality characteristics assigned to various facial expressions. Abrufbar im Internet unter: http://clearinghouse.mwsc.edu/manuscripts/268.asp.
DeSantis, M. & Nathan, S. (2000). Women smiled more often and openly than men when photographed for a pleasant, public occasion in 20th century United States society. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 37, 21–31.
Dodd, D., Russell, B. & Jenkins, C. (1999). Smiling in school yearbook photos : Gender differences from kindergarten to adulthood. The Psychological Record, 49, 543–554.
Hinsz, V. & Tomhave, J. (1991). Smile and (half) the world smiles with you, frown and you frown alone. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 586–592.
Lau, S. (1982). The effect of smiling on person perception. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 63–67.
Otta, E. (1998). Sex differences over age groups in self-posed smiling in photographs. Psychological Reports, 83, 907–913.
Solomon, H., Zener-Solomon, L., Arnone, M., Maur, B., Reda, R. & Roth, E. (1981). Anonymity and hel**. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 37–43.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D. & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.
Buunk, B. P. & Dijkstra, P. (2004). Gender differences in rival characteristics that evoke jealousy in response to emotional versus sexual infidelity. Personal Relationships, 11, 395–408.
Buzzell, T. (2005). Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality & Culture, 9 (1), 28–48.
Deaner, R. O., Khera, A. V. & Platt, M. L. (2005). Monkeys pay per view: Adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Current Biology, 15 (6), 27.
Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L. & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Spektrum Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ciccotti, S. (2011). Einige Unterschiede zwischen Männern und Frauen. In: 150 psychologische Aha-Experimente. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2844-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2844-8_7
Publisher Name: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-8274-2843-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-8274-2844-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)