Cognitive Abilities of Fish

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stupid as a Fish?
  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes exemplary basic cognitive abilities of fish. It contains information about territorial and social behavior. The prey-catching behavior of archerfish, which “shoot” insects sitting or flying on leaves with the help of water jets, is described in detail. It is shown that archerfish not only determine the size and distance of an insect, but also the point of impact of the insect on the water surface within a few milliseconds, thereby increasing their probability of success in prey capture. The behavior of cleaner fish, i.e., fish that free other fish from parasites and dead skin flakes, is also discussed in detail. Further sections deal with social learning, mate choice, social life, and stress processing. Finally, it is shown that different fish can even have different personalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrillo, C., & Bisazza, A. (2018). Understanding the origin of number sense: A review of fish studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1740), 20160511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rst.2016.0511

  • Aronson, L. R. (1951). Orientation and jum** behavior in the gobiid fish Bathygobius soporator. American Museum of Natural History City New York, 1486, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcombe, J. (2016). What a fish knows. The inner lives of our underwater cousins. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, H., & Uhlig, P. (1974). Kein Platz für wilde Menschen. Goverts Krüger Stahlberg Verlags GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierbach, D., Laskowski, K. L., & Wolf, M. (2017). Behavioural individuality in clonal fish arises despite near-identical rearing conditions. Nature Communications, 8, 15361. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Laland, K., & Krause, J. (2006). Fish cognition and behavior. Fish and aquatic resources series 11. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. E., & Brown, J. A. (1993). Social dynamics in salmonid fishes: do kin make better neighbours? Animal Behaviour, 45, 863–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R., Wickler, W., & Fricke, H. (2002). Fish cognition: A primate’s eye view. Animal Cognition, 5, 1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, M. M. M., & Schluessel, V. (2020). Serial reversal learning in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro). Animal Cognition, 23, 109–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, J. K., & Fernals, R. D. (2010). What do fish make of mirror images? Biology Letters, 6, 744–747. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0247.

  • Fischer, E. A. (1980). The relationship between mating system and simultaneous hermaphroditism in the coral reef fish, Hypoplectrus nigricans (Serranidae). Animal Behaviour, 28, 620–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, S., Buechel, S. D., Boussard, A., Kotrschal, A., & Kolm, N. (2019). Plastic changes in brain morphology in relation to learning and environmental enrichment in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Journal of Experimental Biology, 222, https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200402.

  • Fuss, T., Bleckmann, H., & Schluessel, V. (2014). The brain creates illusions not just for us: Sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) can „see the magic“ as well. Front Neural Circuits, 8,. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00024.

  • Fuss, T., Russnak, V., Stehr, K., & Schluessel, V. (2017). World in motion: Perception and discrimination of movement in juvenile grey bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum). Animal Behavior and Cognition, 4, 223–241. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.04.03.03.2017.

  • Gierszewski, S., Bleckmann, H., & Schluessel, V. (2013). Cognitive abilities in malawi cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.): Matching-to-sample and image/mirror-Image discriminations. PLOS ONE, 8(2), E57363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057363.

  • Hardy, A. R., & Hale, M. E. (2020). Sensing the structural characteristics of surfaces: texture encoding by a bottom-dwelling fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 223. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.227280.

  • Herczeg, G., Urszan, T. J., Orf, S., Nagy, G., Kotrschal, A., & Kolm, N. (2019). Brain size predicts behavioural plasticity in guppies (Poecilia reticulata): An experiment.  Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 32, 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A. E. (1997). Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, H., Ishikawa, Y., Yoshimoto, M., & Yamamoto, N. (2007). Diversity of brain morphology in teleosts: Brain and ecological niche. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 69, 76–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moiron, M., Laskovski, K. L., & Niemelä, P. T. (2019). Individual differences in behaviour explain variation in survival: A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, K. (1985). Biological image motion processing: A review. Vision Research, 25, 625–660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder, A. (2019). A brain for numbers. The biology of the number instinct. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, C., Fischer, S., Aubin-Horth, N., & Taborsky, B. (2018). Evolutionary conserved neural signature of early life stress affects animal social competence. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2344.

  • Pitcher, T. J. (1993). Behaviour of teleost fishes. Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reebs, S. (2001). Fish Behavior. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rischawy, I., & Schuster, S. (2013). Visual search in hunting archerfish shares all hallmarks of human performance. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, 3096–3103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salwiczek, L. H., Prétôt, L., Demarta, L., Darby Proctor, D., Jennifer Essler, J., Ana, I., Pinto, AI., Sharon Wismer, S., Stoinski, T., Sarah, F., Brosnan, SF., & Bshary, R. (2012). Adult cleaner wrasse outperform capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and orang-utans in a complex foraging task derived from cleaner – client reef fish cooperation. PLOS ONE 77, e49068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049068.

  • Schluessel, V., Beil, O., Weber, T., & Bleckmann, H. (2014). Symmetry perception in bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) and Malawi cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.). Animal Cognition, 17, 1187–1205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schluessel, V., & Bleckmann, H. (2012). Spatial learning and memory retention in the grey bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum). Zoology, 115, 346–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schluessel, V., & Düngen, D. (2015). Irrespective of size, scales, color or body shape all fish are just fish: Object categorization in the grey bamboo shark Chiloscyllium griseum. Animal Cognition, 18, 497–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schluessel, V., Herzog, H., & Scherpestein, M. (2015). Seeing the forest before the trees – spatial orientation in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro) in a hole-board task. Behavioural Processes, 119, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluessel, V., Kortekamp, N., Ortiz Cortes, J. A., Klein, A., & Bleckmann, H. (2015). Perception and discrimination of movement and biological motion patterns in fish. Animal Cognition, 18, 1077–1091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, S. (2012). Fast-starts in hunting fish: Decision-making in small networks of identified neurons. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 279–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, S., Rossel, S., Schmidtmann, A., Jäger, I., & Poralla, J. (2004). Archer fish learn to compensate for complex optical distortions to determine the absolute size of their aerial prey. Current Biology, 14, 1565–1568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, M. C. (2017). The neurobiology of mutalistic behavior: The cleanerfish swims into the spotlight. Frontiers Behav Neurosci, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacho M, Herold C, Rook N, Wagner H, Axer M, Amunts K, Güntürkün O (2020) A cortex-like canonical circuit in the avian forebrain. Science, 369, 1–12. eabc5534. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc5534.

  • Taborsky, M. (1984). Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: Their costs and benefits. Animal Behaviour, 32, 1236–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K., & Ueding, K. (2003). Sailfin molly females (Poecilia latipinna) copy the rejection of a male. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Bleckmann .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bleckmann, H. (2024). Cognitive Abilities of Fish. In: Stupid as a Fish?. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68376-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation