Digital Transformation & Agile Prioritization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Large-Scale Agile Frameworks

Abstract

Digital transformation is the driver of agile prioritization. The central issue in overarching prioritization in the environment of IT projects is the organization and cooperation between the agile teams: How are coordination processes ideally regulated in the agile environment—especially overarching requirements in complex IT systems and software projects? In addition, the question arises as to how—in the case of software development in a functional domain with several technically separate products—the functional sub-aspects of the domain and the technical documentation of the software products mutually complement each other and how such documentation can be created and updated in an agile manner. Agile models for organizing digital transformation: The large-scale agile frameworks presented in this book are the agile models for digital transformation in large organizations. Digital transformation places a variety of demands on organizations and requires a rethinking of organizational structures. Highly specialized teams are in demand, and new tools are desired as working tools for effective communication between teams. Agile collaboration brings new rules of behavior into play and demands an agile mindset from all those involved. Companies that do not use purely standard software products, but rather establish their processes and services on individualized software solutions, face the following challenges when develo** software—as part of complex IT systems: While companies want widely individualized software based on their individual requirements, software manufacturers are interested in largely standardized software products. The dilemma between individualization and efficient standardization results in corresponding prioritization requirements. In this context, Large-Scale Agile Development is designed to cover software architecture, inter-team coordination, portfolio management and scaling in terms of software solutions and organizational structure. A Scaled Agile framework is designed to provide an effective agile organizational model for a complex environment. In particular, it avoids aligning the responsibilities of coordination and information sharing to a single role, but instead provides an exchange between as many team stakeholders as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 46.00
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 58.84
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kreutzer, R. T., Neugebauer, T., & Pattloch, A. (2017). Digital Business Leadership – Digitale Transformation – Geschäftsmodell-Innovation – agile Organisation – Change-Management (1st ed.). Springer/Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wiederhold, L., Zeitner, R., & Peyinghaus, M. (2016). Warum IT-Projekte scheitern. In: Immobilienzeitung, p. 24. ISSN 1433-7878. http://www.htw-berlin.de/forschung/online-forschungskatalog/publikationen/publikation/?eid=9014. Accessed 31 Mar 2020.

  3. Kollmann, T., & Schmidt, H. (2016). Deutschland 4.0 – Wie die Digitale Transformation gelingt (1st ed.). Springer/Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christensen, C. M., & Matzler, K. (2013. Korrigierter Nachdruck in deutscher Übersetzung des amerikanischen Orginalwerks). The innovator’s dilemma: Warum etablierte Unternehmen den Wettbewerb um bahnbrechende Innovationen verlieren (1st ed.). Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (2nd ed.). Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heinemann, G., Gehrckens, M. H., & Wolters, U. J. (2016). Digitale Transformation oder digitale Disruption im Handel – Vom Point-of-Sale zum Point-of-Decision im Digital Commerce (1st ed.). Springer/Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bousonville, T. (2017). Logistik 4.0 – Die digitale Transformation der Wertschöpfungskette (1st ed.). Springer/Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berberich, O. (2016). Trusted Web 4.0 – Konzepte einer digitalen Gesellschaft. Konzepte der Dezentralisierung und Anonymisierung (1st ed.). Springer/Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weinreich, U. (2016). Lean Digitization – Digitale Transformation durch agiles Management (1st ed.). Springer/Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Breyer-Mayländer, T. (2016). Management 4.0-Den digitalen Wandel erfolgreich meistern: Das Kursbuch für Führungskräfte. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. Educause Review, 38, 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2003). IT doesn’t matter – Business processes do: A critical analysis of Nicholas Carr’s IT article in the Harvard business review. Meghan-Kiffer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ebert, C., & Paasivaara, M. (2017). Scaling agile. IEEE Software, 34(6), 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sein, M. K., et al. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uludağ, Ö., et al. (2017). Investigating the role of architects in scaling agile frameworks. In Enterprise distributed object computing conference (EDOC), 2017 IEEE 21st international. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work? – A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9–10), 833–859.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lehto, I., & Rautiainen, K. (2009). Software development governance challenges of a middle-sized company in agile transition. In Software development governance, 2009. SDG’09. ICSE workshop on (pp. 36–39). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wnuk, K., et al. (2016). Supporting scope tracking and visualization for very large-scale requirements engineering-utilizing FSC+, decision patterns, and atomic decision visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 42(1), 47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steinle, C., Eßeling, V., & Eichenberg, T. (Eds.). (2010). Handbuch Multiprojektmanagement und -controlling: Projekte erfolgreich strukturieren und steuern (2nd ed.). Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co KG.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rohner, P. (9 November 2015). Warum scheitern große Projekte? AWF IWI-HSG.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lang, M., Kammerer, S., & Amberg, M. (2012). Projektportfoliomanagement in der IT – Priorisierung, Investition, Steuerung (1st ed.). Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kittlaus, H.-B., & Clough, P. N. (2008). Software product management and pricing: Key success factors for software organizations. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Böhmann, T. (2017). Vorlesungsunterlagen/Foliensätze. Modul Service Lifecycle Management. Stand 09/2017, Universität Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clements, P., & Northrop, L. (2012). Software product lines: practices and patterns (8th ed.). Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Metzger, A., & Pohl, K. (2014). Software product line engineering and variability management: Achievements and challenges. In Proceedings of the on future of software engineering (pp. 70–84). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dehmouch, I. (2014). Towards an agile feature composition for a large scale software product lines. In Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2014 IEEE eighth international conference on (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Baum, H.-G., et al. (2013). Strategisches Controlling (5th ed.). Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jabbari, R., et al. (2016). What is DevOps? A systematic map** study on definitions and practices. In Proceedings of the scientific workshop proceedings of XP2016 (pp. 1–11).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Conboy, K. (2009). Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vigenschow, U. (2015). APM-Agiles Projektmanagement – Anspruchsvolle Softwareprojekte erfolgreich steuern (1st ed.). Dpunkt.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heikkilä, V. T., et al. (2015). Operational release planning in large-scale Scrum with multiple stakeholders-A longitudinal case study at F-Secure Corporation. Information and Software Technology, 57, 116–140.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thiel, G., & Meinke, I. (2018). Agile Statistikbehörde – eine Herausforderung für den strategischen Verbund. In WISTA – Wirtschaft und Statistik. Herausgeber Statistisches Bundesamt, Ausgabe 3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eckstein, J. (2012). Agile Softwareentwicklung in großen Projekten – Teams, Prozesse und Technologien für den Wandel im Unternehmen (2. Aufl.). dpunkt.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gunasekaran, A. (2001). Agile manufacturing: The 21st century competitive strategy (1st ed.). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Uludağ, Ö., et al. (2017). Investigating the role of architects in scaling agile frameworks. In Enterprise distributed object computing conference (EDOC), 2017 IEEE 21st international (pp. 125 ff.). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Friedli, T. (2006). Technologiemanagement: Modelle zur Sicherung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit (1st ed.). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paypal schließt einen Pakt mit Google. (10. Oktober 2018). Süddeutsche Zeitung. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/mobiles-bezahlen-paypalschliesst-einen-pakt-mit-google-1.4164040. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.

  42. Apple Pay: Teilnehmende Banken in Europa und dem Nahen Osten. https://support.apple.com/de-de/HT206637. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.

  43. Prescher, H. (2015). Projektmanagement, aber richtig – Der Weg aus der Kapazitätsfalle. Ein Leitfaden für Organisation, Kommunikation und Führung in Projekten (1st ed.). tredition.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chin, R., & Benne, K. D. (1969). General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. Human Relations Center, Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wie wir arbeiten (wollen). (2016). Werkheft 02 in der Reihe Arbeit weiter denken, Initiative Arbeiten 4.0, Herausgeber: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, Stand August 2016. https://www.arbeitenviernull.de/fileadmin/Downloads/BMAS_Werkheft-2.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2021.

  46. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed 7 Aug 2021.

  47. Gustavsson, T. (2017). Assigned roles for Inter-team coordination in Large-Scale Agile Development: A literature review. In Proceedings of the XP2017 scientific workshops (p. 15). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dingsøyr, T., & Moe, N. B. (2014). Towards principles of large-scale agile development (May 2014). In: Agile methods: Large-scale development, refactoring, testing, and estimation, XP 2014 international workshops, revised selected papers, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Block .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Block, S. (2023). Digital Transformation & Agile Prioritization. In: Large-Scale Agile Frameworks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67782-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67782-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-67781-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-67782-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation