Language and Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • 191 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter asks to what extent similar principles of language use can be found in all cultures and to what extent there are culture-specific communicative basic structures. The answer to this question is complicated insofar as language is part of culture and, like culture, must be acquired by the individual in the course of his or her own development. Thus, the first question is to what extent the respective mother tongue imposes restrictions on the individual with regard to certain patterns of thought and forms of communication. To investigate this question, known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, neither a systematic comparison of language systems nor an absolute comparison of language use is sufficient. It is only possible to separate linguistic conventions from real cultural differences if the intracultural variation in different situations is also taken into account. Relatively consistent statements can just be made concerning the individualism-collectivism factor. Here it can be stated that in collectivistic compared to individualistic cultures, speaking is characterised by a stronger self-restraint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bickerton, D. (1999). Creole languages, the language bioprogram hypothesis, and language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 195–220). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühler, K. (1990). The Theory of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamin's Publishing Company..

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2000). Genes, Peoples, and Languages. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1998). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1999). On the nature, use, and acquisition of language. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 33–54). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallois, C., & Callan, V. (1997). Communication and culture: A guide for practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., & Heath, J. (1998). Sex, sound symbolism, and sociolinguistics. Current Anthropology, 39 (4), 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graumann, C. F. (1972). Interaktion und Kommunikation. In C. F. Graumann, L. Kruse & B. Kroner (eds.), Sozialpsychologie. 2. Halbband: Forschungsbereiche (pp. 1109–1262). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günthner, S. (1996). Male-female speaking practices across cultures. In M. Hellinger, & U. Ammon (Eds.), Contrastive sociolinguistics (pp. 447–473). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T., & Grabowski, J. (1994). Sprechen. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10 (3), 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. (1993). Normen kreieren – Normen variieren. Männliches und weibliches Sprechen in einer madadassischen Gemeinschaft. In: S. Günthner, & H. Kotthoff (Eds.), Von fremden Stimmen: weibliches und männliches Sprechen im Kulturvergleich (2nd ed.; pp. 75–100). Frankfurt (M.): Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, C., Thanavishuth, C., Chulalongkorn U., Burnham, D., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2002). Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: Pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 372–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., & Ishii, K. (2002). Word and voice: Spontaneous attention to emotional utterances in two languages. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change, In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns (pp. 122–142). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenmayr, A. (1997). Sprachpsychologie: Ein Lehrbuch. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. Z. (2001). Cooperative and intrusive interruptions in inter- and intracultural dyadic discourse. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 20, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Y. (2003). Sprachroutinen und Vermeidungsrituale im Chinesischen. In A. Thomas (Ed.), Psychologie interkulturellen Handelns (2nd ed., pp. 247–268). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin-Huber, M. A. (1998). Kulturspezifischer Spracherwerb: Sprachliche Sozialisation und Kommunikation im Kulturvergleich. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Monroe.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz von Thun, F. (1999). Miteinander reden: Psychologie der Kommunikation. Sonderausgabe. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt TB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G., & Zwier, S. (1997). Social cognition. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. 3: Social behavior and applications (2nd ed., pp. 51–75). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Helversen, O., & Scherer, K. R. (1988). Nonverbale Kommunikation. In K. Immelmann, K. R. Scherer, C. Vogel & P. Schmoock (Eds.), Psychobiologie – Grundlagen des Verhaltens (S. 609–647). Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Humboldt, W. (1988). Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechtes. In A. Flitner & K. Giel (Hrsg.), W. von Humboldt, Werke in fünf Bänden, Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie (6. Aufl.). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (2015). Some Tentative Axioms of Communication. In P. Watzlawick, W. J. Lederer, & D. D. Jackson (eds.), Pragmatics of Human Communication - A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Helfrich, H. (2023). Language and Communication. In: Cross-Cultural Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67558-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation