Zusammenfassung
Das Handlungsfeld der räumlichen Planung als Schnittstelle zwischen zukunftsorientierter Lösung komplexer Probleme ist Arena ethisch-moralischer Orientierungen und Ausrichtungen. Doch Planer:innen können diese ethischen Entscheidungen nicht alleine treffen. Gerade die Orientierung auf ein Gemeinwohl bedürfen in diesem Sinne einer weiteren Ausdifferenzierung.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Allmendinger P (2017) Planning theory. Palgrave, London
Appiah KA (2006) Cosmopolitanism: ethics in a world of strangers. Lane, London
Arendt H (1958) The human condition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Aristoteles (ca. 335–323 v. Chr. [1985]) Nikomachische Ethik. Felix Meiner, Hamburg
Barker G, Kitcher P (2014) Philosophy of science – a new introduction. Oxford University Press, New York
Beatley T (1989) Environmental ethics and planning theory. J Plan Lit 4(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541228900400101
Behrend L, Levin-Keitel M (2020) Planning as scientific discipline? Digging deep toward the bottom line of the debate. Plann Theor 19(3):306–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219897283
Berr K (2017) Architektur- und Planungsethik. Zugänge, Perspektive Standpunkte. Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Campbell H (2012) Planning to change the world: between knowledge and action lies synthesis. J Plan Educ Res 32(2):135–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11436347
Davoudi S (2015) Planning as practice of knowing. Plann Theor 14(3):316–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919
Dewey J (1954) The public and its problems. Swallow Press/Ohio University Press, Athens
Faludi A (1987) A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Flyvbjerg B (1998) Rationality and power: democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making social science matter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Forester J (1982) Planning in the face of power. J Am Plann Assoc 48(1):67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167
Forester J (1989) Planning in the face of power. University of California Press, Berkeley
Forester J (1993) Critical theory, public policy and planning practice. State University of New York Press, New York
Forester J (1999) The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning progresses. MIT Press, Cambridge
Forester J (2012) On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Plann Theor 12(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212448750
Foucault M (1977) Überwachen und Strafen – die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Foucault M (1980) l´ Impossible Prison. Manuskript einer Diskussionsrunde, 20 May 1978 (ed. M. Perrot). Seuil, Paris
Freeman R (2007) Epistemological bricolage: how practitioners make sense of learning. Administration and Society 39(4):476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707301857
Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Healey P (1996) The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environ Plann B Plann Des 23(2):217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217
Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning. Sha** places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, New York
Innes JE (1995) Planning theory´s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice. J Plann Educ Res 14(3):183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307
Innes JE, Booher DE (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. J Am Plann Assoc 65(4):412–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
Innes JE, Booher DE (2010) Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge, London
Kant I: Kant's gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg. von der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [=AA]. G. Reimer, Berlin, 1900 ff.
Lendi M, Hübler KH (2004) Ethik in der Raumplanung. Zugänge und Reflexionen. (Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL, 221). Verlag der ARL, Hannover
Lutz-Bachmann M (2013) Grundkurs Philosophie. Bd. 7: Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart
Mattila H (2020) Habermas revisited: resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory. Prog Plann 141(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.001
Meyerson M, Banfield EC (1955) Politics, planning and the public interest – the case of public housing in Chicago. Free Press, New York
Poser H (2012) Wissenschaftstheorie. Eine philosophische Einführung. Reclam, Stuttgart
Röd W (1994) Der Weg der Philosophie. Bd. 1: Altertum, Mittelalter Renaissance. Beck, München
Sager T (1992) Why plan? A multi-rationality foundation for planning. Scandinavian Housing and Plann Res 9(3):129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739208730300
Sager T (1994) Communicative planning theory. Ashgate, Farnham
Sager T (2013) Reviving critical planning theory. Routledge, London
Schön DA (1991) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Arena (Ashgate), Aldershot
Singer P (1979) Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Strauss AL (1966) Continual permutation of action. Transaction publishers, Piscataway
Wittgenstein L (1989) Über Gewißheit - Werkausgabe Band 8. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levin-Keitel, M., Behrend, L. (2022). Werteorientierung in der räumlichen Planung. In: Die Topologie der Planungstheorien . Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65224-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65224-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65223-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65224-4
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)