Zusammenfassung
Die epistemologische Frage nach dem Wissen der räumlichen Planung lässt sich in Wissen über Gegenwärtiges und Zukünftiges ausdrücken. Planungstheorien spiegeln die Ambivalenz der essenziellen Zukunftsorientierung planerischen Wissens und der Bedeutung der Normativität dieses Wissens wider.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Alexander ER (2001) What do planners need to know? J Plan Educ Res 20(3):376–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102000309
Alexander ER (2016) There is no planning – only planning practices: notes for spatial planning theories. Plann Theor 15(1):91–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215594617
Allmendinger P (2017) Planning theory. Palgrave, London
Amin A, Roberts J (2008) Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice. Res Policy 37(2):353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
Aristoteles (1975) Lehre vom Schluß oder die erste Analytik [1921]. Felix Meiner, Hamburg
Ayer AJ (1936) Language truth and logic. Gollancz, London
Bacon F (1990) Novum organum [1620]. Felix Meiner, Hamburg
Barker G, Kitcher P (2014) Philosophy of science – a New Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York
Behrend L, Levin-Keitel M (2020) Planning as scientific discipline? Digging deep toward the bottom line of the debate. Plann Theor 19(3):306–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219897283
Campbell H (2012) Planning to change the world: between knowledge and action lies synthesis. J Plann Educ Res 32(2):135–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11436347
Carnap R (1928) Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Erste Auflage 1928, Zweite unveränderte Auflage 1961. Felix Meiner, Hamburg
Comesaña J, Klein P (2019) Skepticism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/skepticism/. Zugegriffen: 22. Jan. 2021
Chugh R, Wibowo S, Srimannarayana G (2015) Mandating the Transfer of Tacit Knowledge in Australian Universities. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.5171/2015.297669
Dalton L (2007) Preparing planners for the breadth of practice. J Am Plann Assoc 73(1):35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708976135
Davoudi S (2006) Evidence-based planning: rhetoric and reality. disP: Plann Rev 165(2):14–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951
Davoudi S (2015) Planning as practice of knowing. Plann Theor 14(3):316–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919
Descartes R (1960) Von der Methode des richtigen Verstandesgebrauchs und der wissenschaftlichen Forschung [1637]. Felix Meiner, Hamburg
Descartes R (2009) Meditationen [1641]. Felix Meiner, Hamburg
Detel W (2014) Grundkurs Philosophie. Bd. 4, Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie. Reclam, Stuttgart
Dupré J (1993) The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Evans R, Marvin S (2006) Researching the sustainable city: three models of interdisciplinarity. Environ Plan A 38(6):1009–1028. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37317
Faludi A, Waterhout B (2006) Introducing evidence-based planning. disP 42(165):4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2006.10556950
Feyerabend P (1975) Against method. Verso, London
Fischler R (1995) Strategy and history in professional planning, planning as world making. In: Liggett H, Perry D (Hrsg) Spatial practices. SAGE, London
Flyvbjerg B (1998) Rationality and power: democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Forester J (1989) Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley
Foucault M (1971) Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Foucault M (1977) Überwachen und Strafen – die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gibbons M, Nowotny H, Limoges C, Trow M, Schwartzmann S, Scott P (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London
Guignon CB (1991) Pragmatism or hermeneutics? Epistemology after foundationalism. In: Hiley DR, Bohman J, Shusterman R (Hrsg) The interpretive turn: philosophy, science, culture. Cornell University Press, New York
Healey P (1996) The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environ Plann B 23(2):217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217
Hoyningen-Huene P (2013) Systematicity – the nature of science. Oxford University Press, New York
Hügli A, Lübcke P (2000) Wahrheit. In: Hügli A, Lübcke P (Hrsg) Philosophielexikon. Rowohlt, Hamburg
Innes J (2004) Consensus building: clarifications for the critics. Plann Theor 3(1):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095204042315
Kitcher P (1982) Abusing science. MIT Press, Cambridge
Kitcher P (1993) The advancement of science. Oxford University Press, New York
Kuhn TS (2012) The structure of scientific revolution [1962]. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn TS (1970) The logic discovery or the psychology of research? In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (Hrsg) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, S 1–24
Lakatos I (1978) The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press, New York
Laudan L (1983) The demise of the demarcation problem. In: Cohen RS, Laudan R (Hrsg) Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis. Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum. Reidel, Dordrecht, S 111–127
Legg C, Hookway C (2020) Pragmatism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/pragmatism/. Zugegriffen: 22. Jan. 2021
Lindblom CE, Cohen DK (1979) Usable knowledge: social science and social problem solving. Yale University Press, New Haven
Merton Robert K. (1937) The Sociology of Knowledge. Isis 27(3):493–503. https://doi.org/10.1086/347276
Newbold D, Roberts J (2007) An analysis of the demarcation problem in science and its applications to therapeutic touch theory. Int J Nurs Pract 13(6):324–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2007.00646.x
Office of the deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004) Planning policy statement 12: local development framework. ODPM, London
Park S (2016) To be scientific is to be interactive. Eur J Sci Theol 12(1):77–86
Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London
Popper K (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Random House, New York
Resnik DB (2000) A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem. Stud Hist Philos Sci 31(2):249–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00004-2
Rip A (2003) Constructing expertise: in a third wave of science studies? Soc Stud Sci 33(3):419–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333006
Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rode P (2018) Urban infrastructure in transport studies and planning (Research Note 02). Governing Infrastructure Interfaces, September. https://files.lsecities.net/files/2018/09/Governing-Infrastructure-Interfaces_Urban-Infrastructure-in-Transport-Studies-and-Planning-PhilippRode.pdf. Zugegriffen: 29. Juli. 2021
Ruse M (1982) Pro judice. Sci, Technol, Human Values 7(41):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398200700403
Rydin Y (2003) Conflict, consensus and rationality in environmental planning: an institutional discourse approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rydin Y (2007) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Plann Theor 6(1):52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161
Sandercock L (1998) Towards cosmopolis. Wiley, London
Sartori I, Napolitano A, Voss K (2012) Net zero energy buildings: a consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings 48:220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.032
Schülein JA, Reitze S (2012) Wissenschaftstheorie für Einsteiger [Philosophy of science for beginners]. UTB, Wien
Tewdwr-Jones M, Allmendinger P (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of habermasian collaborative planning. Environ Plan A 30(11):1975–1989. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301975
Thagard P (1988) Computational philosophy of science. MIT Press, Cambridge
Ziman J (1968) Public knowledge. Cambridge University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levin-Keitel, M., Behrend, L. (2022). Wissen über Planungswissen. In: Die Topologie der Planungstheorien . Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65224-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65224-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65223-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65224-4
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)