Ausbildung und Training

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atemwegsmanagement
  • 629 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Atemwegssicherung mit dem Ziel der adäquaten Oxygenierung und Decarboxylierung gehört zu einer der wichtigsten ärztlichen Akuttherapien. Mehrfache Versuche der direkten Laryngoskopie sowie missglückte Intubationsversuche sind oft mit Sauerstoffunterversorgung, Arrhythmien, Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand, hypoxischer Hirnschädigung und Tod verbunden. Mit einer schwierigen Maskenbeatmung muss in einem Kollektiv von Elektivpatienten mit 2 % gerechnet werden. Die Inzidenz der schwierigen direkten Laryngoskopie liegt zwischen 1,5–8,0 %. Die Unmöglichkeit zur Beatmung als sog. unerwartete „cannot intubate, cannot ventilate“-Situation wird mit einer Wahrscheinlichkeit von 0,008 % (1:13.000) bis 0,004 % (1:25.000) angegeben. Fehlgeschlagene Intubationen mit nachfolgenden Unmöglichkeiten zur Beatmung zählen zu den häufigsten Komplikationen im Atemwegsmanagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF et al. (2013) Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) Perioperative Clinical Research Committee. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology 119:1360–1369

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C (2011) Fourth National Audit P. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 106:617–631

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J et al. (2011) Fourth National Audit P. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: Intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth 106:632–642

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krautter M, Weyrich P, Schultz JH et al. (2011) Effects of Peyton’s four-step approach on objective performance measures in technical skills training: a controlled trial. Teach Learn Med 23(3):244–250

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hensel M, Schmidbauer W, Benker M et al. (2017) Comparative assessment of three approaches of teaching nonmedically trained persons in the handling of supraglottic airways: a randomized controlled trial. Mil Med 182:e1774–e1781

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hofer A, Rehatschek R. https://www.medunigraz.at/fileadmin/lehren/planenorganisieren/pdf/Booklet_Kurzuebersicht_LVformate.pdf

  7. http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/001-028l_S1_Atemwegsmanagement_2015

  8. Grande B, Kolbe M, Biro P (2017) Difficult airway management and training: Simulation, communication, and feedback. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 30:743–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buis ML, Maissan IM, Hoeks SE, Klimek M, Stolker RJ (Feb 2016) Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: A systematic review Resuscitation 99:63–71. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 19

  10. Kennedy CC, Cannon EK, Warner DO et al. (2014) Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Crit Care Med 42:42

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sun Y, Pan C, Li T, Gan TJ (2017) Airway management education: simulation based training versus nonsimulation based training—A systematic review and meta analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 17:17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF et al. (2015) Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth 115:827–848

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herbstreit F, Fassbender P, Haberl H et al. (2011) Learning endotracheal intubation using a novel videolaryngoscope improves intubation skills of medical students. Anesth Analg 113:586–590

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howard-Quijano KJ, Huang YM et al (2008) Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth 101:568–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sainsbury J Telgarsky B, Parotto M et al. (2017) The effect of verbal and video feedback on learning direct laryngoscopy among novice laryngoscopists: A randomized pilot study Can. J Anesth 64:252–259

    Google Scholar 

  16. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH et al. (2014) A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ 48:375–385

    Google Scholar 

  17. Myatra SN, Kalkundre RS, Divatia JV (2017) Optimizing education in difficult airway management: Meeting the challenge. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 30:748–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Watkins SC, Roberts DA, Boulet JR et al. (2017) Evaluation of a simpler tool to assess nontechnical skills during simulated critical events. Simul Healthc 12:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J et al. (2016) Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(11):CD011136

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abdelgadir IS, Phillips RS, Singh D et al. (2017) Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(5):CD011413

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eismann H, Sieg L, Etti N et al. (2017) Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins. Eur J Med Res 10;22(1):27

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pieters BMA, Maas EHA, Knape JTA et al. (2017) Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 72(12):1532–1541

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cook TM, Boniface NJ, Seller C et al. (2018) Universal videolaryngoscopy: a structured approach to conversion to videolaryngoscopy for all intubations in an anaesthetic and intensive care department. Br J Anaesth 120(1):173–180

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim H, So E, Karm MH et al. (2017) Learning fiberoptic intubation for awake nasotracheal intubation. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 17(4):297–305

    Google Scholar 

  25. Collins SR, Blank BS (2014) Fiberoptic intubation: an overview and update. Respir Care 59(6):865–880

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee HM, Sakong J, Jee DL (2013) The comparison of feasibility and safety on fiberoptic guided intubation under conscious sedation with remifentanil and propofol. Korean J Anesthesiol 65(3):215–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hartmut Bürkle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bürkle, H. (2023). Ausbildung und Training. In: Dörges, V., Byhahn, C. (eds) Atemwegsmanagement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54572-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54572-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54571-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54572-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation