SpringerLink
Log in

Ecosystem Service Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Ecology Research in China

Abstract

With the development of the ecology research, the in-depth understanding of the characteristics of different types of ecological systems, ecosystem observation techniques progress, all kinds of ecosystem observation data to accumulate, an value analysis and evaluation of the ecosystem make it possible for understanding the ecological system evolution and discussing the sustainable development of ecosystem. All parts of the ecosystem including humans and their environment, ecosystem provide all kinds of ecological services to human through the process of its function. Ecosystem services (ESs) is considered as no value by the existing economic model and theory for a long time, only part of the ecological products have the market price, in order to obtain tangible ESs, human damage or even destroy some invisible ecological services at the same time, led to a decline in ESs. Since the mid-1990s, the Chinese ecologists widely study the ESs and its value assessment research, contenting forest, grassland, wetland , farmland, and marine ecosystems. Through the general laws of ecological service value method and the time spatial heterogeneity of ESs space model method, we assess the ESs value in whole and reflect its spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Value assessment method of ESs is develo** constantly, widely used in the main are valued based on the price per unit area, based on the function of laws of value and dynamic laws of value based on the single function time three types. Three methods are widely adopted, they are based on the price per unit area, based on the function of laws of value, dynamic laws of value based on the single function time. In a new paradigm to investigate the relationship between ecosystem and economic system, so as to promote an efficient economic decisions for resource allocation in the economic system and ecological system of integrated system framework. To cultivate and develop effective market mechanism for ecological service has become one of the hot spot of ecological service research and ecosystem management. Researching on ESs consumption and building ecological system efficient continuous consumption mode, we can hold the direction of the rational utilization of ecological system, and it is of great practical significance to safeguard the ecological safety. On the basis of understanding the principle of ecosystem consumption and consumption measurement model, analyzing consumption process, analyzing consumption utility function (UF), and analyzing the consumption process, we can realize ESs, and this provide a scientific basis to optimize the structure of consumption of ESs, and to build efficient continuous consumption patterns (CPs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger, N., Brown, K., Cervigni, R., & Moran, D. (1995). Total economic value of forests in Mexico. Ambio, 24(5), 286–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anielski, M., & Wilson, S. (2005). Counting Canada’s natural capital: Assessing the real value of Canada’s boreal ecosystems. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Boreal Initiative and Pembina Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., et al. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment. Science, 268, 520–521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canton, Y., Domingo, F., Sole-Benet, A., & Puigdefábregas, J. (2001). Hydrological and erosion response of a badlands system in semiarid SE Spain. Journal of Hydrology, 252, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agardc, J., Capistranod, D., DeFriese, R., Díazf, S., et al. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1305–1312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannons, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and nature. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merlo M., & Croitoru, L. (2005). Valuing mediterranean forests: Towards total economic value. Wallingford: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural systems. Washington, D. C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C., & Matson, P. A. (2008). Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1(05), 9455–9456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C., Soderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P., et al. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289(5478), 395–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description, and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J., Bao, C., & Shu, T. (2006). Analysis on the balance between supply and consumption of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(6), 2001–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). (2010). Global forest resources assessment. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, S., Peng, Z., & Zhou, J. (2004). A discussion on the compensation of forest ecological benefit. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 40, 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., Turner, K. M., Zylstra, M., Brouwer, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., et al. (2008). Ecosystem services and economic theory: Integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications, 18, 2050–2067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309, 570–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C., & Mooney, P. (1990). Shattering: Food, politics and the loss of genetic diversity. Tucson, USA: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemminga, M.A., & Duarte, C.M. (2000) Seagrass ecology. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmlund, C., & Hammer, M. (1999). Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecological Economics, 29, 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2004). 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: A global species assessment. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, W., Min, Q., Cheng, S., Zhen, L., & Liu, X. (2010). Measurement of ecosystem services consumption: a case study of the traditional agricultural area in Congjiang County of Guizhou Province. Acta Ecological Sinica, 30(11), 2846–2855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köel-Knabner, I., Amelung, W., Cao, Z., Fiedlerd, S., Frenzele, P., Jahnf, R., et al. (2010). Biogeochemistry of paddy soils. Geoderma, 157, 1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, D. J. (2001). The economic value of forest ecosystem services: A review. Washington, D.C., USA: Wilderness Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2008). The assessment theory, methods and application of ecosystem service value. Bei**g: Renmin University of China Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Ouyang, Z., & Zhao, J. (2002). Study of ecosystem services. Bei**g: Meteorological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, X., Chen, Y., Li, H., Tian, G., Ni, W., He, M., & Zhang, Z. (2007). Modeling transport and fate of nitrogen from urea applied to a near-trench paddy field. Environmental Pollution, 150, 313–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (2004). Carbon stock and GHG emission of wetland ecosystem. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 24(5), 634–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. (2005). Wetlands landscape changes and the environmental effects. Bei**g: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. (2007). Water storage and flood regulation functions of marsh wetland in the Sanjiang Plain. Wetland Science, 5(1), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C. L., et al. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Dong, G., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., & Jiang, M. (2013). Contribution to the global warming mitigation of marshlands conversion to croplands in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Clean-Soil Air Water, 41(4), 319–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Lu, X., Jiang, M., Shang, L., & Wang, X. (2008). Research on the valuation of wetland ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinca, 28(11), 5625–5631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., & Covich, A. (2000). Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics, 33(1), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J. P., Hector, A., et al. (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. (2004). Wetlands ecosystem conservation and management. Bei**g: Chemical Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. A., Wilcox, B. P., Breshears, D. D., Tongway, D. J., & Imeson, A. (2005). Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology, 86(2), 288–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, X. (2009). Consumption of ecosystem goods and services: With a case study in **ghe Watershed of northwestern China. Bei**g: Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Lu, X., & Yang, Q. (1996). The carbon cycle of Sanjiang Plain. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 16(4), 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • MälerK, G., Aniyar, S., & Jansson, Ã…. (2008). Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9501–9506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, M. J., Bienes, R., Perez-Rodriguez, R., & Jimenez, L. (2008). Soil degradation in central Spain due to sheet water erosion by low-intensity rainfall events. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33(3), 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A. L., Kauppi, P. E., Angelstam, P. K., Zhang, Y., & Tikka, P. M. (2005). Importing timber, exporting ecological impact. Science, 308, 359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, W.V., Mittermeier, R.A., & Werner, T.B. (1990) Conserving the World’s Biological Diversity. Washington, D.C.: IUCN, WRI, WWF and World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R., & Balick, M. (1995). The value of undiscovered pharmaceuticals in tropical forests. Economic Botany, 49(2), 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., & Tangley, L. (1991). Trees of life: Saving tropical forests and their biological wealth. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, Q., **e, G., Hu, D., Shen, L., & Yan, M. (2004). Service valuation of grassland ecosystem in Qinghai province. Resource Science, 26(3), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, H. A., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1997). Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history. In G. C. Daily (Ed.), Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, D. C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem, S., & Li, S. (1997). Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature, 390, 507–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/IUCN. (1996). Guidelines for aid agencies for improved conservation and sustainable use of tropical and sub-tropical Wetlands. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Z. (2007). China’s ecological construction and sustainable development (in general program for China’s sustainable development) (Vol. 11). Bei**g: Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Z., & Wang, R. (2000). Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. World Sci-tech Research and Development, 22(5), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Z., Wang, X., & Miao, H. (1999a). A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(5), 607–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Z., Wang, R., & Zhao, J. (1999b). Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 10(5), 635–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, (1999). Study on carbon reservoir in soils of China. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 15(5), 330–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz, W. A., et al. (2011). A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333, 988–993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. (1998). Can non-market values save the tropical forests? In B. Goldsmith (Ed.), Tropical rain forest: A wider perspective. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. (1999). Can non-market values save the world’s forests? In S. Roper & A. Park (Eds.), The living forest: The non-market benefits of forestry. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, B., & Hong, H. (2006). Evaluation on coastal ecosystem services-theory and applied research. Bei**g: China Ocean Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., & Kounang, N. (1998). Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystems, 1, 416–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J., Costanza, R., Sandhu, H., Sigsgaard, L., & Wratten, S. (2009). The value of producing food, energy, and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem. Ambio, 38, 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. (1992). Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economic leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R., & Case, B. (2008). The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land: An experimental approach. Ecological Economics, 64, 835–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCBD. (2008). Subsidiary body on scientific, technical and technological advice (13/3): In-depth review of the expanded programme of work for forest biological diversity. Accessed at http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-13/official/ sbstta-13-03-en.pdf

  • Shen, M. (2008). Eco-economics. Bei**g: China Environmental Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Zheng, W., Ding, D., & Lv, J. (2009a). Valuation and ecosystem services of typical island. Marine Environmental Sciences, 28(6), 743–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Zheng, W., Ding, D., Lv, J., & Zhang, X. (2008). Valuation of typical marine ecosystem services—A case study in Sanggou Bay. Marine Environmental Sciences, 27(2), 100–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Zheng, W., Wang, Z., & Ding, D. (2009b). Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of regional marine ecosystem services value. Journal of Ocean University of China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research), 8(2), 150–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • State Forestry Administration. (2009a). The seventh national forest inventory (2004–2008). Bei**g: China Forestry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Forestry Administration. (2009b). China forestry statistical year book 2008. Bei**g: China Forestry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., Lester, S., Black, W., Fyfe, M., & Raverty, S. (2002) Multispecies outbreak of cryptococcosis on southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 43, 792–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., & Chen, L. (2006). A study of policies and legislation affecting payments for watershed services in China. London, UK: Research Center of Ecological and Environmental Economics Bei**g, and International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinton, S. M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. P., & Hamilton, S. K. (2007). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics, 64, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., et al. (2001). Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 292, 281–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torras, M. (2000). The total economic value of Amazonian deforestation, 1978–1993. Ecological Economics, 33, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K., Bateman, I. J., & Adger, W. N. (2001). Economics of coastal and water resources: Valuing environmental functions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., & Georgiou, S. (2003). Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uk, N. E. A. (2011). National ecosystem assessment: Synthesis of the key findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R., & Repcheck, J. (2006). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach (6th ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. H., Bardgett, R. D., & Kelly, E. F. (2010). Biodiversity in the dark. Nature Geoscience, 3, 297–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. (2005). Japanese compensation systems for forest ecological benefits and recent implementation. World Forestry Research, 18, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Liu, X., Li, H., & Duan, Z. (2005). Discussion on the price theory of marine ecological resources. Marine Sciences, 29(1), 43–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., & Yang, F. (2008). Specification for assessment of forest ecosystem services in China. Bei**g: Chinese Standard Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • WGMEA (Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2003a). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WGMEA (Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2003b). Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WGMEA (Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2003c). Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S., Sebastian, K., & Scherr, S. J. (2000). Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: Agroecosystems. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute and World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. (2006). The functional assessment on mangrove ecosystem services in Guanxi province and their value evaluation. Guilin, Guangxi: Guanxi Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • **ao, Y., An, K., **e, G., & Lu, C. (2011). Evaluation of ecosystem services provided by 10 typical rice paddies in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2, 328–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • **ao, Y., & **e, G. (2009). Comprehensive valuation of the ecosystem services of rice paddies in Shanghai. Resources Sciences, 31, 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • **ao, Y., **e, G., Lu, C., Ding, X., & Lv, Y. (2004). The gas regulation function of rice paddy ecosystems and its value. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(5), 617–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • ** system. Agricultural Sciences in China, 9, 528–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **e, G., Lu, C., & Leng, Y. (2003). Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(2), 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • **e, G., **ao, Y., & Zhen, L. (2005). Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture, 3, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • **e, G., Zhang, Y., Lu, C., Zheng, D., & Cheng, S. (2001). Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(1), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • **e, G., Zhen, L., Lu, C., **ao, Y., & Chen, C. (2008). Expert based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resource, 23(5), 911–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Li, W., Min, Q., & Xu, Q. (2005). Research on change in value of ecosystem services in **lin river basin. Journal of Natural Resources, 20(1), 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Zhang, Z., Cheng, G., Su, Z., Lu, A., Lin, Q., & Zhang, H. (2002). Measuring the total economic value of restoring E**a Banner’s ecosystem services. Acta Geographica Sinica, 57(1), 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Zheng, D., & Feng, S. (2007). Value evaluation of negative external effect in Bei**g city farmland production. China Environmental Science, 27, 29–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, N., Nagao, N., & Misawa, S. (2010). Evaluation of the flood mitigation effect of a paddy field dam project. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., Lu, C., & **e, G. (2005). Progress in ecosystem services of grassland. Resource Science, 27(6), 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Ouyang, Z., & Zheng, H. (2007). Spatial scale characteristics of ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26(9), 1432–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Shi, H., Jiang, Z., & Ding, D. (2006). Sources and implementation of marine ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(12), 1574–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., & Ouyang, Z. (2004). Evaluation of forest ecosystem services and their value in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(4), 480–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., Ouyang, Z., Jia, L., & Zheng, H. (2003). Ecosystem services and their valuation of China grassland. Acta Ecology Sinica, 24(6), 1101–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Wen, Q., & Ai, J. (2010). Ecosystem service value of forests in Yunnan Province. Forest Research, 23, 184–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., **ao, H., & Wu, G. (2000). Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 11(2), 290–292.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhen, L., Lui, X., & Wei, Y. (2008). Consumption of ecosystem services: Models, measurement and management framework. Resources Science, 30(1), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen, L., Ochirbat, B., Lv, Y., Wei, Y., Liu, X., Chen, J., et al. (2010). Comparing patterns of ecosystem service consumption and perceptions of range management between ethnic herders in Inner Mongolia and Mongolia. Environmental Research Letters, 5(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W., Shi, H., Chen, S., & Ding, D. (2006). Perception to ecosystem service function on the view point of welfare economics. Ecological Economy, 5, 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W., Shi, H., Chen, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., & Ding, D. (2007). Perception of the characters of marine ecological asset and its value. Marine Environmental Sciences, 26(4), 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W., Shi, H., Chen, S., & Zhu, M. (2009a). Benefit and cost analysis of mariculture based on ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 6(8), 626–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Wang, K., Zhao, M., Han, G., & Feng, Y. (2009b). Primary evaluation of the indirect value on rangeland ecosystem services in Northern agro-pastoral ecotone: A case study in Taipusi banner and buan league. Pratacultural Science, 26(9), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei**g, 100101, China

    Gaodi **e, Shuyan Cao, Yu **ao, **a Pei, Yanying Bai, Wenhua Li, Qingwen Min, Chunxia Lu, Jiyuan Liu, Lin Zhen & Moucheng Liu

  2. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environmental and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Bei**g, 100091, China

    Bing Wang & **ang Niu

  3. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China

    **aohui Liu

  4. Forestry College, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, 071000, China

    Zhongqi Xu

  5. The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration of China, Qingdao, 266061, China

    Honghua Shi, Wei Zheng & Dewen Ding

  6. Bei**g Normal University, Bei**g, 100875, China

    **yan Zhan

  7. Urban Planning and Design Institute, Tsinghua University, Bei**g, 100084, China

    Li Yang

  8. Bei**g Tourism Planning and Design Institute Davos Summit, Bei**g, 100101, China

    Xuelin Liu

Authors
  1. Gaodi **e
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuyan Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu **ao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. **a Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanying Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wenhua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. **ang Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. **aohui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhongqi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Qingwen Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Chunxia Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Honghua Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Wei Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Dewen Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jiyuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. **yan Zhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Lin Zhen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Li Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Xuelin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Moucheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moucheng Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Bei**g, China

    Wenhua Li

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and Higher Education Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

**e, G. et al. (2015). Ecosystem Service Evaluation. In: Li, W. (eds) Contemporary Ecology Research in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48376-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation