Vision and Maturity Model for Digitized Project Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digitalization in companies

Abstract

Project management software has been a standard tool in projects for years. Current software solutions focus primarily on planning and progress control in projects as well as communication between project stakeholders.

However, digitization enables further advanced applications, e.g. through machine learning. This makes it possible to better support decisions in projects or to automate activities of project managers. Two examples are the tailoring of the project management method and automated scenario planning.

Accordingly, this paper draws the vision of a digitized project management, which in particular uses machine learning methods and goes far beyond the currently widespread use of digital tools. In order to make this vision tangible and to show ways to achieve it, the maturity model M2DIP is presented. This maturity model enables both the determination of one’s own position and the derivation of a development path for digitalized project management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 52.74
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bendel O Definition “Digitalisierung”. In: Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  2. Timinger H, Seel C (2017) Ein adaptives Vorgehensmodell für hybrides Projektmanagement. In: Barton T, Herrmann F, Meister VG et al (Hrsg) Prozesse, Technologie, Anwendungen, Systeme und Management 2017: Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 1. Aufl. mana-Buch, Heide/Holst, S 20–29

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seel C (2010) Reverse Method Engineering: Methode und Softwareunterstützung zur Konstruktion und Adaption semiformaler Informationsmodellierungstechniken. Wirtschaftsinformatik – Theorie und Anwendung, Bd 20. Logos, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J et al (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Österle H, Becker J, Frank U et al (2010) Memorandum zur gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatik. Schmalenbachs Z Betriebswirtsch Forsch 62(6):664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CMMI (2018) CMMI Institute. http://cmmiinstitute.com//. Accessed on 08.01.2018

  7. Crosby PB (1979) Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Software Engineering Institute (2011) CMMI für Entwicklung, Version 1.3. https://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/assets/whitepapers/10tr033de_v11.pdf/. Accessed on 08.01.2018

  9. Matassa P (2006) Grow up already! – An OPM3® primer. In: Paper presented at PMI Global Contress 2006 – North America. Project Management Institute, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crawford JK (2007) Project management maturity model. Center for business practices, 2. Aufl. Auerbach, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hauke F, Thomas T (2014) Mittelstand im Wandel – Wie ein Unternehmen seinen digitalen Reifegrad ermitteln kann. BSP Business School, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. BMWi (2018) Checkliste: Kommt Industrie 4.0 für unser Unternehmen in Frage? https://www.existenzgruender.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Checklisten-Uebersichten/Checkliste-Industrie-4-0.html/. Accessed on 08.01.2018

  13. HNU (2018) Analysetool digitaler Reifegrad. http://reifegradanalyse.hs-neu-ulm.de//. Accessed on 08.01.2018

  14. Telekom (2018) Digitalisierungsindex. https://benchmark.digitalisierungsindex.de//. Accessed on 08.01.2018

  15. Boos F, Heitger B (1996) Kunst oder Technik? Der Projektmanager als sozialer Architekt. In: Balck H (Hrsg) Networking und Projektorientierung: Gestaltung des Wandels in Unternehmen und Märkten. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 165–182

    Google Scholar 

  16. Timinger H (2016) Seel C (2016) Ein Ordnungsrahmen für adaptives hybrides Projektmanagement. GPM-Magazin PMaktuell 4:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  17. Timinger H (2017) Modernes Projektmanagement: Mit traditionellem, agilem und hybridem Vorgehen zum Erfolg, 1. Aufl. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frey CB, Osborne M (2013) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/view/1314/. Accessed on 08.01.2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Timinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Timinger, H., Seel, C. (2024). Vision and Maturity Model for Digitized Project Management. In: Barton, T., Müller, C., Seel, C. (eds) Digitalization in companies. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39094-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39094-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39093-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39094-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation