• 261 Accesses

Abstract

Anthropology, with its troubling colonial legacy, has faced the call to be decolonized for a long time. Beyond interrogating the historical, epistemological, and methodological grounds on which anthropology was built, questions still loom on how to practically distance the discipline from its colonial roots. In this chapter, I draw from Judith Schlehe’s insightful work on collaborative methodologies to demonstrate one of the responses to this call for anthropology to practically decolonize. My points of focus are on key features of anthropological theorizing and method: decolonization, positionality, and reflexivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
EUR 29.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 39.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to its colonial legacy, Cameroon is made up of former British and French territories.

  2. 2.

    Bushfaller is the term used to describe transnational migrants in Anglophone Cameroon. To capture this vividly, think of someone going to the bush where there is greener pasture and game and then coming back later with the booty/harvest.

  3. 3.

    Further addressing the topic of attention in this patriarchal setting, it could be emasculating for a black man if a restaurant bill were given directly to a white woman (in some cases, these bills were hesitantly offered to me, albeit with close watch on my tandem partner to see if she would take the bill instead).

References

  • Borneman, J. 1995. American anthropology as foreign policy. American Anthropologist 97 (4): 663–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. 2009. Provincializing Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. 1993. Eurocentrism and modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt lectures). Boundary 2, 20 (3): 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. 2002. World-system and “trans”-modernity. Nepantla: Views from South 3(2): 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. 1991. Anthropology and the development encounter. The making and marketing of development anthropology. American Ethnologist 18(4): 658–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. 1967. Black skin, White masks. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei, B. 2013. Sociality revisited? The use of the internet and mobile phones in urban Cameroon. Bamenda: Langaa RPCIG.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, L. 2018. Stirring up silence. What does decolonising anthropology in Aotearoa New Zealand really mean? Commoning Ethnography 1(1): 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. 2012. Black existence in philosophy of culture. Diogenes 59(3–4): 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. 1988. Apartheid’s anthropologists: The genealogy of Afrikaner anthropology. American Ethnologist 15 (3): 535–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1973. Anthropology and Colonialism. Current Anthropology 14(5): 581–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafeje, A. 1976. The Problem of anthropology in historical perspective. An inquiry into the growth of the social sciences. Canadian Journal of African Studies/Revue Canadienne Des Études Africaines 10(2): 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Torres, N. 2007. On the Coloniality of Being, Cultural Studies 21(2–3): 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548.

  • Mbembe, A. 2001. On the postcolony. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. 2016. Decolonizing the university. New directions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 15(1): 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter. 2009. Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom, theory. Culture& Society 26 (7–8), 159–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mpofu, W., and M. Steyn. 2021. The trouble with the human. In Decolonising the human. Reflections from Africa on difference and oppression, Eds. M. Steyn and W. Mpofu, 1–24. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. 2019. Provisional notes on decolonizing research methodology and undoing its dirty history. Journal of Develo** Societies 35(4): 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngeh, J. 2021. Inclusion and exclusion of postcolonial subjects in knowledge production. Academic experience in Sweden, Cameroon, and Germany. In Global South scholars in the western academy. Harnessing unique experiences, knowledges, and positionality in the Third Space, Eds. S.B. Martin and D. Dandekar, 65–76. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamnjoh, F. 2012. Blinded by sight. Divining the future of anthropology in Africa. Africa Spectrum: 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamnjoh, Francis. 2016. #RhodesMustFall. Nibbling at resilient colonialism in South Africa. Bamenda: Langaa RPCIG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. 1998. Generation X. Anthropology in a media-saturated world. Cultural Anthropology 13(3): 414–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, P. 2008. What has anthropology learned from the anthropology of colonialism? Social Anthropology 16(3): 280–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. 1989. Representing the colonized. Anthropology’s interlocutors. Critical Inquiry 15 (2): 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlehe, J., and S. Hidayah. 2013. Transcultural ethnography in tandems. Collaboration and reciprocity combined and extended. Freiburger Ethnologische Arbeitspapiere 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlehe, Judith. 2008. Introduction. Multidirectional research practice in anthropology. In Towards global education? Indonesian and German academic cultures compared, Eds. J. Schlehe and L.L. Simatupang, 13–22. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies. Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn, M. 2001. Whiteness just isn’t what it used to be. White identity in a changing South Africa. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazanu, P. 2012. Being available and reachable. New media and Cameroonian transnational sociality. African Books Collective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazanu, P. 2015. On the liveness of mobile phone mediation. Youth expectations of remittances and narratives of discontent in the Cameroonian transnational family. Mobile Media and Communication 3(1): 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazanu, P., and B. Frei. 2017. Closeness, distance and disappearances in Cameroonian mediated transnational social ties. Uses of mobile phones and narratives of transformed identities. Journal of African Media Studies 9 (1): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiong’o, wa Ngũgĩ. 1986. Decolonising the mind. The politics of language in African literature. Nairobi: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. 2019. What is anthropology that decolonising scholarship should be mindful of it? Anthropology Southern Africa 42(2): 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. 2018. Decolonising knowledge. Reflections on colonial anthropology and a humanities seminar at the university of the free state. Strategic Review for Southern Africa 40(1): 82–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. 2012. Postcolonial remains. New Literary History 43(1): 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Primus M. Tazanu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tazanu, P. (2023). On Decolonizing Anthropology: Postcolonial Theorizing and Collaborative Methodologies. In: Lücking, M., Meiser, A., Rohrer, I. (eds) In Tandem – Pathways towards a Postcolonial Anthropology | Im Tandem – Wege zu einer postkolonialen Ethnologie . Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38673-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38673-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-38672-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-38673-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation